Cargando…
A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument
Clinical practice CPGs (CPGs) have been developed to summarize evidence related to the management of osteoarthritis (OA). CPGs facilitate uptake of evidence-based knowledge by consumers, health professionals, health administrators and policy makers. The objectives of the present review were: 1) to a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24427268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082986 |
_version_ | 1782299046805766144 |
---|---|
author | Brosseau, Lucie Rahman, Prinon Toupin-April, Karine Poitras, Stéphane King, Judy De Angelis, Gino Loew, Laurianne Casimiro, Lynn Paterson, Gail McEwan, Jessica |
author_facet | Brosseau, Lucie Rahman, Prinon Toupin-April, Karine Poitras, Stéphane King, Judy De Angelis, Gino Loew, Laurianne Casimiro, Lynn Paterson, Gail McEwan, Jessica |
author_sort | Brosseau, Lucie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical practice CPGs (CPGs) have been developed to summarize evidence related to the management of osteoarthritis (OA). CPGs facilitate uptake of evidence-based knowledge by consumers, health professionals, health administrators and policy makers. The objectives of the present review were: 1) to assess the quality of the CPGs on non-pharmacological management of OA; using a standardized and validated instrument - the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool - by three pairs of trained appraisers; and 2) to summarize the recommendations based on only high-quality existing CPGs. Scientific literature databases from 2001 to 2013 were systematically searched for the state of evidence, with 17 CPGs for OA being identified. Most CPGs effectively addressed only a minority of AGREE II domains. Scope and purpose was effectively addressed in 10 CPGs on the management of OA, stakeholder involvement in 12 CPGs, rigour of development in 10 CPGs, clarity/presentation in 17 CPGs, editorial independence in 2 CPGs, and applicability in none of the OA CPGs. The overall quality of the included CPGs, according to the 7-point AGREE II scoring system, is 4.8±0.41 for OA. Therapeutic exercises, patient education, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, acupuncture, orthoses and insoles, heat and cryotherapy, patellar tapping, and weight control are commonly recommended for the non-pharmacological management of OA by the high-quality CPGs. The general clinical management recommendations tended to be similar among high-quality CPGs, although interventions addressed varied. Non-pharmacological management interventions were superficially addressed in more than half of the selected CPGs. For CPGs to be standardized uniform creators should use the AGREE II criteria when developing CPGs. Innovative and effective methods of CPG implementation to users are needed to ultimately enhance the quality of life of arthritic individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3888378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38883782014-01-14 A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument Brosseau, Lucie Rahman, Prinon Toupin-April, Karine Poitras, Stéphane King, Judy De Angelis, Gino Loew, Laurianne Casimiro, Lynn Paterson, Gail McEwan, Jessica PLoS One Research Article Clinical practice CPGs (CPGs) have been developed to summarize evidence related to the management of osteoarthritis (OA). CPGs facilitate uptake of evidence-based knowledge by consumers, health professionals, health administrators and policy makers. The objectives of the present review were: 1) to assess the quality of the CPGs on non-pharmacological management of OA; using a standardized and validated instrument - the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool - by three pairs of trained appraisers; and 2) to summarize the recommendations based on only high-quality existing CPGs. Scientific literature databases from 2001 to 2013 were systematically searched for the state of evidence, with 17 CPGs for OA being identified. Most CPGs effectively addressed only a minority of AGREE II domains. Scope and purpose was effectively addressed in 10 CPGs on the management of OA, stakeholder involvement in 12 CPGs, rigour of development in 10 CPGs, clarity/presentation in 17 CPGs, editorial independence in 2 CPGs, and applicability in none of the OA CPGs. The overall quality of the included CPGs, according to the 7-point AGREE II scoring system, is 4.8±0.41 for OA. Therapeutic exercises, patient education, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, acupuncture, orthoses and insoles, heat and cryotherapy, patellar tapping, and weight control are commonly recommended for the non-pharmacological management of OA by the high-quality CPGs. The general clinical management recommendations tended to be similar among high-quality CPGs, although interventions addressed varied. Non-pharmacological management interventions were superficially addressed in more than half of the selected CPGs. For CPGs to be standardized uniform creators should use the AGREE II criteria when developing CPGs. Innovative and effective methods of CPG implementation to users are needed to ultimately enhance the quality of life of arthritic individuals. Public Library of Science 2014-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3888378/ /pubmed/24427268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082986 Text en © 2014 Brosseau et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brosseau, Lucie Rahman, Prinon Toupin-April, Karine Poitras, Stéphane King, Judy De Angelis, Gino Loew, Laurianne Casimiro, Lynn Paterson, Gail McEwan, Jessica A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument |
title | A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument |
title_full | A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument |
title_short | A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument |
title_sort | systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation ii instrument |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24427268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082986 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brosseaulucie asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT rahmanprinon asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT toupinaprilkarine asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT poitrasstephane asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT kingjudy asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT deangelisgino asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT loewlaurianne asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT casimirolynn asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT patersongail asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT mcewanjessica asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT brosseaulucie systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT rahmanprinon systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT toupinaprilkarine systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT poitrasstephane systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT kingjudy systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT deangelisgino systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT loewlaurianne systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT casimirolynn systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT patersongail systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT mcewanjessica systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument |