Cargando…
Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis
Background and Objectives. A key factor for the long-term function of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. The effect of adding a stiffener to the tissue side of the Hader bar helps to reduce the transmission of the stresses to the alveolar bone....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/369147 |
_version_ | 1782299097011585024 |
---|---|
author | Satheesh Kumar, Preeti Satheesh, Kumar K. S. John, Jins Patil, Geetha Patel, Ruchi |
author_facet | Satheesh Kumar, Preeti Satheesh, Kumar K. S. John, Jins Patil, Geetha Patel, Ruchi |
author_sort | Satheesh Kumar, Preeti |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives. A key factor for the long-term function of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. The effect of adding a stiffener to the tissue side of the Hader bar helps to reduce the transmission of the stresses to the alveolar bone. But the ideal thickness of the stiffener to be attached to the bar is a subject of much debate. This study aims to analyze the force transfer and stress distribution of an implant-supported overdenture with a Hader bar attachment. The stiffener of the bar attachments was varied and the stress distribution to the bone around the implant was studied. Methods. A CT scan of edentulous mandible was used and three models with 1, 2, and 3 mm thick stiffeners were created and subjected to loads of emulating the masticatory forces. These different models were analyzed by the Finite Element Software (Ansys, Version 8.0) using von Mises stress analysis. Results. The results showed that the maximum stress concentration was seen in the neck of the implant for models A and B. In model C the maximum stress concentration was in the bar attachment making it the model with the best stress distribution, as far as implant failures are concerned. Conclusion. The implant with Hader bar attachment with a 3 mm stiffener is the best in terms of stress distribution, where the stress is concentrated at the bar and stiffener regions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3888690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38886902014-01-23 Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis Satheesh Kumar, Preeti Satheesh, Kumar K. S. John, Jins Patil, Geetha Patel, Ruchi ISRN Dent Research Article Background and Objectives. A key factor for the long-term function of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. The effect of adding a stiffener to the tissue side of the Hader bar helps to reduce the transmission of the stresses to the alveolar bone. But the ideal thickness of the stiffener to be attached to the bar is a subject of much debate. This study aims to analyze the force transfer and stress distribution of an implant-supported overdenture with a Hader bar attachment. The stiffener of the bar attachments was varied and the stress distribution to the bone around the implant was studied. Methods. A CT scan of edentulous mandible was used and three models with 1, 2, and 3 mm thick stiffeners were created and subjected to loads of emulating the masticatory forces. These different models were analyzed by the Finite Element Software (Ansys, Version 8.0) using von Mises stress analysis. Results. The results showed that the maximum stress concentration was seen in the neck of the implant for models A and B. In model C the maximum stress concentration was in the bar attachment making it the model with the best stress distribution, as far as implant failures are concerned. Conclusion. The implant with Hader bar attachment with a 3 mm stiffener is the best in terms of stress distribution, where the stress is concentrated at the bar and stiffener regions. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3888690/ /pubmed/24459589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/369147 Text en Copyright © 2013 Preeti Satheesh Kumar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Satheesh Kumar, Preeti Satheesh, Kumar K. S. John, Jins Patil, Geetha Patel, Ruchi Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis |
title | Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis |
title_full | Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis |
title_fullStr | Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis |
title_short | Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis |
title_sort | force transfer and stress distribution in an implant-supported overdenture retained with a hader bar attachment: a finite element analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/369147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT satheeshkumarpreeti forcetransferandstressdistributioninanimplantsupportedoverdentureretainedwithahaderbarattachmentafiniteelementanalysis AT satheeshkumarks forcetransferandstressdistributioninanimplantsupportedoverdentureretainedwithahaderbarattachmentafiniteelementanalysis AT johnjins forcetransferandstressdistributioninanimplantsupportedoverdentureretainedwithahaderbarattachmentafiniteelementanalysis AT patilgeetha forcetransferandstressdistributioninanimplantsupportedoverdentureretainedwithahaderbarattachmentafiniteelementanalysis AT patelruchi forcetransferandstressdistributioninanimplantsupportedoverdentureretainedwithahaderbarattachmentafiniteelementanalysis |