Cargando…

More Than Two HANDs to Tango

Developing a validated tool for the rapid and efficient assessment of cognitive functioning in HIV-infected patients in a typical outpatient clinical setting has been an unmet goal of HIV research since the recognition of the syndrome of HIV-associated dementia (HAD) nearly 20 years ago. In this iss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolson, Dennis, Buch, Shilpa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24233518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11481-013-9513-1
_version_ 1782299166456676352
author Kolson, Dennis
Buch, Shilpa
author_facet Kolson, Dennis
Buch, Shilpa
author_sort Kolson, Dennis
collection PubMed
description Developing a validated tool for the rapid and efficient assessment of cognitive functioning in HIV-infected patients in a typical outpatient clinical setting has been an unmet goal of HIV research since the recognition of the syndrome of HIV-associated dementia (HAD) nearly 20 years ago. In this issue of JNIP Cross et al. report the application of the International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) in a U.S.-based urban outpatient clinic to evaluate its utility as a substitute for the more time- and effort-demanding formalized testing criteria known as the Frascati criteria that was developed in 2007 to define the syndrome of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). In this study an unselected cohort of 507 individuals (68 % African American) that were assessed using the IHDS in a cross-sectional study revealed a 41 % prevalence of cognitive impairment (labeled ‘symptomatic HAND’) that was associated with African American race, older age, unemployment, education level, and depression. While the associations between cognitive impairment and older age, education, unemployment status and depression in HIV-infected patients are not surprising, the association with African American ancestry and cognitive impairment in the setting of HIV infection is a novel finding of this study. This commentary discusses several important issues raised by the study, including the pitfalls of assessing cognitive functioning with rapid screening tools, cognitive testing criteria, normative testing control groups, accounting for HAND co-morbidity factors, considerations for clinical trials assessing HAND, and selective population vulnerability to HAND.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3889221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38892212014-01-14 More Than Two HANDs to Tango Kolson, Dennis Buch, Shilpa J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Commentary Developing a validated tool for the rapid and efficient assessment of cognitive functioning in HIV-infected patients in a typical outpatient clinical setting has been an unmet goal of HIV research since the recognition of the syndrome of HIV-associated dementia (HAD) nearly 20 years ago. In this issue of JNIP Cross et al. report the application of the International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) in a U.S.-based urban outpatient clinic to evaluate its utility as a substitute for the more time- and effort-demanding formalized testing criteria known as the Frascati criteria that was developed in 2007 to define the syndrome of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). In this study an unselected cohort of 507 individuals (68 % African American) that were assessed using the IHDS in a cross-sectional study revealed a 41 % prevalence of cognitive impairment (labeled ‘symptomatic HAND’) that was associated with African American race, older age, unemployment, education level, and depression. While the associations between cognitive impairment and older age, education, unemployment status and depression in HIV-infected patients are not surprising, the association with African American ancestry and cognitive impairment in the setting of HIV infection is a novel finding of this study. This commentary discusses several important issues raised by the study, including the pitfalls of assessing cognitive functioning with rapid screening tools, cognitive testing criteria, normative testing control groups, accounting for HAND co-morbidity factors, considerations for clinical trials assessing HAND, and selective population vulnerability to HAND. Springer US 2013-11-15 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3889221/ /pubmed/24233518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11481-013-9513-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Kolson, Dennis
Buch, Shilpa
More Than Two HANDs to Tango
title More Than Two HANDs to Tango
title_full More Than Two HANDs to Tango
title_fullStr More Than Two HANDs to Tango
title_full_unstemmed More Than Two HANDs to Tango
title_short More Than Two HANDs to Tango
title_sort more than two hands to tango
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24233518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11481-013-9513-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kolsondennis morethantwohandstotango
AT buchshilpa morethantwohandstotango