Cargando…
Evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment
Benthic macroinvertebrates are sampled in streams and rivers as one of the assessment elements of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s National Rivers and Streams Assessment. In a 2006 report, the recommendation was made that different yet comparable methods be evaluated for different types of s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24081815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3426-6 |
_version_ | 1782478992580804608 |
---|---|
author | Flotemersch, Joseph E. North, Sheila Blocksom, Karen A. |
author_facet | Flotemersch, Joseph E. North, Sheila Blocksom, Karen A. |
author_sort | Flotemersch, Joseph E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Benthic macroinvertebrates are sampled in streams and rivers as one of the assessment elements of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s National Rivers and Streams Assessment. In a 2006 report, the recommendation was made that different yet comparable methods be evaluated for different types of streams (e.g., low gradient vs. high gradient). Consequently, a research element was added to the 2008–2009 National Rivers and Streams Assessment to conduct a side-by-side comparison of the standard macroinvertebrate sampling method with an alternate method specifically designed for low-gradient wadeable streams and rivers that focused more on stream edge habitat. Samples were collected using each method at 525 sites in five of nine aggregate ecoregions located in the conterminous USA. Methods were compared using the benthic macroinvertebrate multimetric index developed for the 2006 Wadeable Streams Assessment. Statistical analysis did not reveal any trends that would suggest the overall assessment of low-gradient streams on a regional or national scale would change if the alternate method was used rather than the standard sampling method, regardless of the gradient cutoff used to define low-gradient streams. Based on these results, the National Rivers and Streams Survey should continue to use the standard field method for sampling all streams. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3887264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38872642014-01-13 Evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment Flotemersch, Joseph E. North, Sheila Blocksom, Karen A. Environ Monit Assess Article Benthic macroinvertebrates are sampled in streams and rivers as one of the assessment elements of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s National Rivers and Streams Assessment. In a 2006 report, the recommendation was made that different yet comparable methods be evaluated for different types of streams (e.g., low gradient vs. high gradient). Consequently, a research element was added to the 2008–2009 National Rivers and Streams Assessment to conduct a side-by-side comparison of the standard macroinvertebrate sampling method with an alternate method specifically designed for low-gradient wadeable streams and rivers that focused more on stream edge habitat. Samples were collected using each method at 525 sites in five of nine aggregate ecoregions located in the conterminous USA. Methods were compared using the benthic macroinvertebrate multimetric index developed for the 2006 Wadeable Streams Assessment. Statistical analysis did not reveal any trends that would suggest the overall assessment of low-gradient streams on a regional or national scale would change if the alternate method was used rather than the standard sampling method, regardless of the gradient cutoff used to define low-gradient streams. Based on these results, the National Rivers and Streams Survey should continue to use the standard field method for sampling all streams. Springer Netherlands 2013-10-01 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3887264/ /pubmed/24081815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3426-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Flotemersch, Joseph E. North, Sheila Blocksom, Karen A. Evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment |
title | Evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment |
title_full | Evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment |
title_short | Evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment |
title_sort | evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the national rivers and streams assessment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24081815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3426-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flotemerschjosephe evaluationofanalternatemethodforsamplingbenthicmacroinvertebratesinlowgradientstreamssampledaspartofthenationalriversandstreamsassessment AT northsheila evaluationofanalternatemethodforsamplingbenthicmacroinvertebratesinlowgradientstreamssampledaspartofthenationalriversandstreamsassessment AT blocksomkarena evaluationofanalternatemethodforsamplingbenthicmacroinvertebratesinlowgradientstreamssampledaspartofthenationalriversandstreamsassessment |