Cargando…
Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable?
If being open means maximizing the number of people a paper can reach and minimizing the difficulties of re-using the information within it, then the release of all information associated with a paper is critical. For ethical reasons, high standards of reporting are extra critical in regards to anim...
Autores principales: | Eisen, Jonathan A., Ganley, Emma, MacCallum, Catriona J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reporting Animal Studies: Good Science and a Duty of Care
por: MacCallum, Catriona J.
Publicado: (2010) -
When Is Open Access Not Open Access?
por: MacCallum, Catriona J
Publicado: (2007) -
Genomics of Emerging Infectious Disease: A PLoS Collection
por: Eisen, Jonathan A., et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Open Access Increases Citation Rate
por: MacCallum, Catriona J, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Expert Failure: Re-evaluating Research Assessment
por: Eisen, Jonathan A., et al.
Publicado: (2013)