Cargando…

How to interpret Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) profiles?

BACKGROUND: DNA methylation plays a key role in development, contributes to genome stability, and may also respond to external factors supporting adaptation and evolution. To connect different types of stimuli with particular biological processes, identifying genome regions with altered 5-methylcyto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fulneček, Jaroslav, Kovařík, Aleš
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24393618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-15-2
_version_ 1782299279801450496
author Fulneček, Jaroslav
Kovařík, Aleš
author_facet Fulneček, Jaroslav
Kovařík, Aleš
author_sort Fulneček, Jaroslav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: DNA methylation plays a key role in development, contributes to genome stability, and may also respond to external factors supporting adaptation and evolution. To connect different types of stimuli with particular biological processes, identifying genome regions with altered 5-methylcytosine distribution at a genome-wide scale is important. Many researchers are using the simple, reliable, and relatively inexpensive Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) method that is particularly useful in studies of epigenetic variation. However, electrophoretic patterns produced by the method are rather difficult to interpret, particularly when MspI and HpaII isoschizomers are used because these enzymes are methylation-sensitive, and any C within the CCGG recognition motif can be methylated in plant DNA. RESULTS: Here, we evaluate MSAP patterns with respect to current knowledge of the enzyme activities and the level and distribution of 5-methylcytosine in plant and vertebrate genomes. We discuss potential caveats related to complex MSAP patterns and provide clues regarding how to interpret them. We further show that addition of combined HpaII + MspI digestion would assist in the interpretation of the most controversial MSAP pattern represented by the signal in the HpaII but not in the MspI profile. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend modification of the MSAP protocol that definitely discerns between putative hemimethylated mCCGG and internal CmCGG sites. We believe that our view and the simple improvement will assist in correct MSAP data interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3890580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38905802014-01-15 How to interpret Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) profiles? Fulneček, Jaroslav Kovařík, Aleš BMC Genet Methodology Article BACKGROUND: DNA methylation plays a key role in development, contributes to genome stability, and may also respond to external factors supporting adaptation and evolution. To connect different types of stimuli with particular biological processes, identifying genome regions with altered 5-methylcytosine distribution at a genome-wide scale is important. Many researchers are using the simple, reliable, and relatively inexpensive Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) method that is particularly useful in studies of epigenetic variation. However, electrophoretic patterns produced by the method are rather difficult to interpret, particularly when MspI and HpaII isoschizomers are used because these enzymes are methylation-sensitive, and any C within the CCGG recognition motif can be methylated in plant DNA. RESULTS: Here, we evaluate MSAP patterns with respect to current knowledge of the enzyme activities and the level and distribution of 5-methylcytosine in plant and vertebrate genomes. We discuss potential caveats related to complex MSAP patterns and provide clues regarding how to interpret them. We further show that addition of combined HpaII + MspI digestion would assist in the interpretation of the most controversial MSAP pattern represented by the signal in the HpaII but not in the MspI profile. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend modification of the MSAP protocol that definitely discerns between putative hemimethylated mCCGG and internal CmCGG sites. We believe that our view and the simple improvement will assist in correct MSAP data interpretation. BioMed Central 2014-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3890580/ /pubmed/24393618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-15-2 Text en Copyright © 2014 Fulneček and Kovařík; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Fulneček, Jaroslav
Kovařík, Aleš
How to interpret Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) profiles?
title How to interpret Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) profiles?
title_full How to interpret Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) profiles?
title_fullStr How to interpret Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) profiles?
title_full_unstemmed How to interpret Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) profiles?
title_short How to interpret Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) profiles?
title_sort how to interpret methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism (msap) profiles?
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24393618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-15-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fulnecekjaroslav howtointerpretmethylationsensitiveamplifiedpolymorphismmsapprofiles
AT kovarikales howtointerpretmethylationsensitiveamplifiedpolymorphismmsapprofiles