Cargando…

Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research

There is no universally accepted definition of what an incidental finding is [Wolf et al., 2008] and broadly speaking this could include variants of known and unknown clinical significance, variants linked to highly penetrant, serious, life-threatening conditions, non-paternity or ancestry data. For...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Middleton, Anna, Parker, Michael, Wright, Caroline F, Bragin, Eugene, Hurles, Matthew E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3884757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23813698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36067
Descripción
Sumario:There is no universally accepted definition of what an incidental finding is [Wolf et al., 2008] and broadly speaking this could include variants of known and unknown clinical significance, variants linked to highly penetrant, serious, life-threatening conditions, non-paternity or ancestry data. For the purposes of our study, we have adopted a pragmatic distinction between ‘pertinent’ and ‘incidental’ findings as set out in this text. Whilst in the US definitions of incidental findings are becoming accepted in practice [Green et al., 2013] it is still not known how and whether these also apply elsewhere around the world.