Cargando…
A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study)
OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) formulations of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). METHODS: Patients (n=1262) were randomly assigned to re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23904473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203523 |
_version_ | 1782299084050137088 |
---|---|
author | Burmester, Gerd R Rubbert-Roth, Andrea Cantagrel, Alain Hall, Stephen Leszczynski, Piotr Feldman, Daniel Rangaraj, Madura J Roane, Georgia Ludivico, Charles Lu, Peng Rowell, Lucy Bao, Min Mysler, Eduardo F |
author_facet | Burmester, Gerd R Rubbert-Roth, Andrea Cantagrel, Alain Hall, Stephen Leszczynski, Piotr Feldman, Daniel Rangaraj, Madura J Roane, Georgia Ludivico, Charles Lu, Peng Rowell, Lucy Bao, Min Mysler, Eduardo F |
author_sort | Burmester, Gerd R |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) formulations of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). METHODS: Patients (n=1262) were randomly assigned to receive tocilizumab-SC 162 mg weekly+placebo-IV every 4 weeks or tocilizumab-IV 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks+placebo-SC weekly in combination with traditional DMARD. The primary outcome was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of tocilizumab-SC to tocilizumab-IV with regard to the proportion of patients in each group achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 24 using a 12% non-inferiority margin (NIM). Secondary outcomes were disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28), ACR responses, health assessment questionnaire scores and safety assessments. RESULTS: At week 24, 69.4% (95% CI 65.5 to 73.2) of tocilizumab-SC-treated patients versus 73.4% (95% CI 69.6 to 77.1) of tocilizumab-IV-treated patients achieved an ACR20 response (weighted difference between groups −4.0%, 95% CI −9.2 to 1.2); the 12% NIM was met. ACR50/70 responses, DAS28 and physical function improvements were comparable between the tocilizumab-SC and tocilizumab-IV groups. The safety profiles of tocilizumab-SC and tocilizumab-IV were similar, and the most common adverse event was infection. Injection-site reactions (ISR) occurred more frequently in the tocilizumab-SC group than in the tocilizumab-IV (placebo-SC) group. No anaphylaxis was reported over the 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab-SC 162 mg weekly demonstrated comparable efficacy to tocilizumab-IV 8 mg/kg. The safety profile of tocilizumab-SC is consistent with the known and well-established safety profile of tocilizumab-IV, with the exception of a higher incidence of ISR, which were more common with tocilizumab-SC administration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3888614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38886142014-01-14 A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study) Burmester, Gerd R Rubbert-Roth, Andrea Cantagrel, Alain Hall, Stephen Leszczynski, Piotr Feldman, Daniel Rangaraj, Madura J Roane, Georgia Ludivico, Charles Lu, Peng Rowell, Lucy Bao, Min Mysler, Eduardo F Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) formulations of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). METHODS: Patients (n=1262) were randomly assigned to receive tocilizumab-SC 162 mg weekly+placebo-IV every 4 weeks or tocilizumab-IV 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks+placebo-SC weekly in combination with traditional DMARD. The primary outcome was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of tocilizumab-SC to tocilizumab-IV with regard to the proportion of patients in each group achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 24 using a 12% non-inferiority margin (NIM). Secondary outcomes were disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28), ACR responses, health assessment questionnaire scores and safety assessments. RESULTS: At week 24, 69.4% (95% CI 65.5 to 73.2) of tocilizumab-SC-treated patients versus 73.4% (95% CI 69.6 to 77.1) of tocilizumab-IV-treated patients achieved an ACR20 response (weighted difference between groups −4.0%, 95% CI −9.2 to 1.2); the 12% NIM was met. ACR50/70 responses, DAS28 and physical function improvements were comparable between the tocilizumab-SC and tocilizumab-IV groups. The safety profiles of tocilizumab-SC and tocilizumab-IV were similar, and the most common adverse event was infection. Injection-site reactions (ISR) occurred more frequently in the tocilizumab-SC group than in the tocilizumab-IV (placebo-SC) group. No anaphylaxis was reported over the 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab-SC 162 mg weekly demonstrated comparable efficacy to tocilizumab-IV 8 mg/kg. The safety profile of tocilizumab-SC is consistent with the known and well-established safety profile of tocilizumab-IV, with the exception of a higher incidence of ISR, which were more common with tocilizumab-SC administration. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-01 2013-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3888614/ /pubmed/23904473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203523 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical and Epidemiological Research Burmester, Gerd R Rubbert-Roth, Andrea Cantagrel, Alain Hall, Stephen Leszczynski, Piotr Feldman, Daniel Rangaraj, Madura J Roane, Georgia Ludivico, Charles Lu, Peng Rowell, Lucy Bao, Min Mysler, Eduardo F A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study) |
title | A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study) |
title_full | A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study) |
title_fullStr | A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study) |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study) |
title_short | A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study) |
title_sort | randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (summacta study) |
topic | Clinical and Epidemiological Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23904473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burmestergerdr arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT rubbertrothandrea arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT cantagrelalain arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT hallstephen arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT leszczynskipiotr arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT feldmandaniel arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT rangarajmaduraj arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT roanegeorgia arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT ludivicocharles arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT lupeng arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT rowelllucy arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT baomin arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT myslereduardof arandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT burmestergerdr randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT rubbertrothandrea randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT cantagrelalain randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT hallstephen randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT leszczynskipiotr randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT feldmandaniel randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT rangarajmaduraj randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT roanegeorgia randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT ludivicocharles randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT lupeng randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT rowelllucy randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT baomin randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy AT myslereduardof randomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupstudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabversusintravenoustocilizumabincombinationwithtraditionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritissummactastudy |