Cargando…

Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures

Correlations between ten-channel EEGs obtained from thirteen healthy adult participants were investigated. Signals were obtained in two behavioral states: eyes open no task and eyes closed no task. Four time domain measures were compared: Pearson product moment correlation, Spearman rank order corre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonita, J. D., Ambolode, L. C. C., Rosenberg, B. M., Cellucci, C. J., Watanabe, T. A. A., Rapp, P. E., Albano, A. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11571-013-9267-8
_version_ 1782299221492236288
author Bonita, J. D.
Ambolode, L. C. C.
Rosenberg, B. M.
Cellucci, C. J.
Watanabe, T. A. A.
Rapp, P. E.
Albano, A. M.
author_facet Bonita, J. D.
Ambolode, L. C. C.
Rosenberg, B. M.
Cellucci, C. J.
Watanabe, T. A. A.
Rapp, P. E.
Albano, A. M.
author_sort Bonita, J. D.
collection PubMed
description Correlations between ten-channel EEGs obtained from thirteen healthy adult participants were investigated. Signals were obtained in two behavioral states: eyes open no task and eyes closed no task. Four time domain measures were compared: Pearson product moment correlation, Spearman rank order correlation, Kendall rank order correlation and mutual information. The psychophysiological utility of each measure was assessed by determining its ability to discriminate between conditions. The sensitivity to epoch length was assessed by repeating calculations with 1, 2, 3, …, 8 s epochs. The robustness to noise was assessed by performing calculations with noise corrupted versions of the original signals (SNRs of 0, 5 and 10 dB). Three results were obtained in these calculations. First, mutual information effectively discriminated between states with less data. Pearson, Spearman and Kendall failed to discriminate between states with a 1 s epoch, while a statistically significant separation was obtained with mutual information. Second, at all epoch durations tested, the measure of between-state discrimination was greater for mutual information. Third, discrimination based on mutual information was more robust to noise. The limitations of this study are discussed. Further comparisons should be made with frequency domain measures, with measures constructed with embedded data and with the maximal information coefficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3890093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38900932014-01-24 Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures Bonita, J. D. Ambolode, L. C. C. Rosenberg, B. M. Cellucci, C. J. Watanabe, T. A. A. Rapp, P. E. Albano, A. M. Cogn Neurodyn Review Paper Correlations between ten-channel EEGs obtained from thirteen healthy adult participants were investigated. Signals were obtained in two behavioral states: eyes open no task and eyes closed no task. Four time domain measures were compared: Pearson product moment correlation, Spearman rank order correlation, Kendall rank order correlation and mutual information. The psychophysiological utility of each measure was assessed by determining its ability to discriminate between conditions. The sensitivity to epoch length was assessed by repeating calculations with 1, 2, 3, …, 8 s epochs. The robustness to noise was assessed by performing calculations with noise corrupted versions of the original signals (SNRs of 0, 5 and 10 dB). Three results were obtained in these calculations. First, mutual information effectively discriminated between states with less data. Pearson, Spearman and Kendall failed to discriminate between states with a 1 s epoch, while a statistically significant separation was obtained with mutual information. Second, at all epoch durations tested, the measure of between-state discrimination was greater for mutual information. Third, discrimination based on mutual information was more robust to noise. The limitations of this study are discussed. Further comparisons should be made with frequency domain measures, with measures constructed with embedded data and with the maximal information coefficient. Springer Netherlands 2013-09-04 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3890093/ /pubmed/24465281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11571-013-9267-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Bonita, J. D.
Ambolode, L. C. C.
Rosenberg, B. M.
Cellucci, C. J.
Watanabe, T. A. A.
Rapp, P. E.
Albano, A. M.
Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures
title Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures
title_full Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures
title_fullStr Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures
title_full_unstemmed Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures
title_short Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures
title_sort time domain measures of inter-channel eeg correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11571-013-9267-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bonitajd timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures
AT ambolodelcc timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures
AT rosenbergbm timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures
AT celluccicj timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures
AT watanabetaa timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures
AT rapppe timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures
AT albanoam timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures