Cargando…
Ovarian Stem Cells—the Pros and Cons
The potential for postnatal de novo oogenesis in mammals and in humans has become very controversial in the fields of reproductive science and biology. Historically, it has been thought that females of most mammalian species lose the ability to produce oocytes at birth. A contemporary understanding...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Libertas Academica
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453518 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMRH.S11086 |
_version_ | 1782299034033061888 |
---|---|
author | Evron, Ayelet Blumenfeld, Zeev |
author_facet | Evron, Ayelet Blumenfeld, Zeev |
author_sort | Evron, Ayelet |
collection | PubMed |
description | The potential for postnatal de novo oogenesis in mammals and in humans has become very controversial in the fields of reproductive science and biology. Historically, it has been thought that females of most mammalian species lose the ability to produce oocytes at birth. A contemporary understanding of stem cell biology together with novel experimental methods has challenged the model of a prenatal fixed ovarian primordial follicle pool that declines with age. Researchers have suggested replenishment of post-natal oocytes by germ-line stem cells (GSCs). According to this theory, GSCs produce oocytes and primordial follicles throughout the lifetime of the adult female. This review describes recent approaches supporting the revolutionary idea of de novo oogenesis in mammals and humans of reproductive-age and provides counter arguments from opponents of this novel and innovative concept. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3888079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Libertas Academica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38880792014-01-22 Ovarian Stem Cells—the Pros and Cons Evron, Ayelet Blumenfeld, Zeev Clin Med Insights Reprod Health Perspective The potential for postnatal de novo oogenesis in mammals and in humans has become very controversial in the fields of reproductive science and biology. Historically, it has been thought that females of most mammalian species lose the ability to produce oocytes at birth. A contemporary understanding of stem cell biology together with novel experimental methods has challenged the model of a prenatal fixed ovarian primordial follicle pool that declines with age. Researchers have suggested replenishment of post-natal oocytes by germ-line stem cells (GSCs). According to this theory, GSCs produce oocytes and primordial follicles throughout the lifetime of the adult female. This review describes recent approaches supporting the revolutionary idea of de novo oogenesis in mammals and humans of reproductive-age and provides counter arguments from opponents of this novel and innovative concept. Libertas Academica 2013-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3888079/ /pubmed/24453518 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMRH.S11086 Text en © 2013 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Evron, Ayelet Blumenfeld, Zeev Ovarian Stem Cells—the Pros and Cons |
title | Ovarian Stem Cells—the Pros and Cons |
title_full | Ovarian Stem Cells—the Pros and Cons |
title_fullStr | Ovarian Stem Cells—the Pros and Cons |
title_full_unstemmed | Ovarian Stem Cells—the Pros and Cons |
title_short | Ovarian Stem Cells—the Pros and Cons |
title_sort | ovarian stem cells—the pros and cons |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453518 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMRH.S11086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evronayelet ovarianstemcellstheprosandcons AT blumenfeldzeev ovarianstemcellstheprosandcons |