Cargando…

Systematic analysis of funding awarded for antimicrobial resistance research to institutions in the UK, 1997–2010

OBJECTIVES: To assess the level of research funding awarded to UK institutions specifically for antimicrobial resistance-related research and how closely the topics funded relate to the clinical and public health burden of resistance. METHODS: Databases and web sites were systematically searched for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Head, Michael G., Fitchett, Joseph R., Cooke, Mary K., Wurie, Fatima B., Atun, Rifat, Hayward, Andrew C., Holmes, Alison, Johnson, Alan P., Woodford, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3886928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24038777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt349
_version_ 1782478936753569792
author Head, Michael G.
Fitchett, Joseph R.
Cooke, Mary K.
Wurie, Fatima B.
Atun, Rifat
Hayward, Andrew C.
Holmes, Alison
Johnson, Alan P.
Woodford, Neil
author_facet Head, Michael G.
Fitchett, Joseph R.
Cooke, Mary K.
Wurie, Fatima B.
Atun, Rifat
Hayward, Andrew C.
Holmes, Alison
Johnson, Alan P.
Woodford, Neil
author_sort Head, Michael G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the level of research funding awarded to UK institutions specifically for antimicrobial resistance-related research and how closely the topics funded relate to the clinical and public health burden of resistance. METHODS: Databases and web sites were systematically searched for information on how infectious disease research studies were funded for the period 1997–2010. Studies specifically related to antimicrobial resistance, including bacteriology, virology, mycology and parasitology research, were identified and categorized in terms of funding by pathogen and disease and by a research and development value chain describing the type of science. RESULTS: The overall dataset included 6165 studies receiving a total investment of £2.6 billion, of which £102 million was directed towards antimicrobial resistance research (5.5% of total studies, 3.9% of total spend). Of 337 resistance-related projects, 175 studies focused on bacteriology (40.2% of total resistance-related spending), 42 focused on antiviral resistance (17.2% of funding) and 51 focused on parasitology (27.4% of funding). Mean annual funding ranged from £1.9 million in 1997 to £22.1 million in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the emergence of antimicrobial resistance threatens our future ability to treat many infections, the proportion of the UK infection-research spend targeting this important area is small. There are encouraging signs of increased investment in this area, but it is important that this is sustained and targeted at areas of projected greatest burden. Two areas of particular concern requiring more investment are tuberculosis and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3886928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38869282014-01-10 Systematic analysis of funding awarded for antimicrobial resistance research to institutions in the UK, 1997–2010 Head, Michael G. Fitchett, Joseph R. Cooke, Mary K. Wurie, Fatima B. Atun, Rifat Hayward, Andrew C. Holmes, Alison Johnson, Alan P. Woodford, Neil J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: To assess the level of research funding awarded to UK institutions specifically for antimicrobial resistance-related research and how closely the topics funded relate to the clinical and public health burden of resistance. METHODS: Databases and web sites were systematically searched for information on how infectious disease research studies were funded for the period 1997–2010. Studies specifically related to antimicrobial resistance, including bacteriology, virology, mycology and parasitology research, were identified and categorized in terms of funding by pathogen and disease and by a research and development value chain describing the type of science. RESULTS: The overall dataset included 6165 studies receiving a total investment of £2.6 billion, of which £102 million was directed towards antimicrobial resistance research (5.5% of total studies, 3.9% of total spend). Of 337 resistance-related projects, 175 studies focused on bacteriology (40.2% of total resistance-related spending), 42 focused on antiviral resistance (17.2% of funding) and 51 focused on parasitology (27.4% of funding). Mean annual funding ranged from £1.9 million in 1997 to £22.1 million in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the emergence of antimicrobial resistance threatens our future ability to treat many infections, the proportion of the UK infection-research spend targeting this important area is small. There are encouraging signs of increased investment in this area, but it is important that this is sustained and targeted at areas of projected greatest burden. Two areas of particular concern requiring more investment are tuberculosis and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Oxford University Press 2014-02 2013-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3886928/ /pubmed/24038777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt349 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Head, Michael G.
Fitchett, Joseph R.
Cooke, Mary K.
Wurie, Fatima B.
Atun, Rifat
Hayward, Andrew C.
Holmes, Alison
Johnson, Alan P.
Woodford, Neil
Systematic analysis of funding awarded for antimicrobial resistance research to institutions in the UK, 1997–2010
title Systematic analysis of funding awarded for antimicrobial resistance research to institutions in the UK, 1997–2010
title_full Systematic analysis of funding awarded for antimicrobial resistance research to institutions in the UK, 1997–2010
title_fullStr Systematic analysis of funding awarded for antimicrobial resistance research to institutions in the UK, 1997–2010
title_full_unstemmed Systematic analysis of funding awarded for antimicrobial resistance research to institutions in the UK, 1997–2010
title_short Systematic analysis of funding awarded for antimicrobial resistance research to institutions in the UK, 1997–2010
title_sort systematic analysis of funding awarded for antimicrobial resistance research to institutions in the uk, 1997–2010
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3886928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24038777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt349
work_keys_str_mv AT headmichaelg systematicanalysisoffundingawardedforantimicrobialresistanceresearchtoinstitutionsintheuk19972010
AT fitchettjosephr systematicanalysisoffundingawardedforantimicrobialresistanceresearchtoinstitutionsintheuk19972010
AT cookemaryk systematicanalysisoffundingawardedforantimicrobialresistanceresearchtoinstitutionsintheuk19972010
AT wuriefatimab systematicanalysisoffundingawardedforantimicrobialresistanceresearchtoinstitutionsintheuk19972010
AT atunrifat systematicanalysisoffundingawardedforantimicrobialresistanceresearchtoinstitutionsintheuk19972010
AT haywardandrewc systematicanalysisoffundingawardedforantimicrobialresistanceresearchtoinstitutionsintheuk19972010
AT holmesalison systematicanalysisoffundingawardedforantimicrobialresistanceresearchtoinstitutionsintheuk19972010
AT johnsonalanp systematicanalysisoffundingawardedforantimicrobialresistanceresearchtoinstitutionsintheuk19972010
AT woodfordneil systematicanalysisoffundingawardedforantimicrobialresistanceresearchtoinstitutionsintheuk19972010