Cargando…
Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Computed Tomography in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The More Υou See the More You Know
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is proposed as the preferred imaging modality to investigate patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA). This is mainly based on a higher yield of small acute ischemic lesions; however, direct prospective comparisons are lacking. In this study, we aime...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3884208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24403904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000355024 |
_version_ | 1782298537514500096 |
---|---|
author | Moreau, François Asdaghi, Negar Modi, Jayesh Goyal, Mayank Coutts, Shelagh B. |
author_facet | Moreau, François Asdaghi, Negar Modi, Jayesh Goyal, Mayank Coutts, Shelagh B. |
author_sort | Moreau, François |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is proposed as the preferred imaging modality to investigate patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA). This is mainly based on a higher yield of small acute ischemic lesions; however, direct prospective comparisons are lacking. In this study, we aimed to directly compare the yield of acute ischemic lesions on MRI and computed tomography (CT) in the emergency diagnosis of suspected TIA or minor stroke. METHODS: Consecutive patients aged 18 years or older presenting with minor stroke (NIHSS <4) or high-risk TIA and who were examined by a stroke neurologist within 24 h of symptom onset were prospectively enrolled in the CATCH study. Patients who had undergone both a baseline CT and an MRI within 24 h of symptom onset were included in this substudy. Baseline MRI and CT were interpreted independently to identify an acute ischemic lesion. The rates of acute ischemic lesions on CT and MRI were compared, and the volume of acute ischemic lesions was measured on MRI. In addition, the volume of acute ischemic lesions on MRI was compared between patients who had evidence of acute ischemia on CT and in those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 347 patients were included, 168 with TIAs, 147 with minor strokes and 32 with a final diagnosis of a mimic. Acute ischemic lesions were detected in 39% of TIAs by using MRI versus 8% by using CT (p < 0.0001) and in 86% of minor strokes by using MRI versus 18% by using CT (p < 0.0001). Compared to MRI, CT had a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 98% in identifying an acute ischemic lesion. The infarct volume on diffusion-weighted MRI was larger in cases where the CT also showed an acute ischemic lesion (median 5.07 ml, IQR 10) as compared to lesions seen only on MRI (median 0.68 ml, IQR 1.31, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: MRI is superior to CT in detecting the small ischemic lesions occurring after TIA and minor stroke. Since these lesions are clinically relevant, MRI should be the preferred imaging modality in this setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3884208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38842082014-01-08 Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Computed Tomography in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The More Υou See the More You Know Moreau, François Asdaghi, Negar Modi, Jayesh Goyal, Mayank Coutts, Shelagh B. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra Imaging BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is proposed as the preferred imaging modality to investigate patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA). This is mainly based on a higher yield of small acute ischemic lesions; however, direct prospective comparisons are lacking. In this study, we aimed to directly compare the yield of acute ischemic lesions on MRI and computed tomography (CT) in the emergency diagnosis of suspected TIA or minor stroke. METHODS: Consecutive patients aged 18 years or older presenting with minor stroke (NIHSS <4) or high-risk TIA and who were examined by a stroke neurologist within 24 h of symptom onset were prospectively enrolled in the CATCH study. Patients who had undergone both a baseline CT and an MRI within 24 h of symptom onset were included in this substudy. Baseline MRI and CT were interpreted independently to identify an acute ischemic lesion. The rates of acute ischemic lesions on CT and MRI were compared, and the volume of acute ischemic lesions was measured on MRI. In addition, the volume of acute ischemic lesions on MRI was compared between patients who had evidence of acute ischemia on CT and in those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 347 patients were included, 168 with TIAs, 147 with minor strokes and 32 with a final diagnosis of a mimic. Acute ischemic lesions were detected in 39% of TIAs by using MRI versus 8% by using CT (p < 0.0001) and in 86% of minor strokes by using MRI versus 18% by using CT (p < 0.0001). Compared to MRI, CT had a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 98% in identifying an acute ischemic lesion. The infarct volume on diffusion-weighted MRI was larger in cases where the CT also showed an acute ischemic lesion (median 5.07 ml, IQR 10) as compared to lesions seen only on MRI (median 0.68 ml, IQR 1.31, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: MRI is superior to CT in detecting the small ischemic lesions occurring after TIA and minor stroke. Since these lesions are clinically relevant, MRI should be the preferred imaging modality in this setting. S. Karger AG 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3884208/ /pubmed/24403904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000355024 Text en Copyright © 2013 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Users may download, print and share this work on the Internet for noncommercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited, and a link to the original work on http://www.karger.com and the terms of this license are included in any shared versions. |
spellingShingle | Imaging Moreau, François Asdaghi, Negar Modi, Jayesh Goyal, Mayank Coutts, Shelagh B. Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Computed Tomography in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The More Υou See the More You Know |
title | Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Computed Tomography in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The More Υou See the More You Know |
title_full | Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Computed Tomography in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The More Υou See the More You Know |
title_fullStr | Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Computed Tomography in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The More Υou See the More You Know |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Computed Tomography in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The More Υou See the More You Know |
title_short | Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Computed Tomography in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The More Υou See the More You Know |
title_sort | magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: the more υou see the more you know |
topic | Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3884208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24403904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000355024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moreaufrancois magneticresonanceimagingversuscomputedtomographyintransientischemicattackandminorstrokethemoreyouseethemoreyouknow AT asdaghinegar magneticresonanceimagingversuscomputedtomographyintransientischemicattackandminorstrokethemoreyouseethemoreyouknow AT modijayesh magneticresonanceimagingversuscomputedtomographyintransientischemicattackandminorstrokethemoreyouseethemoreyouknow AT goyalmayank magneticresonanceimagingversuscomputedtomographyintransientischemicattackandminorstrokethemoreyouseethemoreyouknow AT couttsshelaghb magneticresonanceimagingversuscomputedtomographyintransientischemicattackandminorstrokethemoreyouseethemoreyouknow |