Cargando…

Comparison of ChromID Agar and Clostridium difficile Selective Agar for Effective Isolation of C. difficile from Stool Specimens

BACKGROUND: ChromID Clostridium difficile agar (IDCd; bioMérieux SA, France) is a recently developed chromogenic medium for rapid and specific isolation of C. difficile. We compared the performance of IDCd with that of Clostridium difficile Selective Agar (CDSA). METHODS: A total of 530 fresh stool...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Bo-Moon, Lee, Eun Joo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3885767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24422190
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.1.15
_version_ 1782478821217271808
author Shin, Bo-Moon
Lee, Eun Joo
author_facet Shin, Bo-Moon
Lee, Eun Joo
author_sort Shin, Bo-Moon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: ChromID Clostridium difficile agar (IDCd; bioMérieux SA, France) is a recently developed chromogenic medium for rapid and specific isolation of C. difficile. We compared the performance of IDCd with that of Clostridium difficile Selective Agar (CDSA). METHODS: A total of 530 fresh stool specimens were collected from patients with clinical signs compatible with C. difficile infection, and cultures for C. difficile were performed on IDCd and CDSA. C. difficile colonies were identified by spore staining, odor, use of an ANI identification test kit (bioMérieux SA), and multiplex PCR for tcdA, tcdB, and tpi. RESULTS: The concordance rate between IDCd and CDSA was 90.6% (480/530). The positivity rates on IDCd on days 1 and 2 (55.6% and 85.0%, respectively) were significantly higher than those on CDSA (19.4% and 75.6%, respectively) (P<0.001 for day 1 and P=0.02 for day 2), but the detection rates on IDCd and CDSA on day 3 were not different (89.4% vs. 82.8%, P=0.0914). On day 3, the recovery rates for non-C. difficile isolates on IDCd and CDSA were 30.2% (160/530) and 22.1% (117/530), respectively (P=0.0075). Clostridium spp. other than C. difficile were the most prevalent non-C. difficile isolates on both media. CONCLUSIONS: The culture positivity rates on IDCd and CDSA were not different on day 3 but IDCd may allow for rapid and sensitive detection of C. difficile within 2 days of cultivation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3885767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38857672014-01-13 Comparison of ChromID Agar and Clostridium difficile Selective Agar for Effective Isolation of C. difficile from Stool Specimens Shin, Bo-Moon Lee, Eun Joo Ann Lab Med Original Article BACKGROUND: ChromID Clostridium difficile agar (IDCd; bioMérieux SA, France) is a recently developed chromogenic medium for rapid and specific isolation of C. difficile. We compared the performance of IDCd with that of Clostridium difficile Selective Agar (CDSA). METHODS: A total of 530 fresh stool specimens were collected from patients with clinical signs compatible with C. difficile infection, and cultures for C. difficile were performed on IDCd and CDSA. C. difficile colonies were identified by spore staining, odor, use of an ANI identification test kit (bioMérieux SA), and multiplex PCR for tcdA, tcdB, and tpi. RESULTS: The concordance rate between IDCd and CDSA was 90.6% (480/530). The positivity rates on IDCd on days 1 and 2 (55.6% and 85.0%, respectively) were significantly higher than those on CDSA (19.4% and 75.6%, respectively) (P<0.001 for day 1 and P=0.02 for day 2), but the detection rates on IDCd and CDSA on day 3 were not different (89.4% vs. 82.8%, P=0.0914). On day 3, the recovery rates for non-C. difficile isolates on IDCd and CDSA were 30.2% (160/530) and 22.1% (117/530), respectively (P=0.0075). Clostridium spp. other than C. difficile were the most prevalent non-C. difficile isolates on both media. CONCLUSIONS: The culture positivity rates on IDCd and CDSA were not different on day 3 but IDCd may allow for rapid and sensitive detection of C. difficile within 2 days of cultivation. The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2014-01 2013-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3885767/ /pubmed/24422190 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.1.15 Text en © The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shin, Bo-Moon
Lee, Eun Joo
Comparison of ChromID Agar and Clostridium difficile Selective Agar for Effective Isolation of C. difficile from Stool Specimens
title Comparison of ChromID Agar and Clostridium difficile Selective Agar for Effective Isolation of C. difficile from Stool Specimens
title_full Comparison of ChromID Agar and Clostridium difficile Selective Agar for Effective Isolation of C. difficile from Stool Specimens
title_fullStr Comparison of ChromID Agar and Clostridium difficile Selective Agar for Effective Isolation of C. difficile from Stool Specimens
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ChromID Agar and Clostridium difficile Selective Agar for Effective Isolation of C. difficile from Stool Specimens
title_short Comparison of ChromID Agar and Clostridium difficile Selective Agar for Effective Isolation of C. difficile from Stool Specimens
title_sort comparison of chromid agar and clostridium difficile selective agar for effective isolation of c. difficile from stool specimens
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3885767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24422190
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.1.15
work_keys_str_mv AT shinbomoon comparisonofchromidagarandclostridiumdifficileselectiveagarforeffectiveisolationofcdifficilefromstoolspecimens
AT leeeunjoo comparisonofchromidagarandclostridiumdifficileselectiveagarforeffectiveisolationofcdifficilefromstoolspecimens