Cargando…
What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?
Purpose. To determine the clinical significance of unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing FDG-PET/CT for staging of other primary malignancies without a prior history of prostate carcinoma. Methods. Retrospective search of FDG-PET/CT studies to identify patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/476786 |
_version_ | 1782299113519316992 |
---|---|
author | Bhosale, Priya Balachandran, Aparna Vikram, Raghu Viswanathan, Chitra Macapinlac, Homer Rohren, Eric Prativadi, Ramanujan |
author_facet | Bhosale, Priya Balachandran, Aparna Vikram, Raghu Viswanathan, Chitra Macapinlac, Homer Rohren, Eric Prativadi, Ramanujan |
author_sort | Bhosale, Priya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. To determine the clinical significance of unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing FDG-PET/CT for staging of other primary malignancies without a prior history of prostate carcinoma. Methods. Retrospective search of FDG-PET/CT studies to identify patients with unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate gland, who underwent subsequent biopsy, was performed. 26 patients were identified. Images were reviewed to determine the pattern of uptake within the prostate (focal or diffuse) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). PSA and Gleason scores were recorded. Results. 15/26 (58%) patients were found to have prostate carcinoma. Gleason scores ranged from 6 to 9.9. There was no statistical difference in the pattern of uptake (focal versus diffuse) or the SUVmax. Serum PSA levels with cancer (range, 2–26.8 ng; mean, 10.2 ng) and those without cancer (range, 2–10.5 ng; mean, 2.2 ng) were statistically significant (P < 0.007, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusions. Patients with abnormal uptake in the prostate have a 58% likelihood of occult prostate cancer. In the setting of elevated serum PSA levels, abnormal prostate uptake should therefore be viewed with suspicion and a urology consult should be obtained; however, it is irrelevant in patients with underlying aggressive malignancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3888763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38887632014-01-22 What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies? Bhosale, Priya Balachandran, Aparna Vikram, Raghu Viswanathan, Chitra Macapinlac, Homer Rohren, Eric Prativadi, Ramanujan Int J Mol Imaging Clinical Study Purpose. To determine the clinical significance of unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing FDG-PET/CT for staging of other primary malignancies without a prior history of prostate carcinoma. Methods. Retrospective search of FDG-PET/CT studies to identify patients with unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate gland, who underwent subsequent biopsy, was performed. 26 patients were identified. Images were reviewed to determine the pattern of uptake within the prostate (focal or diffuse) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). PSA and Gleason scores were recorded. Results. 15/26 (58%) patients were found to have prostate carcinoma. Gleason scores ranged from 6 to 9.9. There was no statistical difference in the pattern of uptake (focal versus diffuse) or the SUVmax. Serum PSA levels with cancer (range, 2–26.8 ng; mean, 10.2 ng) and those without cancer (range, 2–10.5 ng; mean, 2.2 ng) were statistically significant (P < 0.007, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusions. Patients with abnormal uptake in the prostate have a 58% likelihood of occult prostate cancer. In the setting of elevated serum PSA levels, abnormal prostate uptake should therefore be viewed with suspicion and a urology consult should be obtained; however, it is irrelevant in patients with underlying aggressive malignancies. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3888763/ /pubmed/24455242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/476786 Text en Copyright © 2013 Priya Bhosale et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Bhosale, Priya Balachandran, Aparna Vikram, Raghu Viswanathan, Chitra Macapinlac, Homer Rohren, Eric Prativadi, Ramanujan What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies? |
title | What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies? |
title_full | What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies? |
title_fullStr | What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies? |
title_full_unstemmed | What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies? |
title_short | What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies? |
title_sort | what is the clinical significance of fdg unexpected uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing pet/ct for other malignancies? |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/476786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhosalepriya whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies AT balachandranaparna whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies AT vikramraghu whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies AT viswanathanchitra whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies AT macapinlachomer whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies AT rohreneric whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies AT prativadiramanujan whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies |