Cargando…

Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis

Background and Objectives. A key factor for the long-term function of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. The effect of adding a stiffener to the tissue side of the Hader bar helps to reduce the transmission of the stresses to the alveolar bone....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satheesh Kumar, Preeti, Satheesh, Kumar K. S., John, Jins, Patil, Geetha, Patel, Ruchi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/369147
_version_ 1782299097011585024
author Satheesh Kumar, Preeti
Satheesh, Kumar K. S.
John, Jins
Patil, Geetha
Patel, Ruchi
author_facet Satheesh Kumar, Preeti
Satheesh, Kumar K. S.
John, Jins
Patil, Geetha
Patel, Ruchi
author_sort Satheesh Kumar, Preeti
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives. A key factor for the long-term function of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. The effect of adding a stiffener to the tissue side of the Hader bar helps to reduce the transmission of the stresses to the alveolar bone. But the ideal thickness of the stiffener to be attached to the bar is a subject of much debate. This study aims to analyze the force transfer and stress distribution of an implant-supported overdenture with a Hader bar attachment. The stiffener of the bar attachments was varied and the stress distribution to the bone around the implant was studied. Methods. A CT scan of edentulous mandible was used and three models with 1, 2, and 3 mm thick stiffeners were created and subjected to loads of emulating the masticatory forces. These different models were analyzed by the Finite Element Software (Ansys, Version 8.0) using von Mises stress analysis. Results. The results showed that the maximum stress concentration was seen in the neck of the implant for models A and B. In model C the maximum stress concentration was in the bar attachment making it the model with the best stress distribution, as far as implant failures are concerned. Conclusion. The implant with Hader bar attachment with a 3 mm stiffener is the best in terms of stress distribution, where the stress is concentrated at the bar and stiffener regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3888690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38886902014-01-23 Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis Satheesh Kumar, Preeti Satheesh, Kumar K. S. John, Jins Patil, Geetha Patel, Ruchi ISRN Dent Research Article Background and Objectives. A key factor for the long-term function of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. The effect of adding a stiffener to the tissue side of the Hader bar helps to reduce the transmission of the stresses to the alveolar bone. But the ideal thickness of the stiffener to be attached to the bar is a subject of much debate. This study aims to analyze the force transfer and stress distribution of an implant-supported overdenture with a Hader bar attachment. The stiffener of the bar attachments was varied and the stress distribution to the bone around the implant was studied. Methods. A CT scan of edentulous mandible was used and three models with 1, 2, and 3 mm thick stiffeners were created and subjected to loads of emulating the masticatory forces. These different models were analyzed by the Finite Element Software (Ansys, Version 8.0) using von Mises stress analysis. Results. The results showed that the maximum stress concentration was seen in the neck of the implant for models A and B. In model C the maximum stress concentration was in the bar attachment making it the model with the best stress distribution, as far as implant failures are concerned. Conclusion. The implant with Hader bar attachment with a 3 mm stiffener is the best in terms of stress distribution, where the stress is concentrated at the bar and stiffener regions. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3888690/ /pubmed/24459589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/369147 Text en Copyright © 2013 Preeti Satheesh Kumar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Satheesh Kumar, Preeti
Satheesh, Kumar K. S.
John, Jins
Patil, Geetha
Patel, Ruchi
Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis
title Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis
title_full Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis
title_short Force Transfer and Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Overdenture Retained with a Hader Bar Attachment: A Finite Element Analysis
title_sort force transfer and stress distribution in an implant-supported overdenture retained with a hader bar attachment: a finite element analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/369147
work_keys_str_mv AT satheeshkumarpreeti forcetransferandstressdistributioninanimplantsupportedoverdentureretainedwithahaderbarattachmentafiniteelementanalysis
AT satheeshkumarks forcetransferandstressdistributioninanimplantsupportedoverdentureretainedwithahaderbarattachmentafiniteelementanalysis
AT johnjins forcetransferandstressdistributioninanimplantsupportedoverdentureretainedwithahaderbarattachmentafiniteelementanalysis
AT patilgeetha forcetransferandstressdistributioninanimplantsupportedoverdentureretainedwithahaderbarattachmentafiniteelementanalysis
AT patelruchi forcetransferandstressdistributioninanimplantsupportedoverdentureretainedwithahaderbarattachmentafiniteelementanalysis