Cargando…

Safety and Effectiveness of Switching from a Basal-only to Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Insulin Regimen

PURPOSE: This sub-analysis of the A(1)chieve study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of changing from a basal-only insulin regimen to biphasic insulin aspart 30. METHODS: A(1)chieve was an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, 24-week study in people with type...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haddad, Jihad, Khoshniatnikoo, Mohsen, Benabbas, Youcef, Guler, Serdar, Prusty, Vinay, Soewondo, Pradana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23846835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-013-0032-0
_version_ 1782299178742841344
author Haddad, Jihad
Khoshniatnikoo, Mohsen
Benabbas, Youcef
Guler, Serdar
Prusty, Vinay
Soewondo, Pradana
author_facet Haddad, Jihad
Khoshniatnikoo, Mohsen
Benabbas, Youcef
Guler, Serdar
Prusty, Vinay
Soewondo, Pradana
author_sort Haddad, Jihad
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This sub-analysis of the A(1)chieve study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of changing from a basal-only insulin regimen to biphasic insulin aspart 30. METHODS: A(1)chieve was an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, 24-week study in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus starting/switching to therapy with biphasic insulin aspart 30, insulin detemir, or insulin aspart (alone/in combination) in routine clinical practice. This sub-analysis evaluated the safety and effectiveness of switching from basal insulin with either insulin glargine (GLA group) or insulin neutral protamine Hagedorn (NEU group) to biphasic insulin aspart 30. RESULTS: A total of 2,818 participants received biphasic insulin aspart 30 (1,395 in the GLA group and 1,423 in the NEU group). After 24 weeks of treatment, there were significant reductions in the proportion of patients with at least one hypoglycemia event: total [baseline vs. 24 weeks: 15.5% vs. 9.7% (p < 0.001) and 12.3% vs. 9.9% (p < 0.05), in NEU and GLA groups, respectively], major [2.5% vs. 0.08% (p < 0.001) and 1.2% vs. 0.08% (p < 0.001), in NEU and GLA groups, respectively] and nocturnal hypoglycemia [7.2% vs. 3.5% (p < 0.001) and 5.4% vs. 3.9% (p < 0.05), in NEU and GLA groups, respectively]. After 24 weeks of biphasic insulin aspart 30 there were statistically significant improvements from baseline in glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, and post-prandial plasma glucose levels (p < 0.001) and in health-related quality of life (p < 0.001) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic insulin aspart 30 may benefit patients with poor glycemic control on basal insulin regimens who are seeking to change treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3889323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38893232014-01-14 Safety and Effectiveness of Switching from a Basal-only to Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Insulin Regimen Haddad, Jihad Khoshniatnikoo, Mohsen Benabbas, Youcef Guler, Serdar Prusty, Vinay Soewondo, Pradana Diabetes Ther Original Research PURPOSE: This sub-analysis of the A(1)chieve study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of changing from a basal-only insulin regimen to biphasic insulin aspart 30. METHODS: A(1)chieve was an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, 24-week study in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus starting/switching to therapy with biphasic insulin aspart 30, insulin detemir, or insulin aspart (alone/in combination) in routine clinical practice. This sub-analysis evaluated the safety and effectiveness of switching from basal insulin with either insulin glargine (GLA group) or insulin neutral protamine Hagedorn (NEU group) to biphasic insulin aspart 30. RESULTS: A total of 2,818 participants received biphasic insulin aspart 30 (1,395 in the GLA group and 1,423 in the NEU group). After 24 weeks of treatment, there were significant reductions in the proportion of patients with at least one hypoglycemia event: total [baseline vs. 24 weeks: 15.5% vs. 9.7% (p < 0.001) and 12.3% vs. 9.9% (p < 0.05), in NEU and GLA groups, respectively], major [2.5% vs. 0.08% (p < 0.001) and 1.2% vs. 0.08% (p < 0.001), in NEU and GLA groups, respectively] and nocturnal hypoglycemia [7.2% vs. 3.5% (p < 0.001) and 5.4% vs. 3.9% (p < 0.05), in NEU and GLA groups, respectively]. After 24 weeks of biphasic insulin aspart 30 there were statistically significant improvements from baseline in glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, and post-prandial plasma glucose levels (p < 0.001) and in health-related quality of life (p < 0.001) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic insulin aspart 30 may benefit patients with poor glycemic control on basal insulin regimens who are seeking to change treatment. Springer Healthcare 2013-07-12 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3889323/ /pubmed/23846835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-013-0032-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Haddad, Jihad
Khoshniatnikoo, Mohsen
Benabbas, Youcef
Guler, Serdar
Prusty, Vinay
Soewondo, Pradana
Safety and Effectiveness of Switching from a Basal-only to Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Insulin Regimen
title Safety and Effectiveness of Switching from a Basal-only to Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Insulin Regimen
title_full Safety and Effectiveness of Switching from a Basal-only to Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Insulin Regimen
title_fullStr Safety and Effectiveness of Switching from a Basal-only to Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Insulin Regimen
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Effectiveness of Switching from a Basal-only to Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Insulin Regimen
title_short Safety and Effectiveness of Switching from a Basal-only to Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Insulin Regimen
title_sort safety and effectiveness of switching from a basal-only to biphasic insulin aspart 30 insulin regimen
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23846835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-013-0032-0
work_keys_str_mv AT haddadjihad safetyandeffectivenessofswitchingfromabasalonlytobiphasicinsulinaspart30insulinregimen
AT khoshniatnikoomohsen safetyandeffectivenessofswitchingfromabasalonlytobiphasicinsulinaspart30insulinregimen
AT benabbasyoucef safetyandeffectivenessofswitchingfromabasalonlytobiphasicinsulinaspart30insulinregimen
AT gulerserdar safetyandeffectivenessofswitchingfromabasalonlytobiphasicinsulinaspart30insulinregimen
AT prustyvinay safetyandeffectivenessofswitchingfromabasalonlytobiphasicinsulinaspart30insulinregimen
AT soewondopradana safetyandeffectivenessofswitchingfromabasalonlytobiphasicinsulinaspart30insulinregimen