Cargando…

What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?

Purpose. To determine the clinical significance of unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing FDG-PET/CT for staging of other primary malignancies without a prior history of prostate carcinoma. Methods. Retrospective search of FDG-PET/CT studies to identify patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhosale, Priya, Balachandran, Aparna, Vikram, Raghu, Viswanathan, Chitra, Macapinlac, Homer, Rohren, Eric, Prativadi, Ramanujan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/476786
_version_ 1782299113519316992
author Bhosale, Priya
Balachandran, Aparna
Vikram, Raghu
Viswanathan, Chitra
Macapinlac, Homer
Rohren, Eric
Prativadi, Ramanujan
author_facet Bhosale, Priya
Balachandran, Aparna
Vikram, Raghu
Viswanathan, Chitra
Macapinlac, Homer
Rohren, Eric
Prativadi, Ramanujan
author_sort Bhosale, Priya
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To determine the clinical significance of unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing FDG-PET/CT for staging of other primary malignancies without a prior history of prostate carcinoma. Methods. Retrospective search of FDG-PET/CT studies to identify patients with unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate gland, who underwent subsequent biopsy, was performed. 26 patients were identified. Images were reviewed to determine the pattern of uptake within the prostate (focal or diffuse) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). PSA and Gleason scores were recorded. Results. 15/26 (58%) patients were found to have prostate carcinoma. Gleason scores ranged from 6 to 9.9. There was no statistical difference in the pattern of uptake (focal versus diffuse) or the SUVmax. Serum PSA levels with cancer (range, 2–26.8 ng; mean, 10.2 ng) and those without cancer (range, 2–10.5 ng; mean, 2.2 ng) were statistically significant (P < 0.007, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusions. Patients with abnormal uptake in the prostate have a 58% likelihood of occult prostate cancer. In the setting of elevated serum PSA levels, abnormal prostate uptake should therefore be viewed with suspicion and a urology consult should be obtained; however, it is irrelevant in patients with underlying aggressive malignancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3888763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38887632014-01-22 What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies? Bhosale, Priya Balachandran, Aparna Vikram, Raghu Viswanathan, Chitra Macapinlac, Homer Rohren, Eric Prativadi, Ramanujan Int J Mol Imaging Clinical Study Purpose. To determine the clinical significance of unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing FDG-PET/CT for staging of other primary malignancies without a prior history of prostate carcinoma. Methods. Retrospective search of FDG-PET/CT studies to identify patients with unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate gland, who underwent subsequent biopsy, was performed. 26 patients were identified. Images were reviewed to determine the pattern of uptake within the prostate (focal or diffuse) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). PSA and Gleason scores were recorded. Results. 15/26 (58%) patients were found to have prostate carcinoma. Gleason scores ranged from 6 to 9.9. There was no statistical difference in the pattern of uptake (focal versus diffuse) or the SUVmax. Serum PSA levels with cancer (range, 2–26.8 ng; mean, 10.2 ng) and those without cancer (range, 2–10.5 ng; mean, 2.2 ng) were statistically significant (P < 0.007, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusions. Patients with abnormal uptake in the prostate have a 58% likelihood of occult prostate cancer. In the setting of elevated serum PSA levels, abnormal prostate uptake should therefore be viewed with suspicion and a urology consult should be obtained; however, it is irrelevant in patients with underlying aggressive malignancies. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3888763/ /pubmed/24455242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/476786 Text en Copyright © 2013 Priya Bhosale et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Bhosale, Priya
Balachandran, Aparna
Vikram, Raghu
Viswanathan, Chitra
Macapinlac, Homer
Rohren, Eric
Prativadi, Ramanujan
What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?
title What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?
title_full What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?
title_fullStr What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?
title_full_unstemmed What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?
title_short What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?
title_sort what is the clinical significance of fdg unexpected uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing pet/ct for other malignancies?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/476786
work_keys_str_mv AT bhosalepriya whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies
AT balachandranaparna whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies
AT vikramraghu whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies
AT viswanathanchitra whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies
AT macapinlachomer whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies
AT rohreneric whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies
AT prativadiramanujan whatistheclinicalsignificanceoffdgunexpecteduptakeintheprostateinpatientsundergoingpetctforothermalignancies