Cargando…

Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts

The rapid expansion of global urban development is increasing opportunities for wildlife to forage and become dependent on anthropogenic resources. Wildlife using urban areas are often perceived dichotomously as urban or not, with some individuals removed in the belief that dependency on anthropogen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baruch-Mordo, Sharon, Wilson, Kenneth R., Lewis, David L., Broderick, John, Mao, Julie S., Breck, Stewart W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3885671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24416350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085122
_version_ 1782298791922106368
author Baruch-Mordo, Sharon
Wilson, Kenneth R.
Lewis, David L.
Broderick, John
Mao, Julie S.
Breck, Stewart W.
author_facet Baruch-Mordo, Sharon
Wilson, Kenneth R.
Lewis, David L.
Broderick, John
Mao, Julie S.
Breck, Stewart W.
author_sort Baruch-Mordo, Sharon
collection PubMed
description The rapid expansion of global urban development is increasing opportunities for wildlife to forage and become dependent on anthropogenic resources. Wildlife using urban areas are often perceived dichotomously as urban or not, with some individuals removed in the belief that dependency on anthropogenic resources is irreversible and can lead to increased human-wildlife conflict. For American black bears (Ursus americanus), little is known about the degree of bear urbanization and its ecological mechanisms to guide the management of human-bear conflicts. Using 6 years of GPS location and activity data from bears in Aspen, Colorado, USA, we evaluated the degree of bear urbanization and the factors that best explained its variations. We estimated space use, activity patterns, survival, and reproduction and modeled their relationship with ecological covariates related to bear characteristics and natural food availability. Space use and activity patterns were dependent on natural food availability (good or poor food years), where bears used higher human density areas and became more nocturnal in poor food years. Patterns were reversible, i.e., individuals using urban areas in poor food years used wildland areas in subsequent good food years. While reproductive output was similar across years, survival was lower in poor food years when bears used urban areas to a greater extent. Our findings suggest that bear use of urban areas is reversible and fluctuates with the availability of natural food resources, and that removal of urban individuals in times of food failures has the potential to negatively affect bear populations. Given that under current predictions urbanization is expected to increase by 11% across American black bear range, and that natural food failure years are expected to increase in frequency with global climate change, alternative methods of reducing urban human-bear conflict are required if the goal is to prevent urban areas from becoming population sinks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3885671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38856712014-01-10 Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts Baruch-Mordo, Sharon Wilson, Kenneth R. Lewis, David L. Broderick, John Mao, Julie S. Breck, Stewart W. PLoS One Research Article The rapid expansion of global urban development is increasing opportunities for wildlife to forage and become dependent on anthropogenic resources. Wildlife using urban areas are often perceived dichotomously as urban or not, with some individuals removed in the belief that dependency on anthropogenic resources is irreversible and can lead to increased human-wildlife conflict. For American black bears (Ursus americanus), little is known about the degree of bear urbanization and its ecological mechanisms to guide the management of human-bear conflicts. Using 6 years of GPS location and activity data from bears in Aspen, Colorado, USA, we evaluated the degree of bear urbanization and the factors that best explained its variations. We estimated space use, activity patterns, survival, and reproduction and modeled their relationship with ecological covariates related to bear characteristics and natural food availability. Space use and activity patterns were dependent on natural food availability (good or poor food years), where bears used higher human density areas and became more nocturnal in poor food years. Patterns were reversible, i.e., individuals using urban areas in poor food years used wildland areas in subsequent good food years. While reproductive output was similar across years, survival was lower in poor food years when bears used urban areas to a greater extent. Our findings suggest that bear use of urban areas is reversible and fluctuates with the availability of natural food resources, and that removal of urban individuals in times of food failures has the potential to negatively affect bear populations. Given that under current predictions urbanization is expected to increase by 11% across American black bear range, and that natural food failure years are expected to increase in frequency with global climate change, alternative methods of reducing urban human-bear conflict are required if the goal is to prevent urban areas from becoming population sinks. Public Library of Science 2014-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3885671/ /pubmed/24416350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085122 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baruch-Mordo, Sharon
Wilson, Kenneth R.
Lewis, David L.
Broderick, John
Mao, Julie S.
Breck, Stewart W.
Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts
title Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts
title_full Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts
title_fullStr Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts
title_full_unstemmed Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts
title_short Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts
title_sort stochasticity in natural forage production affects use of urban areas by black bears: implications to management of human-bear conflicts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3885671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24416350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085122
work_keys_str_mv AT baruchmordosharon stochasticityinnaturalforageproductionaffectsuseofurbanareasbyblackbearsimplicationstomanagementofhumanbearconflicts
AT wilsonkennethr stochasticityinnaturalforageproductionaffectsuseofurbanareasbyblackbearsimplicationstomanagementofhumanbearconflicts
AT lewisdavidl stochasticityinnaturalforageproductionaffectsuseofurbanareasbyblackbearsimplicationstomanagementofhumanbearconflicts
AT broderickjohn stochasticityinnaturalforageproductionaffectsuseofurbanareasbyblackbearsimplicationstomanagementofhumanbearconflicts
AT maojulies stochasticityinnaturalforageproductionaffectsuseofurbanareasbyblackbearsimplicationstomanagementofhumanbearconflicts
AT breckstewartw stochasticityinnaturalforageproductionaffectsuseofurbanareasbyblackbearsimplicationstomanagementofhumanbearconflicts