Cargando…

Quinolone Prophylaxis in Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: An Eight-Year Single Center Experience

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis with pipemidic acid and levofloxacin in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUSP-Bx). From January 2002 to December 2004, patients receiving oral pipemidic acid 500 mg twice daily for three days with or without a preoperative intra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiang, Bing-Juin, Pu, Yeong Shiau, Chung, Shiu-Dong, Liu, Shih-Ping, Yu, Hong-Jeng, Wang, Shuo-Meng, Chang, Hong-Chiang, Chiang, I-Ni, Huang, Chao-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3885187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/452107
_version_ 1782298720596918272
author Chiang, Bing-Juin
Pu, Yeong Shiau
Chung, Shiu-Dong
Liu, Shih-Ping
Yu, Hong-Jeng
Wang, Shuo-Meng
Chang, Hong-Chiang
Chiang, I-Ni
Huang, Chao-Yuan
author_facet Chiang, Bing-Juin
Pu, Yeong Shiau
Chung, Shiu-Dong
Liu, Shih-Ping
Yu, Hong-Jeng
Wang, Shuo-Meng
Chang, Hong-Chiang
Chiang, I-Ni
Huang, Chao-Yuan
author_sort Chiang, Bing-Juin
collection PubMed
description We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis with pipemidic acid and levofloxacin in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUSP-Bx). From January 2002 to December 2004, patients receiving oral pipemidic acid 500 mg twice daily for three days with or without a preoperative intravenous cefazolin 1 gm injection comprised group A. Between January 2005 and December 2009, patients receiving oral levofloxacin 500 mg one hour before biopsy comprised group B. We calculated the annual febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) rates. Patients' characteristics, including age, prophylactic antibiotics, biopsy core numbers, pathologic results, PSA, and the spectrums and susceptibility of pathogens, were also evaluated. A total of 1313 (35.5%) patients belonged to group A, while 2381 (64.5%) patients belonged to group B. Seventy-three patients experienced postoperative infectious complications. There was a significant difference in the fUTI rate between groups A and B (3.7% versus 1.0%, P < 0.001). The yearly fUTI rates varied from 0.6 to 3.9% between 2002 and 2009. Of the 73 patients with fUTI, those receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis were more likely to harbor fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens (P < 0.001). E. coli was the most common pathogen in both groups. Levofloxacin remains effective and appears superior to pipemidic acid based prophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3885187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38851872014-01-21 Quinolone Prophylaxis in Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: An Eight-Year Single Center Experience Chiang, Bing-Juin Pu, Yeong Shiau Chung, Shiu-Dong Liu, Shih-Ping Yu, Hong-Jeng Wang, Shuo-Meng Chang, Hong-Chiang Chiang, I-Ni Huang, Chao-Yuan ScientificWorldJournal Clinical Study We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis with pipemidic acid and levofloxacin in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUSP-Bx). From January 2002 to December 2004, patients receiving oral pipemidic acid 500 mg twice daily for three days with or without a preoperative intravenous cefazolin 1 gm injection comprised group A. Between January 2005 and December 2009, patients receiving oral levofloxacin 500 mg one hour before biopsy comprised group B. We calculated the annual febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) rates. Patients' characteristics, including age, prophylactic antibiotics, biopsy core numbers, pathologic results, PSA, and the spectrums and susceptibility of pathogens, were also evaluated. A total of 1313 (35.5%) patients belonged to group A, while 2381 (64.5%) patients belonged to group B. Seventy-three patients experienced postoperative infectious complications. There was a significant difference in the fUTI rate between groups A and B (3.7% versus 1.0%, P < 0.001). The yearly fUTI rates varied from 0.6 to 3.9% between 2002 and 2009. Of the 73 patients with fUTI, those receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis were more likely to harbor fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens (P < 0.001). E. coli was the most common pathogen in both groups. Levofloxacin remains effective and appears superior to pipemidic acid based prophylaxis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3885187/ /pubmed/24453852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/452107 Text en Copyright © 2013 Bing-Juin Chiang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Chiang, Bing-Juin
Pu, Yeong Shiau
Chung, Shiu-Dong
Liu, Shih-Ping
Yu, Hong-Jeng
Wang, Shuo-Meng
Chang, Hong-Chiang
Chiang, I-Ni
Huang, Chao-Yuan
Quinolone Prophylaxis in Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: An Eight-Year Single Center Experience
title Quinolone Prophylaxis in Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: An Eight-Year Single Center Experience
title_full Quinolone Prophylaxis in Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: An Eight-Year Single Center Experience
title_fullStr Quinolone Prophylaxis in Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: An Eight-Year Single Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Quinolone Prophylaxis in Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: An Eight-Year Single Center Experience
title_short Quinolone Prophylaxis in Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: An Eight-Year Single Center Experience
title_sort quinolone prophylaxis in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: an eight-year single center experience
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3885187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/452107
work_keys_str_mv AT chiangbingjuin quinoloneprophylaxisintransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyaneightyearsinglecenterexperience
AT puyeongshiau quinoloneprophylaxisintransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyaneightyearsinglecenterexperience
AT chungshiudong quinoloneprophylaxisintransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyaneightyearsinglecenterexperience
AT liushihping quinoloneprophylaxisintransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyaneightyearsinglecenterexperience
AT yuhongjeng quinoloneprophylaxisintransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyaneightyearsinglecenterexperience
AT wangshuomeng quinoloneprophylaxisintransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyaneightyearsinglecenterexperience
AT changhongchiang quinoloneprophylaxisintransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyaneightyearsinglecenterexperience
AT chiangini quinoloneprophylaxisintransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyaneightyearsinglecenterexperience
AT huangchaoyuan quinoloneprophylaxisintransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyaneightyearsinglecenterexperience