Cargando…
Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma
BACKGROUND: Patients with stage I testicular seminoma are typically diagnosed at a young age and treatment is associated with low relapse and mortality rates. The long-term risks of adjuvant radiotherapy in this patient group are therefore particularly relevant. METHODS: We identified patients and o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24263066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.551 |
_version_ | 1782478995859701760 |
---|---|
author | Horwich, A Fossa, S D Huddart, R Dearnaley, D P Stenning, S Aresu, M Bliss, J M Hall, E |
author_facet | Horwich, A Fossa, S D Huddart, R Dearnaley, D P Stenning, S Aresu, M Bliss, J M Hall, E |
author_sort | Horwich, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with stage I testicular seminoma are typically diagnosed at a young age and treatment is associated with low relapse and mortality rates. The long-term risks of adjuvant radiotherapy in this patient group are therefore particularly relevant. METHODS: We identified patients and obtained treatment details from 12 cancer centres (11 United Kingdom, 1 Norway) and ascertained second cancers and mortality through national registries. Data from 2629 seminoma patients treated with radiotherapy between 1960 and 1992 were available, contributing 51 151 person-years of follow-up. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-eight second cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) were identified. The standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47–1.76, P<0.0001). The SIR was 1.53 (95% CI: 1.39–1.68, P<0.0001) when the 32 second testicular cancers were also excluded. This increase was largely due to an excess risk to organs in the radiation field; for pelvic–abdominal sites the SIR was 1.62 (95% CI: 1.43–1.83), with no significant elevated risk of cancers in organs elsewhere. There was no overall increase in mortality with a standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.98–1.14), despite an increase in the cancer-specific mortality (excluding testicular cancer deaths) SMR of 1.46 (95% CI: 1.30–1.65, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of stage I seminoma is excellent and it is important to avoid conferring long-term increased risk of iatrogenic disease such as radiation-associated second cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3887279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38872792015-01-07 Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma Horwich, A Fossa, S D Huddart, R Dearnaley, D P Stenning, S Aresu, M Bliss, J M Hall, E Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Patients with stage I testicular seminoma are typically diagnosed at a young age and treatment is associated with low relapse and mortality rates. The long-term risks of adjuvant radiotherapy in this patient group are therefore particularly relevant. METHODS: We identified patients and obtained treatment details from 12 cancer centres (11 United Kingdom, 1 Norway) and ascertained second cancers and mortality through national registries. Data from 2629 seminoma patients treated with radiotherapy between 1960 and 1992 were available, contributing 51 151 person-years of follow-up. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-eight second cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) were identified. The standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47–1.76, P<0.0001). The SIR was 1.53 (95% CI: 1.39–1.68, P<0.0001) when the 32 second testicular cancers were also excluded. This increase was largely due to an excess risk to organs in the radiation field; for pelvic–abdominal sites the SIR was 1.62 (95% CI: 1.43–1.83), with no significant elevated risk of cancers in organs elsewhere. There was no overall increase in mortality with a standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.98–1.14), despite an increase in the cancer-specific mortality (excluding testicular cancer deaths) SMR of 1.46 (95% CI: 1.30–1.65, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of stage I seminoma is excellent and it is important to avoid conferring long-term increased risk of iatrogenic disease such as radiation-associated second cancers. Nature Publishing Group 2014-01-07 2013-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3887279/ /pubmed/24263066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.551 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Horwich, A Fossa, S D Huddart, R Dearnaley, D P Stenning, S Aresu, M Bliss, J M Hall, E Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma |
title | Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma |
title_full | Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma |
title_fullStr | Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma |
title_short | Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma |
title_sort | second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage i seminoma |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24263066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horwicha secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma AT fossasd secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma AT huddartr secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma AT dearnaleydp secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma AT stennings secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma AT aresum secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma AT blissjm secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma AT halle secondcancerriskandmortalityinmentreatedwithradiotherapyforstageiseminoma |