Cargando…
The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience()
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the investigation of choice for detecting structural lesions that underlie and may accompany epilepsy. Despite advances in imaging technology, 20–30% of patients with refractory focal epilepsy have normal MRI scans. We evaluated the role of repeated imagi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science Publishers
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23538269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.022 |
_version_ | 1782299129161973760 |
---|---|
author | Winston, Gavin P. Micallef, Caroline Kendell, Brian E. Bartlett, Philippa A. Williams, Elaine J. Burdett, Jane L. Duncan, John S. |
author_facet | Winston, Gavin P. Micallef, Caroline Kendell, Brian E. Bartlett, Philippa A. Williams, Elaine J. Burdett, Jane L. Duncan, John S. |
author_sort | Winston, Gavin P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the investigation of choice for detecting structural lesions that underlie and may accompany epilepsy. Despite advances in imaging technology, 20–30% of patients with refractory focal epilepsy have normal MRI scans. We evaluated the role of repeated imaging with improved MRI technology – an increase in field strength from 1.5 T to 3 T and superior head coils – in detecting pathology not previously seen. METHODS: Retrospective review of a large cohort of patients attending a tertiary epilepsy referral centre who underwent MRI at 1.5 T (1995–2004) and subsequently 3 T (2004–2011) with improved head coils. Scan reports were reviewed for the diagnoses and medical notes for the epilepsy classification. RESULTS: 804 patients underwent imaging on both scanners, the majority with focal epilepsy (87%). On repeat scanning at 3 T, 37% of scans were normal and 20% showed incidental findings. Positive findings included hippocampal sclerosis (13%), malformations of cortical development (8%), other abnormalities (4%) and previous surgery (18%). A total of 37 (5%) relevant new diagnoses were made on the 3 T scans not previously seen at 1.5 T. The most common new findings were hippocampal sclerosis, focal cortical dysplasia and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour. These findings affected patient management with several patients undergoing neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: The higher field strength and improved head coils were associated with a clinically relevant increased diagnostic yield from MRI. This highlights the importance of technological advances and suggests that rescanning patients with focal epilepsy and previously negative scans is clinically beneficial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3888924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Elsevier Science Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38889242014-01-13 The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience() Winston, Gavin P. Micallef, Caroline Kendell, Brian E. Bartlett, Philippa A. Williams, Elaine J. Burdett, Jane L. Duncan, John S. Epilepsy Res Article PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the investigation of choice for detecting structural lesions that underlie and may accompany epilepsy. Despite advances in imaging technology, 20–30% of patients with refractory focal epilepsy have normal MRI scans. We evaluated the role of repeated imaging with improved MRI technology – an increase in field strength from 1.5 T to 3 T and superior head coils – in detecting pathology not previously seen. METHODS: Retrospective review of a large cohort of patients attending a tertiary epilepsy referral centre who underwent MRI at 1.5 T (1995–2004) and subsequently 3 T (2004–2011) with improved head coils. Scan reports were reviewed for the diagnoses and medical notes for the epilepsy classification. RESULTS: 804 patients underwent imaging on both scanners, the majority with focal epilepsy (87%). On repeat scanning at 3 T, 37% of scans were normal and 20% showed incidental findings. Positive findings included hippocampal sclerosis (13%), malformations of cortical development (8%), other abnormalities (4%) and previous surgery (18%). A total of 37 (5%) relevant new diagnoses were made on the 3 T scans not previously seen at 1.5 T. The most common new findings were hippocampal sclerosis, focal cortical dysplasia and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour. These findings affected patient management with several patients undergoing neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: The higher field strength and improved head coils were associated with a clinically relevant increased diagnostic yield from MRI. This highlights the importance of technological advances and suggests that rescanning patients with focal epilepsy and previously negative scans is clinically beneficial. Elsevier Science Publishers 2013-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3888924/ /pubmed/23538269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.022 Text en © 2013 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Winston, Gavin P. Micallef, Caroline Kendell, Brian E. Bartlett, Philippa A. Williams, Elaine J. Burdett, Jane L. Duncan, John S. The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience() |
title | The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience() |
title_full | The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience() |
title_fullStr | The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience() |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience() |
title_short | The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience() |
title_sort | value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23538269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT winstongavinp thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT micallefcaroline thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT kendellbriane thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT bartlettphilippaa thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT williamselainej thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT burdettjanel thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT duncanjohns thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT winstongavinp valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT micallefcaroline valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT kendellbriane valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT bartlettphilippaa valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT williamselainej valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT burdettjanel valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience AT duncanjohns valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience |