Cargando…
Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures
Correlations between ten-channel EEGs obtained from thirteen healthy adult participants were investigated. Signals were obtained in two behavioral states: eyes open no task and eyes closed no task. Four time domain measures were compared: Pearson product moment correlation, Spearman rank order corre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11571-013-9267-8 |
_version_ | 1782299221492236288 |
---|---|
author | Bonita, J. D. Ambolode, L. C. C. Rosenberg, B. M. Cellucci, C. J. Watanabe, T. A. A. Rapp, P. E. Albano, A. M. |
author_facet | Bonita, J. D. Ambolode, L. C. C. Rosenberg, B. M. Cellucci, C. J. Watanabe, T. A. A. Rapp, P. E. Albano, A. M. |
author_sort | Bonita, J. D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Correlations between ten-channel EEGs obtained from thirteen healthy adult participants were investigated. Signals were obtained in two behavioral states: eyes open no task and eyes closed no task. Four time domain measures were compared: Pearson product moment correlation, Spearman rank order correlation, Kendall rank order correlation and mutual information. The psychophysiological utility of each measure was assessed by determining its ability to discriminate between conditions. The sensitivity to epoch length was assessed by repeating calculations with 1, 2, 3, …, 8 s epochs. The robustness to noise was assessed by performing calculations with noise corrupted versions of the original signals (SNRs of 0, 5 and 10 dB). Three results were obtained in these calculations. First, mutual information effectively discriminated between states with less data. Pearson, Spearman and Kendall failed to discriminate between states with a 1 s epoch, while a statistically significant separation was obtained with mutual information. Second, at all epoch durations tested, the measure of between-state discrimination was greater for mutual information. Third, discrimination based on mutual information was more robust to noise. The limitations of this study are discussed. Further comparisons should be made with frequency domain measures, with measures constructed with embedded data and with the maximal information coefficient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3890093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38900932014-01-24 Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures Bonita, J. D. Ambolode, L. C. C. Rosenberg, B. M. Cellucci, C. J. Watanabe, T. A. A. Rapp, P. E. Albano, A. M. Cogn Neurodyn Review Paper Correlations between ten-channel EEGs obtained from thirteen healthy adult participants were investigated. Signals were obtained in two behavioral states: eyes open no task and eyes closed no task. Four time domain measures were compared: Pearson product moment correlation, Spearman rank order correlation, Kendall rank order correlation and mutual information. The psychophysiological utility of each measure was assessed by determining its ability to discriminate between conditions. The sensitivity to epoch length was assessed by repeating calculations with 1, 2, 3, …, 8 s epochs. The robustness to noise was assessed by performing calculations with noise corrupted versions of the original signals (SNRs of 0, 5 and 10 dB). Three results were obtained in these calculations. First, mutual information effectively discriminated between states with less data. Pearson, Spearman and Kendall failed to discriminate between states with a 1 s epoch, while a statistically significant separation was obtained with mutual information. Second, at all epoch durations tested, the measure of between-state discrimination was greater for mutual information. Third, discrimination based on mutual information was more robust to noise. The limitations of this study are discussed. Further comparisons should be made with frequency domain measures, with measures constructed with embedded data and with the maximal information coefficient. Springer Netherlands 2013-09-04 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3890093/ /pubmed/24465281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11571-013-9267-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Bonita, J. D. Ambolode, L. C. C. Rosenberg, B. M. Cellucci, C. J. Watanabe, T. A. A. Rapp, P. E. Albano, A. M. Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures |
title | Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures |
title_full | Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures |
title_fullStr | Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures |
title_short | Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures |
title_sort | time domain measures of inter-channel eeg correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11571-013-9267-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonitajd timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures AT ambolodelcc timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures AT rosenbergbm timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures AT celluccicj timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures AT watanabetaa timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures AT rapppe timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures AT albanoam timedomainmeasuresofinterchanneleegcorrelationsacomparisonoflinearnonparametricandnonlinearmeasures |