Cargando…

Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma

BACKGROUND: Patients with stage I testicular seminoma are typically diagnosed at a young age and treatment is associated with low relapse and mortality rates. The long-term risks of adjuvant radiotherapy in this patient group are therefore particularly relevant. METHODS: We identified patients and o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horwich, A, Fossa, S D, Huddart, R, Dearnaley, D P, Stenning, S, Aresu, M, Bliss, J M, Hall, E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24263066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.551
_version_ 1782478995859701760
author Horwich, A
Fossa, S D
Huddart, R
Dearnaley, D P
Stenning, S
Aresu, M
Bliss, J M
Hall, E
author_facet Horwich, A
Fossa, S D
Huddart, R
Dearnaley, D P
Stenning, S
Aresu, M
Bliss, J M
Hall, E
author_sort Horwich, A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with stage I testicular seminoma are typically diagnosed at a young age and treatment is associated with low relapse and mortality rates. The long-term risks of adjuvant radiotherapy in this patient group are therefore particularly relevant. METHODS: We identified patients and obtained treatment details from 12 cancer centres (11 United Kingdom, 1 Norway) and ascertained second cancers and mortality through national registries. Data from 2629 seminoma patients treated with radiotherapy between 1960 and 1992 were available, contributing 51 151 person-years of follow-up. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-eight second cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) were identified. The standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47–1.76, P<0.0001). The SIR was 1.53 (95% CI: 1.39–1.68, P<0.0001) when the 32 second testicular cancers were also excluded. This increase was largely due to an excess risk to organs in the radiation field; for pelvic–abdominal sites the SIR was 1.62 (95% CI: 1.43–1.83), with no significant elevated risk of cancers in organs elsewhere. There was no overall increase in mortality with a standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.98–1.14), despite an increase in the cancer-specific mortality (excluding testicular cancer deaths) SMR of 1.46 (95% CI: 1.30–1.65, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of stage I seminoma is excellent and it is important to avoid conferring long-term increased risk of iatrogenic disease such as radiation-associated second cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3887279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38872792015-01-07 Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma Horwich, A Fossa, S D Huddart, R Dearnaley, D P Stenning, S Aresu, M Bliss, J M Hall, E Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Patients with stage I testicular seminoma are typically diagnosed at a young age and treatment is associated with low relapse and mortality rates. The long-term risks of adjuvant radiotherapy in this patient group are therefore particularly relevant. METHODS: We identified patients and obtained treatment details from 12 cancer centres (11 United Kingdom, 1 Norway) and ascertained second cancers and mortality through national registries. Data from 2629 seminoma patients treated with radiotherapy between 1960 and 1992 were available, contributing 51 151 person-years of follow-up. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-eight second cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) were identified. The standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47–1.76, P<0.0001). The SIR was 1.53 (95% CI: 1.39–1.68, P<0.0001) when the 32 second testicular cancers were also excluded. This increase was largely due to an excess risk to organs in the radiation field; for pelvic–abdominal sites the SIR was 1.62 (95% CI: 1.43–1.83), with no significant elevated risk of cancers in organs elsewhere. There was no overall increase in mortality with a standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.98–1.14), despite an increase in the cancer-specific mortality (excluding testicular cancer deaths) SMR of 1.46 (95% CI: 1.30–1.65, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of stage I seminoma is excellent and it is important to avoid conferring long-term increased risk of iatrogenic disease such as radiation-associated second cancers. Nature Publishing Group 2014-01-07 2013-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3887279/ /pubmed/24263066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.551 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Horwich, A
Fossa, S D
Huddart, R
Dearnaley, D P
Stenning, S
Aresu, M
Bliss, J M
Hall, E
Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma
title Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma
title_full Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma
title_fullStr Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma
title_full_unstemmed Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma
title_short Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma
title_sort second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage i seminoma
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24263066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.551
work_keys_str_mv AT horwicha secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma
AT fossasd secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma
AT huddartr secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma
AT dearnaleydp secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma
AT stennings secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma
AT aresum secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma
AT blissjm secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma
AT halle secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma