Cargando…

The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs

PURPOSE: The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model provides a framework outlining essential components of knowledge generation and exchange. The purpose of this research was to illustrate how the Model makes explicit the different contextual aspects implicit in the planning and implement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, A. Fuchsia, Smillie, Kirsten, Chan, Vivian, Cook, Sandra, Kazanjian, Arminee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24068550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1982-5
_version_ 1782299203756621824
author Howard, A. Fuchsia
Smillie, Kirsten
Chan, Vivian
Cook, Sandra
Kazanjian, Arminee
author_facet Howard, A. Fuchsia
Smillie, Kirsten
Chan, Vivian
Cook, Sandra
Kazanjian, Arminee
author_sort Howard, A. Fuchsia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model provides a framework outlining essential components of knowledge generation and exchange. The purpose of this research was to illustrate how the Model makes explicit the different contextual aspects implicit in the planning and implementation of two cancer navigation programs in Canada. METHODS: The KE-DS Model guided the collection and analysis of interviews with program personnel and narrative data. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted wherein we compared and contrasted the planning and implementation of these two navigation programs. RESULTS: The planning and implementation of these two programs was conceptualized differently and adapted to meet local contingencies. The KE-DS Model highlighted three factors that influenced program delivery. First, the structure of health services was shaped by the interaction of professionals and services operating in the region, and the existing health services influenced the program’s approach to navigation. Second, while there were similarities in the professional roles and responsibilities of the navigators, these roles and responsibilities also reflected local context in their approaches to patient assessment, referral, education, coordination of services, and advocacy. Third, these two distinct approaches to navigation have responded to the needs of diverse populations being served by improving access to care. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence generated using the KE-DS Model could ensure a more robust and structured approach to the planning and implementation of future navigation programs. The Model prompts users to make explicit the different types of evidence utilized during program planning and implementation. The systematic collection of new information on program implementation using the KE-DS Model in future initiatives will contribute to an improved understanding of the science of knowledge exchange.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3889872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38898722014-01-28 The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs Howard, A. Fuchsia Smillie, Kirsten Chan, Vivian Cook, Sandra Kazanjian, Arminee Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model provides a framework outlining essential components of knowledge generation and exchange. The purpose of this research was to illustrate how the Model makes explicit the different contextual aspects implicit in the planning and implementation of two cancer navigation programs in Canada. METHODS: The KE-DS Model guided the collection and analysis of interviews with program personnel and narrative data. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted wherein we compared and contrasted the planning and implementation of these two navigation programs. RESULTS: The planning and implementation of these two programs was conceptualized differently and adapted to meet local contingencies. The KE-DS Model highlighted three factors that influenced program delivery. First, the structure of health services was shaped by the interaction of professionals and services operating in the region, and the existing health services influenced the program’s approach to navigation. Second, while there were similarities in the professional roles and responsibilities of the navigators, these roles and responsibilities also reflected local context in their approaches to patient assessment, referral, education, coordination of services, and advocacy. Third, these two distinct approaches to navigation have responded to the needs of diverse populations being served by improving access to care. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence generated using the KE-DS Model could ensure a more robust and structured approach to the planning and implementation of future navigation programs. The Model prompts users to make explicit the different types of evidence utilized during program planning and implementation. The systematic collection of new information on program implementation using the KE-DS Model in future initiatives will contribute to an improved understanding of the science of knowledge exchange. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-09-26 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3889872/ /pubmed/24068550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1982-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Howard, A. Fuchsia
Smillie, Kirsten
Chan, Vivian
Cook, Sandra
Kazanjian, Arminee
The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs
title The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs
title_full The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs
title_fullStr The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs
title_full_unstemmed The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs
title_short The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs
title_sort knowledge exchange–decision support model: application to cancer navigation programs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24068550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1982-5
work_keys_str_mv AT howardafuchsia theknowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms
AT smilliekirsten theknowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms
AT chanvivian theknowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms
AT cooksandra theknowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms
AT kazanjianarminee theknowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms
AT howardafuchsia knowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms
AT smilliekirsten knowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms
AT chanvivian knowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms
AT cooksandra knowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms
AT kazanjianarminee knowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms