Cargando…

A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956–1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data

BACKGROUND: A 15-country study of nuclear workers reported significantly increased radiation-related risks of all cancers excluding leukaemia, with Canadian data a major factor behind the pooled results. We analysed mortality (1956–1994) in the updated Canadian cohort and provided revised risk estim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zablotska, L B, Lane, R S D, Thompson, P A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24231946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.592
_version_ 1782478996090388480
author Zablotska, L B
Lane, R S D
Thompson, P A
author_facet Zablotska, L B
Lane, R S D
Thompson, P A
author_sort Zablotska, L B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A 15-country study of nuclear workers reported significantly increased radiation-related risks of all cancers excluding leukaemia, with Canadian data a major factor behind the pooled results. We analysed mortality (1956–1994) in the updated Canadian cohort and provided revised risk estimates. METHODS: Employment records were searched to verify and revise exposure data and to restore missing socioeconomic status. Excess relative risks per sievert (ERR/Sv) of recorded radiation dose and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: A significant heterogeneity of the dose–response for solid cancer was identified (P=0.02), with 3088 early (1956–1964) Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) workers having a significant increase (ERR/Sv=7.87, 95% CI: 1.88, 19.5), and no evidence of radiation risk for 42 228 workers employed by three nuclear power plant companies and post-1964 AECL (ERR/Sv=−1.20, 95% CI: <−1.47, 2.39). Radiation risks of leukaemia were negative in early AECL workers and non-significantly increased in other workers. In analyses with separate terms for tritium and gamma doses, there was no evidence of increased risk from tritium exposure. All workers had mortality lower than the general population. CONCLUSION: Significantly increased risks for early AECL workers are most likely due to incomplete transfer of AECL dose records to the National Dose Registry. Analyses of the remainder of the Canadian nuclear workers (93.2%) provided no evidence of increased risk, but the risk estimate was compatible with estimates that form the basis of radiation protection standards. Study findings suggest that the revised Canadian cohort, with the exclusion of early AECL workers, would likely have an important effect on the 15-country pooled risk estimate of radiation-related risks of all cancer excluding leukaemia by substantially reducing the size of the point estimate and its significance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3887280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38872802014-01-10 A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956–1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data Zablotska, L B Lane, R S D Thompson, P A Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: A 15-country study of nuclear workers reported significantly increased radiation-related risks of all cancers excluding leukaemia, with Canadian data a major factor behind the pooled results. We analysed mortality (1956–1994) in the updated Canadian cohort and provided revised risk estimates. METHODS: Employment records were searched to verify and revise exposure data and to restore missing socioeconomic status. Excess relative risks per sievert (ERR/Sv) of recorded radiation dose and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: A significant heterogeneity of the dose–response for solid cancer was identified (P=0.02), with 3088 early (1956–1964) Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) workers having a significant increase (ERR/Sv=7.87, 95% CI: 1.88, 19.5), and no evidence of radiation risk for 42 228 workers employed by three nuclear power plant companies and post-1964 AECL (ERR/Sv=−1.20, 95% CI: <−1.47, 2.39). Radiation risks of leukaemia were negative in early AECL workers and non-significantly increased in other workers. In analyses with separate terms for tritium and gamma doses, there was no evidence of increased risk from tritium exposure. All workers had mortality lower than the general population. CONCLUSION: Significantly increased risks for early AECL workers are most likely due to incomplete transfer of AECL dose records to the National Dose Registry. Analyses of the remainder of the Canadian nuclear workers (93.2%) provided no evidence of increased risk, but the risk estimate was compatible with estimates that form the basis of radiation protection standards. Study findings suggest that the revised Canadian cohort, with the exclusion of early AECL workers, would likely have an important effect on the 15-country pooled risk estimate of radiation-related risks of all cancer excluding leukaemia by substantially reducing the size of the point estimate and its significance. Nature Publishing Group 2014-01-07 2013-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3887280/ /pubmed/24231946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.592 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Zablotska, L B
Lane, R S D
Thompson, P A
A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956–1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data
title A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956–1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data
title_full A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956–1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data
title_fullStr A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956–1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data
title_full_unstemmed A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956–1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data
title_short A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956–1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data
title_sort reanalysis of cancer mortality in canadian nuclear workers (1956–1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24231946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.592
work_keys_str_mv AT zablotskalb areanalysisofcancermortalityincanadiannuclearworkers19561994basedonrevisedexposureandcohortdata
AT lanersd areanalysisofcancermortalityincanadiannuclearworkers19561994basedonrevisedexposureandcohortdata
AT thompsonpa areanalysisofcancermortalityincanadiannuclearworkers19561994basedonrevisedexposureandcohortdata
AT zablotskalb reanalysisofcancermortalityincanadiannuclearworkers19561994basedonrevisedexposureandcohortdata
AT lanersd reanalysisofcancermortalityincanadiannuclearworkers19561994basedonrevisedexposureandcohortdata
AT thompsonpa reanalysisofcancermortalityincanadiannuclearworkers19561994basedonrevisedexposureandcohortdata