Cargando…

Evaluation of the performance of existing non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms

BACKGROUND: The high burden and rising incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in resource constrained countries necessitates implementation of robust and pragmatic primary and secondary prevention strategies. Many current CVD management guidelines recommend absolute cardiovascular (CV) risk asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kariuki, Jacob K, Stuart-Shor, Eileen M, Leveille, Suzanne G, Hayman, Laura L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-13-123
_version_ 1782299280502947840
author Kariuki, Jacob K
Stuart-Shor, Eileen M
Leveille, Suzanne G
Hayman, Laura L
author_facet Kariuki, Jacob K
Stuart-Shor, Eileen M
Leveille, Suzanne G
Hayman, Laura L
author_sort Kariuki, Jacob K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The high burden and rising incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in resource constrained countries necessitates implementation of robust and pragmatic primary and secondary prevention strategies. Many current CVD management guidelines recommend absolute cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment as a clinically sound guide to preventive and treatment strategies. Development of non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms enable absolute risk assessment in resource constrained countries. The objective of this review is to evaluate the performance of existing non-laboratory based CV risk assessment algorithms using the benchmarks for clinically useful CV risk assessment algorithms outlined by Cooney and colleagues. METHODS: A literature search to identify non-laboratory based risk prediction algorithms was performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Ovid Premier Nursing Journals Plus, and PubMed databases. The identified algorithms were evaluated using the benchmarks for clinically useful cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms outlined by Cooney and colleagues. RESULTS: Five non-laboratory based CV risk assessment algorithms were identified. The Gaziano and Framingham algorithms met the criteria for appropriateness of statistical methods used to derive the algorithms and endpoints. The Swedish Consultation, Framingham and Gaziano algorithms demonstrated good discrimination in derivation datasets. Only the Gaziano algorithm was externally validated where it had optimal discrimination. The Gaziano and WHO algorithms had chart formats which made them simple and user friendly for clinical application. CONCLUSION: Both the Gaziano and Framingham non-laboratory based algorithms met most of the criteria outlined by Cooney and colleagues. External validation of the algorithms in diverse samples is needed to ascertain their performance and applicability to different populations and to enhance clinicians’ confidence in them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3890583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38905832014-01-15 Evaluation of the performance of existing non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms Kariuki, Jacob K Stuart-Shor, Eileen M Leveille, Suzanne G Hayman, Laura L BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The high burden and rising incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in resource constrained countries necessitates implementation of robust and pragmatic primary and secondary prevention strategies. Many current CVD management guidelines recommend absolute cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment as a clinically sound guide to preventive and treatment strategies. Development of non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms enable absolute risk assessment in resource constrained countries. The objective of this review is to evaluate the performance of existing non-laboratory based CV risk assessment algorithms using the benchmarks for clinically useful CV risk assessment algorithms outlined by Cooney and colleagues. METHODS: A literature search to identify non-laboratory based risk prediction algorithms was performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Ovid Premier Nursing Journals Plus, and PubMed databases. The identified algorithms were evaluated using the benchmarks for clinically useful cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms outlined by Cooney and colleagues. RESULTS: Five non-laboratory based CV risk assessment algorithms were identified. The Gaziano and Framingham algorithms met the criteria for appropriateness of statistical methods used to derive the algorithms and endpoints. The Swedish Consultation, Framingham and Gaziano algorithms demonstrated good discrimination in derivation datasets. Only the Gaziano algorithm was externally validated where it had optimal discrimination. The Gaziano and WHO algorithms had chart formats which made them simple and user friendly for clinical application. CONCLUSION: Both the Gaziano and Framingham non-laboratory based algorithms met most of the criteria outlined by Cooney and colleagues. External validation of the algorithms in diverse samples is needed to ascertain their performance and applicability to different populations and to enhance clinicians’ confidence in them. BioMed Central 2013-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3890583/ /pubmed/24373202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-13-123 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kariuki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kariuki, Jacob K
Stuart-Shor, Eileen M
Leveille, Suzanne G
Hayman, Laura L
Evaluation of the performance of existing non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms
title Evaluation of the performance of existing non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms
title_full Evaluation of the performance of existing non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms
title_fullStr Evaluation of the performance of existing non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the performance of existing non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms
title_short Evaluation of the performance of existing non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms
title_sort evaluation of the performance of existing non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-13-123
work_keys_str_mv AT kariukijacobk evaluationoftheperformanceofexistingnonlaboratorybasedcardiovascularriskassessmentalgorithms
AT stuartshoreileenm evaluationoftheperformanceofexistingnonlaboratorybasedcardiovascularriskassessmentalgorithms
AT leveillesuzanneg evaluationoftheperformanceofexistingnonlaboratorybasedcardiovascularriskassessmentalgorithms
AT haymanlaural evaluationoftheperformanceofexistingnonlaboratorybasedcardiovascularriskassessmentalgorithms