Cargando…
The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience()
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the investigation of choice for detecting structural lesions that underlie and may accompany epilepsy. Despite advances in imaging technology, 20–30% of patients with refractory focal epilepsy have normal MRI scans. We evaluated the role of repeated imagi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science Publishers
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23538269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.022 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the investigation of choice for detecting structural lesions that underlie and may accompany epilepsy. Despite advances in imaging technology, 20–30% of patients with refractory focal epilepsy have normal MRI scans. We evaluated the role of repeated imaging with improved MRI technology – an increase in field strength from 1.5 T to 3 T and superior head coils – in detecting pathology not previously seen. METHODS: Retrospective review of a large cohort of patients attending a tertiary epilepsy referral centre who underwent MRI at 1.5 T (1995–2004) and subsequently 3 T (2004–2011) with improved head coils. Scan reports were reviewed for the diagnoses and medical notes for the epilepsy classification. RESULTS: 804 patients underwent imaging on both scanners, the majority with focal epilepsy (87%). On repeat scanning at 3 T, 37% of scans were normal and 20% showed incidental findings. Positive findings included hippocampal sclerosis (13%), malformations of cortical development (8%), other abnormalities (4%) and previous surgery (18%). A total of 37 (5%) relevant new diagnoses were made on the 3 T scans not previously seen at 1.5 T. The most common new findings were hippocampal sclerosis, focal cortical dysplasia and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour. These findings affected patient management with several patients undergoing neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: The higher field strength and improved head coils were associated with a clinically relevant increased diagnostic yield from MRI. This highlights the importance of technological advances and suggests that rescanning patients with focal epilepsy and previously negative scans is clinically beneficial. |
---|