Cargando…
Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance?
Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (C-tDCS) has been reported, across different studies, to facilitate or hinder performance, or simply to have no tangible effect on behavior. This discrepancy is most prominent when C-tDCS is used to alter a cognitive function, questioning the assumpti...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084338 |
_version_ | 1782298482228330496 |
---|---|
author | Nozari, Nazbanou Woodard, Kristina Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. |
author_facet | Nozari, Nazbanou Woodard, Kristina Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. |
author_sort | Nozari, Nazbanou |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (C-tDCS) has been reported, across different studies, to facilitate or hinder performance, or simply to have no tangible effect on behavior. This discrepancy is most prominent when C-tDCS is used to alter a cognitive function, questioning the assumption that cathodal stimulation always compromises performance. In this study, we aimed to study the effect of two variables on performance in a simple cognitive task (letter Flanker), when C-tDCS was applied to the left prefrontal cortex (PFC): (1) the time of testing relative to stimulation (during or after), and (2) the nature of the cognitive activity during stimulation in case of post-tDCS testing. In three experiments, we had participants either perform the Flanker task during C-tDCS (Experiment 1), or after C-tDCS. When the Flanker task was administered after C-tDCS, we varied whether during stimulation subjects were engaged in activities that posed low (Experiment 2) or high (Experiment 3) demands on the PFC. Our findings show that the nature of the task during C-tDCS has a systematic influence on the outcome, while timing per se does not. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3883650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38836502014-01-09 Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance? Nozari, Nazbanou Woodard, Kristina Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. PLoS One Research Article Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (C-tDCS) has been reported, across different studies, to facilitate or hinder performance, or simply to have no tangible effect on behavior. This discrepancy is most prominent when C-tDCS is used to alter a cognitive function, questioning the assumption that cathodal stimulation always compromises performance. In this study, we aimed to study the effect of two variables on performance in a simple cognitive task (letter Flanker), when C-tDCS was applied to the left prefrontal cortex (PFC): (1) the time of testing relative to stimulation (during or after), and (2) the nature of the cognitive activity during stimulation in case of post-tDCS testing. In three experiments, we had participants either perform the Flanker task during C-tDCS (Experiment 1), or after C-tDCS. When the Flanker task was administered after C-tDCS, we varied whether during stimulation subjects were engaged in activities that posed low (Experiment 2) or high (Experiment 3) demands on the PFC. Our findings show that the nature of the task during C-tDCS has a systematic influence on the outcome, while timing per se does not. Public Library of Science 2014-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3883650/ /pubmed/24409291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084338 Text en © 2014 Nozari et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nozari, Nazbanou Woodard, Kristina Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance? |
title | Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance? |
title_full | Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance? |
title_fullStr | Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance? |
title_full_unstemmed | Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance? |
title_short | Consequences of Cathodal Stimulation for Behavior: When Does It Help and When Does It Hurt Performance? |
title_sort | consequences of cathodal stimulation for behavior: when does it help and when does it hurt performance? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084338 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nozarinazbanou consequencesofcathodalstimulationforbehaviorwhendoesithelpandwhendoesithurtperformance AT woodardkristina consequencesofcathodalstimulationforbehaviorwhendoesithelpandwhendoesithurtperformance AT thompsonschillsharonl consequencesofcathodalstimulationforbehaviorwhendoesithelpandwhendoesithurtperformance |