Cargando…
The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs
PURPOSE: The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model provides a framework outlining essential components of knowledge generation and exchange. The purpose of this research was to illustrate how the Model makes explicit the different contextual aspects implicit in the planning and implement...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24068550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1982-5 |
_version_ | 1782299203756621824 |
---|---|
author | Howard, A. Fuchsia Smillie, Kirsten Chan, Vivian Cook, Sandra Kazanjian, Arminee |
author_facet | Howard, A. Fuchsia Smillie, Kirsten Chan, Vivian Cook, Sandra Kazanjian, Arminee |
author_sort | Howard, A. Fuchsia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model provides a framework outlining essential components of knowledge generation and exchange. The purpose of this research was to illustrate how the Model makes explicit the different contextual aspects implicit in the planning and implementation of two cancer navigation programs in Canada. METHODS: The KE-DS Model guided the collection and analysis of interviews with program personnel and narrative data. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted wherein we compared and contrasted the planning and implementation of these two navigation programs. RESULTS: The planning and implementation of these two programs was conceptualized differently and adapted to meet local contingencies. The KE-DS Model highlighted three factors that influenced program delivery. First, the structure of health services was shaped by the interaction of professionals and services operating in the region, and the existing health services influenced the program’s approach to navigation. Second, while there were similarities in the professional roles and responsibilities of the navigators, these roles and responsibilities also reflected local context in their approaches to patient assessment, referral, education, coordination of services, and advocacy. Third, these two distinct approaches to navigation have responded to the needs of diverse populations being served by improving access to care. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence generated using the KE-DS Model could ensure a more robust and structured approach to the planning and implementation of future navigation programs. The Model prompts users to make explicit the different types of evidence utilized during program planning and implementation. The systematic collection of new information on program implementation using the KE-DS Model in future initiatives will contribute to an improved understanding of the science of knowledge exchange. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3889872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38898722014-01-28 The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs Howard, A. Fuchsia Smillie, Kirsten Chan, Vivian Cook, Sandra Kazanjian, Arminee Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model provides a framework outlining essential components of knowledge generation and exchange. The purpose of this research was to illustrate how the Model makes explicit the different contextual aspects implicit in the planning and implementation of two cancer navigation programs in Canada. METHODS: The KE-DS Model guided the collection and analysis of interviews with program personnel and narrative data. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted wherein we compared and contrasted the planning and implementation of these two navigation programs. RESULTS: The planning and implementation of these two programs was conceptualized differently and adapted to meet local contingencies. The KE-DS Model highlighted three factors that influenced program delivery. First, the structure of health services was shaped by the interaction of professionals and services operating in the region, and the existing health services influenced the program’s approach to navigation. Second, while there were similarities in the professional roles and responsibilities of the navigators, these roles and responsibilities also reflected local context in their approaches to patient assessment, referral, education, coordination of services, and advocacy. Third, these two distinct approaches to navigation have responded to the needs of diverse populations being served by improving access to care. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence generated using the KE-DS Model could ensure a more robust and structured approach to the planning and implementation of future navigation programs. The Model prompts users to make explicit the different types of evidence utilized during program planning and implementation. The systematic collection of new information on program implementation using the KE-DS Model in future initiatives will contribute to an improved understanding of the science of knowledge exchange. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-09-26 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3889872/ /pubmed/24068550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1982-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Howard, A. Fuchsia Smillie, Kirsten Chan, Vivian Cook, Sandra Kazanjian, Arminee The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs |
title | The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs |
title_full | The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs |
title_fullStr | The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs |
title_full_unstemmed | The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs |
title_short | The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs |
title_sort | knowledge exchange–decision support model: application to cancer navigation programs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24068550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1982-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT howardafuchsia theknowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms AT smilliekirsten theknowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms AT chanvivian theknowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms AT cooksandra theknowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms AT kazanjianarminee theknowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms AT howardafuchsia knowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms AT smilliekirsten knowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms AT chanvivian knowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms AT cooksandra knowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms AT kazanjianarminee knowledgeexchangedecisionsupportmodelapplicationtocancernavigationprograms |