Cargando…
Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities
PURPOSE: Intranasal deposition of aerosols is often studied using in vitro nasal cavity models. However, the relevance of these models to predict in vivo human deposition has not been validated. This study compared in vivo nasal aerosol deposition and in vitro deposition in a human plastinated head...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24065586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-013-1157-6 |
_version_ | 1782299172875010048 |
---|---|
author | Le Guellec, Sandrine Le Pennec, Deborah Gatier, Stephane Leclerc, Lara Cabrera, Maria Pourchez, Jeremie Diot, Patrice Reychler, Gregory Pitance, Laurent Durand, Marc Jamar, François Vecellio, Laurent |
author_facet | Le Guellec, Sandrine Le Pennec, Deborah Gatier, Stephane Leclerc, Lara Cabrera, Maria Pourchez, Jeremie Diot, Patrice Reychler, Gregory Pitance, Laurent Durand, Marc Jamar, François Vecellio, Laurent |
author_sort | Le Guellec, Sandrine |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Intranasal deposition of aerosols is often studied using in vitro nasal cavity models. However, the relevance of these models to predict in vivo human deposition has not been validated. This study compared in vivo nasal aerosol deposition and in vitro deposition in a human plastinated head model (NC1) and its replica constructed from CT-scan (NC2). METHODS: Two nebulizers (Atomisor Sonique® and Easynose®) were used to administer a 5.6 μm aerosol of (99m)Tc-DTPA to seven healthy volunteers and to the nasal models. Aerosol deposition was quantified by γ-scintigraphy in the nasal, upper nasal cavity and maxillary sinus (MS) regions. The distribution of aerosol deposition was determined along three nasal cavity axes (x, y and z). RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding aerosol deposition between the volunteers and NC1. Aerosol deposition was significantly lower in NC2 than in volunteers regarding nasal region (p < 0.05) but was similar for the upper nasal cavity and MS regions. Mean aerosol distribution for NC1 came within the standard deviation (SD) of in vivo distribution, whereas that of NC2 was outside the in vivo SD for x and y axes. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, nasal models can be used to predict aerosol deposition produced by nebulizers, but their performance depends on their design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3889297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38892972014-01-14 Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities Le Guellec, Sandrine Le Pennec, Deborah Gatier, Stephane Leclerc, Lara Cabrera, Maria Pourchez, Jeremie Diot, Patrice Reychler, Gregory Pitance, Laurent Durand, Marc Jamar, François Vecellio, Laurent Pharm Res Research Paper PURPOSE: Intranasal deposition of aerosols is often studied using in vitro nasal cavity models. However, the relevance of these models to predict in vivo human deposition has not been validated. This study compared in vivo nasal aerosol deposition and in vitro deposition in a human plastinated head model (NC1) and its replica constructed from CT-scan (NC2). METHODS: Two nebulizers (Atomisor Sonique® and Easynose®) were used to administer a 5.6 μm aerosol of (99m)Tc-DTPA to seven healthy volunteers and to the nasal models. Aerosol deposition was quantified by γ-scintigraphy in the nasal, upper nasal cavity and maxillary sinus (MS) regions. The distribution of aerosol deposition was determined along three nasal cavity axes (x, y and z). RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding aerosol deposition between the volunteers and NC1. Aerosol deposition was significantly lower in NC2 than in volunteers regarding nasal region (p < 0.05) but was similar for the upper nasal cavity and MS regions. Mean aerosol distribution for NC1 came within the standard deviation (SD) of in vivo distribution, whereas that of NC2 was outside the in vivo SD for x and y axes. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, nasal models can be used to predict aerosol deposition produced by nebulizers, but their performance depends on their design. Springer US 2013-09-25 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3889297/ /pubmed/24065586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-013-1157-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Le Guellec, Sandrine Le Pennec, Deborah Gatier, Stephane Leclerc, Lara Cabrera, Maria Pourchez, Jeremie Diot, Patrice Reychler, Gregory Pitance, Laurent Durand, Marc Jamar, François Vecellio, Laurent Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities |
title | Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities |
title_full | Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities |
title_fullStr | Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities |
title_short | Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities |
title_sort | validation of anatomical models to study aerosol deposition in human nasal cavities |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24065586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-013-1157-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leguellecsandrine validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT lepennecdeborah validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT gatierstephane validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT leclerclara validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT cabreramaria validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT pourchezjeremie validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT diotpatrice validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT reychlergregory validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT pitancelaurent validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT durandmarc validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT jamarfrancois validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities AT vecelliolaurent validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities |