Cargando…

Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities

PURPOSE: Intranasal deposition of aerosols is often studied using in vitro nasal cavity models. However, the relevance of these models to predict in vivo human deposition has not been validated. This study compared in vivo nasal aerosol deposition and in vitro deposition in a human plastinated head...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Guellec, Sandrine, Le Pennec, Deborah, Gatier, Stephane, Leclerc, Lara, Cabrera, Maria, Pourchez, Jeremie, Diot, Patrice, Reychler, Gregory, Pitance, Laurent, Durand, Marc, Jamar, François, Vecellio, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24065586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-013-1157-6
_version_ 1782299172875010048
author Le Guellec, Sandrine
Le Pennec, Deborah
Gatier, Stephane
Leclerc, Lara
Cabrera, Maria
Pourchez, Jeremie
Diot, Patrice
Reychler, Gregory
Pitance, Laurent
Durand, Marc
Jamar, François
Vecellio, Laurent
author_facet Le Guellec, Sandrine
Le Pennec, Deborah
Gatier, Stephane
Leclerc, Lara
Cabrera, Maria
Pourchez, Jeremie
Diot, Patrice
Reychler, Gregory
Pitance, Laurent
Durand, Marc
Jamar, François
Vecellio, Laurent
author_sort Le Guellec, Sandrine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Intranasal deposition of aerosols is often studied using in vitro nasal cavity models. However, the relevance of these models to predict in vivo human deposition has not been validated. This study compared in vivo nasal aerosol deposition and in vitro deposition in a human plastinated head model (NC1) and its replica constructed from CT-scan (NC2). METHODS: Two nebulizers (Atomisor Sonique® and Easynose®) were used to administer a 5.6 μm aerosol of (99m)Tc-DTPA to seven healthy volunteers and to the nasal models. Aerosol deposition was quantified by γ-scintigraphy in the nasal, upper nasal cavity and maxillary sinus (MS) regions. The distribution of aerosol deposition was determined along three nasal cavity axes (x, y and z). RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding aerosol deposition between the volunteers and NC1. Aerosol deposition was significantly lower in NC2 than in volunteers regarding nasal region (p < 0.05) but was similar for the upper nasal cavity and MS regions. Mean aerosol distribution for NC1 came within the standard deviation (SD) of in vivo distribution, whereas that of NC2 was outside the in vivo SD for x and y axes. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, nasal models can be used to predict aerosol deposition produced by nebulizers, but their performance depends on their design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3889297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38892972014-01-14 Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities Le Guellec, Sandrine Le Pennec, Deborah Gatier, Stephane Leclerc, Lara Cabrera, Maria Pourchez, Jeremie Diot, Patrice Reychler, Gregory Pitance, Laurent Durand, Marc Jamar, François Vecellio, Laurent Pharm Res Research Paper PURPOSE: Intranasal deposition of aerosols is often studied using in vitro nasal cavity models. However, the relevance of these models to predict in vivo human deposition has not been validated. This study compared in vivo nasal aerosol deposition and in vitro deposition in a human plastinated head model (NC1) and its replica constructed from CT-scan (NC2). METHODS: Two nebulizers (Atomisor Sonique® and Easynose®) were used to administer a 5.6 μm aerosol of (99m)Tc-DTPA to seven healthy volunteers and to the nasal models. Aerosol deposition was quantified by γ-scintigraphy in the nasal, upper nasal cavity and maxillary sinus (MS) regions. The distribution of aerosol deposition was determined along three nasal cavity axes (x, y and z). RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding aerosol deposition between the volunteers and NC1. Aerosol deposition was significantly lower in NC2 than in volunteers regarding nasal region (p < 0.05) but was similar for the upper nasal cavity and MS regions. Mean aerosol distribution for NC1 came within the standard deviation (SD) of in vivo distribution, whereas that of NC2 was outside the in vivo SD for x and y axes. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, nasal models can be used to predict aerosol deposition produced by nebulizers, but their performance depends on their design. Springer US 2013-09-25 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3889297/ /pubmed/24065586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-013-1157-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Le Guellec, Sandrine
Le Pennec, Deborah
Gatier, Stephane
Leclerc, Lara
Cabrera, Maria
Pourchez, Jeremie
Diot, Patrice
Reychler, Gregory
Pitance, Laurent
Durand, Marc
Jamar, François
Vecellio, Laurent
Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities
title Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities
title_full Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities
title_fullStr Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities
title_short Validation of Anatomical Models to Study Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal Cavities
title_sort validation of anatomical models to study aerosol deposition in human nasal cavities
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24065586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-013-1157-6
work_keys_str_mv AT leguellecsandrine validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT lepennecdeborah validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT gatierstephane validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT leclerclara validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT cabreramaria validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT pourchezjeremie validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT diotpatrice validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT reychlergregory validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT pitancelaurent validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT durandmarc validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT jamarfrancois validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities
AT vecelliolaurent validationofanatomicalmodelstostudyaerosoldepositioninhumannasalcavities