Cargando…
Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Colorectal Cancers Differ from Classical Adenocarcinomas in Tumor Biology and Prognosis
OBJECTIVES: To define the prognostic value of different histological subtypes of colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND: Most colorectal cancers are classical adenocarcinomas (AC). Less frequent subtypes include mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC) and signet-ring cell carcinomas (SC). In contrast to established p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23989057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a69f7e |
_version_ | 1782299066047135744 |
---|---|
author | Nitsche, Ulrich Zimmermann, Anina Späth, Christoph Müller, Tara Maak, Matthias Schuster, Tibor Slotta-Huspenina, Julia Käser, Samuel A. Michalski, Christoph W. Janssen, Klaus-Peter Friess, Helmut Rosenberg, Robert Bader, Franz G. |
author_facet | Nitsche, Ulrich Zimmermann, Anina Späth, Christoph Müller, Tara Maak, Matthias Schuster, Tibor Slotta-Huspenina, Julia Käser, Samuel A. Michalski, Christoph W. Janssen, Klaus-Peter Friess, Helmut Rosenberg, Robert Bader, Franz G. |
author_sort | Nitsche, Ulrich |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To define the prognostic value of different histological subtypes of colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND: Most colorectal cancers are classical adenocarcinomas (AC). Less frequent subtypes include mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC) and signet-ring cell carcinomas (SC). In contrast to established prognostic factors such as TNM and grading, the histological subtype has no therapeutical consequences so far, although it may reflect different biological behavior. METHODS: Between 1982 and 2012, a total of 3479 consecutive patients underwent surgery for primary colorectal cancer (AC, MAC, or SC). Clinical, histopathological, and survival data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of all 3479 patients, histological subtype was AC in 3074 cases (88%), MAC in 375 cases (11%), and SC in 30 cases (0.9%). MAC (51%, P < 0.001) and SC (50%, P = 0.029) occurred more frequently in right-sided tumors than AC (28%). Compared with AC, tumor stages and histological grading were higher in MAC and SC (P < 0.001 for each). Rates of angioinvasion were lower in MAC than in AC (5% vs 9%, P = 0.011). Rates of lymphatic invasion were higher in SC than in AC (67% vs 25%, P < 0.001). Five-year cause-specific survival was 67 ± 1% for AC, 61 ± 3% for MAC, and 21 ± 8% for SC (P < 0.001 for difference between the groups). In multivariable analysis, survival did not differ significantly between AC and MAC after correction for tumor stage. However, SC remained an independent prognostic factor associated with worse survival (hazard ratio = 2.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.6–3.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MAC and SC are histological subtypes of colorectal cancer with different characteristics than classical AC. Both are diagnosed in more advanced tumor stages, but the dismal prognosis of SC seems to be caused by its intrinsic tumor biology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3888475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38884752014-01-13 Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Colorectal Cancers Differ from Classical Adenocarcinomas in Tumor Biology and Prognosis Nitsche, Ulrich Zimmermann, Anina Späth, Christoph Müller, Tara Maak, Matthias Schuster, Tibor Slotta-Huspenina, Julia Käser, Samuel A. Michalski, Christoph W. Janssen, Klaus-Peter Friess, Helmut Rosenberg, Robert Bader, Franz G. Ann Surg Original Articles From the ESA Proceedings OBJECTIVES: To define the prognostic value of different histological subtypes of colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND: Most colorectal cancers are classical adenocarcinomas (AC). Less frequent subtypes include mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC) and signet-ring cell carcinomas (SC). In contrast to established prognostic factors such as TNM and grading, the histological subtype has no therapeutical consequences so far, although it may reflect different biological behavior. METHODS: Between 1982 and 2012, a total of 3479 consecutive patients underwent surgery for primary colorectal cancer (AC, MAC, or SC). Clinical, histopathological, and survival data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of all 3479 patients, histological subtype was AC in 3074 cases (88%), MAC in 375 cases (11%), and SC in 30 cases (0.9%). MAC (51%, P < 0.001) and SC (50%, P = 0.029) occurred more frequently in right-sided tumors than AC (28%). Compared with AC, tumor stages and histological grading were higher in MAC and SC (P < 0.001 for each). Rates of angioinvasion were lower in MAC than in AC (5% vs 9%, P = 0.011). Rates of lymphatic invasion were higher in SC than in AC (67% vs 25%, P < 0.001). Five-year cause-specific survival was 67 ± 1% for AC, 61 ± 3% for MAC, and 21 ± 8% for SC (P < 0.001 for difference between the groups). In multivariable analysis, survival did not differ significantly between AC and MAC after correction for tumor stage. However, SC remained an independent prognostic factor associated with worse survival (hazard ratio = 2.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.6–3.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MAC and SC are histological subtypes of colorectal cancer with different characteristics than classical AC. Both are diagnosed in more advanced tumor stages, but the dismal prognosis of SC seems to be caused by its intrinsic tumor biology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2013-11 2013-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3888475/ /pubmed/23989057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a69f7e Text en © 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles From the ESA Proceedings Nitsche, Ulrich Zimmermann, Anina Späth, Christoph Müller, Tara Maak, Matthias Schuster, Tibor Slotta-Huspenina, Julia Käser, Samuel A. Michalski, Christoph W. Janssen, Klaus-Peter Friess, Helmut Rosenberg, Robert Bader, Franz G. Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Colorectal Cancers Differ from Classical Adenocarcinomas in Tumor Biology and Prognosis |
title | Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Colorectal Cancers Differ from Classical Adenocarcinomas in Tumor Biology and Prognosis |
title_full | Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Colorectal Cancers Differ from Classical Adenocarcinomas in Tumor Biology and Prognosis |
title_fullStr | Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Colorectal Cancers Differ from Classical Adenocarcinomas in Tumor Biology and Prognosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Colorectal Cancers Differ from Classical Adenocarcinomas in Tumor Biology and Prognosis |
title_short | Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Colorectal Cancers Differ from Classical Adenocarcinomas in Tumor Biology and Prognosis |
title_sort | mucinous and signet-ring cell colorectal cancers differ from classical adenocarcinomas in tumor biology and prognosis |
topic | Original Articles From the ESA Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23989057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a69f7e |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nitscheulrich mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT zimmermannanina mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT spathchristoph mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT mullertara mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT maakmatthias mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT schustertibor mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT slottahuspeninajulia mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT kasersamuela mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT michalskichristophw mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT janssenklauspeter mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT friesshelmut mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT rosenbergrobert mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis AT baderfranzg mucinousandsignetringcellcolorectalcancersdifferfromclassicaladenocarcinomasintumorbiologyandprognosis |