Cargando…

Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: A systematic review may evaluate different aspects of a health care intervention. To accommodate the evaluation of various research questions, the inclusion of more than one study design may be necessary. One aim of this study is to find and describe articles on methodological issues con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peinemann, Frank, Tushabe, Doreen Allen, Kleijnen, Jos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24416098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085035
_version_ 1782478975455461376
author Peinemann, Frank
Tushabe, Doreen Allen
Kleijnen, Jos
author_facet Peinemann, Frank
Tushabe, Doreen Allen
Kleijnen, Jos
author_sort Peinemann, Frank
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A systematic review may evaluate different aspects of a health care intervention. To accommodate the evaluation of various research questions, the inclusion of more than one study design may be necessary. One aim of this study is to find and describe articles on methodological issues concerning the incorporation of multiple types of study designs in systematic reviews on health care interventions. Another aim is to evaluate methods studies that have assessed whether reported effects differ by study types. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Methodology Register on 31 March 2012 and identified 42 articles that reported on the integration of single or multiple study designs in systematic reviews. We summarized the contents of the articles qualitatively and assessed theoretical and empirical evidence. We found that many examples of reviews incorporating multiple types of studies exist and that every study design can serve a specific purpose. The clinical questions of a systematic review determine the types of design that are necessary or sufficient to provide the best possible answers. In a second independent search, we identified 49 studies, 31 systematic reviews and 18 trials that compared the effect sizes between randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, which were statistically different in 35%, and not different in 53%. Twelve percent of studies reported both, different and non-different effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Different study designs addressing the same question yielded varying results, with differences in about half of all examples. The risk of presenting uncertain results without knowing for sure the direction and magnitude of the effect holds true for both nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials. The integration of multiple study designs in systematic reviews is required if patients should be informed on the many facets of patient relevant issues of health care interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3887134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38871342014-01-10 Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review Peinemann, Frank Tushabe, Doreen Allen Kleijnen, Jos PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A systematic review may evaluate different aspects of a health care intervention. To accommodate the evaluation of various research questions, the inclusion of more than one study design may be necessary. One aim of this study is to find and describe articles on methodological issues concerning the incorporation of multiple types of study designs in systematic reviews on health care interventions. Another aim is to evaluate methods studies that have assessed whether reported effects differ by study types. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Methodology Register on 31 March 2012 and identified 42 articles that reported on the integration of single or multiple study designs in systematic reviews. We summarized the contents of the articles qualitatively and assessed theoretical and empirical evidence. We found that many examples of reviews incorporating multiple types of studies exist and that every study design can serve a specific purpose. The clinical questions of a systematic review determine the types of design that are necessary or sufficient to provide the best possible answers. In a second independent search, we identified 49 studies, 31 systematic reviews and 18 trials that compared the effect sizes between randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, which were statistically different in 35%, and not different in 53%. Twelve percent of studies reported both, different and non-different effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Different study designs addressing the same question yielded varying results, with differences in about half of all examples. The risk of presenting uncertain results without knowing for sure the direction and magnitude of the effect holds true for both nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials. The integration of multiple study designs in systematic reviews is required if patients should be informed on the many facets of patient relevant issues of health care interventions. Public Library of Science 2013-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3887134/ /pubmed/24416098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085035 Text en © 2013 Peinemann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peinemann, Frank
Tushabe, Doreen Allen
Kleijnen, Jos
Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review
title Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review
title_full Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review
title_short Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review
title_sort using multiple types of studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions – a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24416098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085035
work_keys_str_mv AT peinemannfrank usingmultipletypesofstudiesinsystematicreviewsofhealthcareinterventionsasystematicreview
AT tushabedoreenallen usingmultipletypesofstudiesinsystematicreviewsofhealthcareinterventionsasystematicreview
AT kleijnenjos usingmultipletypesofstudiesinsystematicreviewsofhealthcareinterventionsasystematicreview