Cargando…

What Magnitude Are Observed Non-Target Impacts from Weed Biocontrol?

A systematic review focused by plant on non-target impacts from agents deliberately introduced for the biological control of weeds found significant non-target impacts to be rare. The magnitude of direct impact of 43 biocontrol agents on 140 non-target plants was retrospectively categorized using a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suckling, David Maxwell, Sforza, René François Henri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24454755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084847
_version_ 1782299231701172224
author Suckling, David Maxwell
Sforza, René François Henri
author_facet Suckling, David Maxwell
Sforza, René François Henri
author_sort Suckling, David Maxwell
collection PubMed
description A systematic review focused by plant on non-target impacts from agents deliberately introduced for the biological control of weeds found significant non-target impacts to be rare. The magnitude of direct impact of 43 biocontrol agents on 140 non-target plants was retrospectively categorized using a risk management framework for ecological impacts of invasive species (minimal, minor, moderate, major, massive). The vast majority of agents introduced for classical biological control of weeds (>99% of 512 agents released) have had no known significant adverse effects on non-target plants thus far; major effects suppressing non-target plant populations could be expected to be detectable. Most direct non-target impacts on plants (91.6%) were categorized as minimal or minor in magnitude with no known adverse long-term impact on non-target plant populations, but a few cacti and thistles are affected at moderate (n = 3), major (n = 7) to massive (n = 1) scale. The largest direct impacts are from two agents (Cactoblastis cactorum on native cacti and Rhinocyllus conicus on native thistles), but these introductions would not be permitted today as more balanced attitudes exist to plant biodiversity, driven by both society and the scientific community. Our analysis shows (as far as is known), weed biological control agents have a biosafety track record of >99% of cases avoiding significant non-target impacts on plant populations. Some impacts could have been overlooked, but this seems unlikely to change the basic distribution of very limited adverse effects. Fewer non-target impacts can be expected in future because of improved science and incorporation of wider values. Failure to use biological control represents a significant opportunity cost from the certainty of ongoing adverse impacts from invasive weeds. It is recommended that a simple five-step scale be used to better communicate the risk of consequences from both action (classical biological control) and no action (ongoing impacts from invasive weeds).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3890286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38902862014-01-21 What Magnitude Are Observed Non-Target Impacts from Weed Biocontrol? Suckling, David Maxwell Sforza, René François Henri PLoS One Research Article A systematic review focused by plant on non-target impacts from agents deliberately introduced for the biological control of weeds found significant non-target impacts to be rare. The magnitude of direct impact of 43 biocontrol agents on 140 non-target plants was retrospectively categorized using a risk management framework for ecological impacts of invasive species (minimal, minor, moderate, major, massive). The vast majority of agents introduced for classical biological control of weeds (>99% of 512 agents released) have had no known significant adverse effects on non-target plants thus far; major effects suppressing non-target plant populations could be expected to be detectable. Most direct non-target impacts on plants (91.6%) were categorized as minimal or minor in magnitude with no known adverse long-term impact on non-target plant populations, but a few cacti and thistles are affected at moderate (n = 3), major (n = 7) to massive (n = 1) scale. The largest direct impacts are from two agents (Cactoblastis cactorum on native cacti and Rhinocyllus conicus on native thistles), but these introductions would not be permitted today as more balanced attitudes exist to plant biodiversity, driven by both society and the scientific community. Our analysis shows (as far as is known), weed biological control agents have a biosafety track record of >99% of cases avoiding significant non-target impacts on plant populations. Some impacts could have been overlooked, but this seems unlikely to change the basic distribution of very limited adverse effects. Fewer non-target impacts can be expected in future because of improved science and incorporation of wider values. Failure to use biological control represents a significant opportunity cost from the certainty of ongoing adverse impacts from invasive weeds. It is recommended that a simple five-step scale be used to better communicate the risk of consequences from both action (classical biological control) and no action (ongoing impacts from invasive weeds). Public Library of Science 2014-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3890286/ /pubmed/24454755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084847 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suckling, David Maxwell
Sforza, René François Henri
What Magnitude Are Observed Non-Target Impacts from Weed Biocontrol?
title What Magnitude Are Observed Non-Target Impacts from Weed Biocontrol?
title_full What Magnitude Are Observed Non-Target Impacts from Weed Biocontrol?
title_fullStr What Magnitude Are Observed Non-Target Impacts from Weed Biocontrol?
title_full_unstemmed What Magnitude Are Observed Non-Target Impacts from Weed Biocontrol?
title_short What Magnitude Are Observed Non-Target Impacts from Weed Biocontrol?
title_sort what magnitude are observed non-target impacts from weed biocontrol?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24454755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084847
work_keys_str_mv AT sucklingdavidmaxwell whatmagnitudeareobservednontargetimpactsfromweedbiocontrol
AT sforzarenefrancoishenri whatmagnitudeareobservednontargetimpactsfromweedbiocontrol