Cargando…

Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance?

Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (C-tDCS) has been reported, across different studies, to facilitate or hinder performance, or simply to have no tangible effect on behavior. This discrepancy is most prominent when C-tDCS is used to alter a cognitive function, questioning the assumpti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nozari, Nazbanou, Woodard, Kristina, Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084338
_version_ 1782298482228330496
author Nozari, Nazbanou
Woodard, Kristina
Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
author_facet Nozari, Nazbanou
Woodard, Kristina
Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
author_sort Nozari, Nazbanou
collection PubMed
description Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (C-tDCS) has been reported, across different studies, to facilitate or hinder performance, or simply to have no tangible effect on behavior. This discrepancy is most prominent when C-tDCS is used to alter a cognitive function, questioning the assumption that cathodal stimulation always compromises performance. In this study, we aimed to study the effect of two variables on performance in a simple cognitive task (letter Flanker), when C-tDCS was applied to the left prefrontal cortex (PFC): (1) the time of testing relative to stimulation (during or after), and (2) the nature of the cognitive activity during stimulation in case of post-tDCS testing. In three experiments, we had participants either perform the Flanker task during C-tDCS (Experiment 1), or after C-tDCS. When the Flanker task was administered after C-tDCS, we varied whether during stimulation subjects were engaged in activities that posed low (Experiment 2) or high (Experiment 3) demands on the PFC. Our findings show that the nature of the task during C-tDCS has a systematic influence on the outcome, while timing per se does not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3883650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38836502014-01-09 Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance? Nozari, Nazbanou Woodard, Kristina Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. PLoS One Research Article Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (C-tDCS) has been reported, across different studies, to facilitate or hinder performance, or simply to have no tangible effect on behavior. This discrepancy is most prominent when C-tDCS is used to alter a cognitive function, questioning the assumption that cathodal stimulation always compromises performance. In this study, we aimed to study the effect of two variables on performance in a simple cognitive task (letter Flanker), when C-tDCS was applied to the left prefrontal cortex (PFC): (1) the time of testing relative to stimulation (during or after), and (2) the nature of the cognitive activity during stimulation in case of post-tDCS testing. In three experiments, we had participants either perform the Flanker task during C-tDCS (Experiment 1), or after C-tDCS. When the Flanker task was administered after C-tDCS, we varied whether during stimulation subjects were engaged in activities that posed low (Experiment 2) or high (Experiment 3) demands on the PFC. Our findings show that the nature of the task during C-tDCS has a systematic influence on the outcome, while timing per se does not. Public Library of Science 2014-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3883650/ /pubmed/24409291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084338 Text en © 2014 Nozari et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nozari, Nazbanou
Woodard, Kristina
Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance?
title Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance?
title_full Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance?
title_fullStr Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance?
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance?
title_short Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance?
title_sort consequences of cathodal stimulation for behavior: when does it help and when does it hurt performance?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084338
work_keys_str_mv AT nozarinazbanou consequencesofcathodalstimulationforbehaviorwhendoesithelpandwhendoesithurtperformance
AT woodardkristina consequencesofcathodalstimulationforbehaviorwhendoesithelpandwhendoesithurtperformance
AT thompsonschillsharonl consequencesofcathodalstimulationforbehaviorwhendoesithelpandwhendoesithurtperformance