Cargando…

The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience()

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the investigation of choice for detecting structural lesions that underlie and may accompany epilepsy. Despite advances in imaging technology, 20–30% of patients with refractory focal epilepsy have normal MRI scans. We evaluated the role of repeated imagi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winston, Gavin P., Micallef, Caroline, Kendell, Brian E., Bartlett, Philippa A., Williams, Elaine J., Burdett, Jane L., Duncan, John S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Publishers 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23538269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.022
_version_ 1782299129161973760
author Winston, Gavin P.
Micallef, Caroline
Kendell, Brian E.
Bartlett, Philippa A.
Williams, Elaine J.
Burdett, Jane L.
Duncan, John S.
author_facet Winston, Gavin P.
Micallef, Caroline
Kendell, Brian E.
Bartlett, Philippa A.
Williams, Elaine J.
Burdett, Jane L.
Duncan, John S.
author_sort Winston, Gavin P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the investigation of choice for detecting structural lesions that underlie and may accompany epilepsy. Despite advances in imaging technology, 20–30% of patients with refractory focal epilepsy have normal MRI scans. We evaluated the role of repeated imaging with improved MRI technology – an increase in field strength from 1.5 T to 3 T and superior head coils – in detecting pathology not previously seen. METHODS: Retrospective review of a large cohort of patients attending a tertiary epilepsy referral centre who underwent MRI at 1.5 T (1995–2004) and subsequently 3 T (2004–2011) with improved head coils. Scan reports were reviewed for the diagnoses and medical notes for the epilepsy classification. RESULTS: 804 patients underwent imaging on both scanners, the majority with focal epilepsy (87%). On repeat scanning at 3 T, 37% of scans were normal and 20% showed incidental findings. Positive findings included hippocampal sclerosis (13%), malformations of cortical development (8%), other abnormalities (4%) and previous surgery (18%). A total of 37 (5%) relevant new diagnoses were made on the 3 T scans not previously seen at 1.5 T. The most common new findings were hippocampal sclerosis, focal cortical dysplasia and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour. These findings affected patient management with several patients undergoing neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: The higher field strength and improved head coils were associated with a clinically relevant increased diagnostic yield from MRI. This highlights the importance of technological advances and suggests that rescanning patients with focal epilepsy and previously negative scans is clinically beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3888924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38889242014-01-13 The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience() Winston, Gavin P. Micallef, Caroline Kendell, Brian E. Bartlett, Philippa A. Williams, Elaine J. Burdett, Jane L. Duncan, John S. Epilepsy Res Article PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the investigation of choice for detecting structural lesions that underlie and may accompany epilepsy. Despite advances in imaging technology, 20–30% of patients with refractory focal epilepsy have normal MRI scans. We evaluated the role of repeated imaging with improved MRI technology – an increase in field strength from 1.5 T to 3 T and superior head coils – in detecting pathology not previously seen. METHODS: Retrospective review of a large cohort of patients attending a tertiary epilepsy referral centre who underwent MRI at 1.5 T (1995–2004) and subsequently 3 T (2004–2011) with improved head coils. Scan reports were reviewed for the diagnoses and medical notes for the epilepsy classification. RESULTS: 804 patients underwent imaging on both scanners, the majority with focal epilepsy (87%). On repeat scanning at 3 T, 37% of scans were normal and 20% showed incidental findings. Positive findings included hippocampal sclerosis (13%), malformations of cortical development (8%), other abnormalities (4%) and previous surgery (18%). A total of 37 (5%) relevant new diagnoses were made on the 3 T scans not previously seen at 1.5 T. The most common new findings were hippocampal sclerosis, focal cortical dysplasia and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour. These findings affected patient management with several patients undergoing neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: The higher field strength and improved head coils were associated with a clinically relevant increased diagnostic yield from MRI. This highlights the importance of technological advances and suggests that rescanning patients with focal epilepsy and previously negative scans is clinically beneficial. Elsevier Science Publishers 2013-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3888924/ /pubmed/23538269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.022 Text en © 2013 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Winston, Gavin P.
Micallef, Caroline
Kendell, Brian E.
Bartlett, Philippa A.
Williams, Elaine J.
Burdett, Jane L.
Duncan, John S.
The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience()
title The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience()
title_full The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience()
title_fullStr The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience()
title_full_unstemmed The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience()
title_short The value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience()
title_sort value of repeat neuroimaging for epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre: 16 years of experience()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23538269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.022
work_keys_str_mv AT winstongavinp thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT micallefcaroline thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT kendellbriane thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT bartlettphilippaa thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT williamselainej thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT burdettjanel thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT duncanjohns thevalueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT winstongavinp valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT micallefcaroline valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT kendellbriane valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT bartlettphilippaa valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT williamselainej valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT burdettjanel valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience
AT duncanjohns valueofrepeatneuroimagingforepilepsyatatertiaryreferralcentre16yearsofexperience