Cargando…

Digital image analysis of endoscopic ultrasonography is helpful in diagnosing gastric mesenchymal tumors

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a valuable imaging tool for evaluating subepithelial lesions in the stomach. However, there are few studies on differentiation between gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and benign mesenchymal tumors, such as leiomyoma or schwannoma, with the use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Gwang Ha, Kim, Kwang Baek, Lee, Seung Hyun, Jeon, Hye Kyung, Park, Do Youn, Jeon, Tae Yong, Kim, Dae Hwan, Song, Geun Am
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24400772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-14-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a valuable imaging tool for evaluating subepithelial lesions in the stomach. However, there are few studies on differentiation between gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and benign mesenchymal tumors, such as leiomyoma or schwannoma, with the use of EUS. In addition, there are limitations in the analysis of the characteristic features of such tumors due to poor interobserver agreement as a result of subjective interpretation of EUS images. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the role of digital image analysis in distinguishing the features of GISTs from those of benign mesenchymal tumors on EUS. METHODS: We enrolled 65 patients with histopathologically proven gastric GIST, leiomyoma or schwannoma on surgically resected specimens who underwent EUS examination at our endoscopic unit from January 2007 to September 2010. After standardization of the EUS images, brightness values including the mean (T(mean)), indicative of echogenicity, and the standard deviation (T(SD)), indicative of heterogeneity, in the tumors were analyzed. RESULTS: The T(mean) and T(SD) were significantly higher in GIST than in leiomyoma and schwannoma (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the T(mean) or T(SD) between benign and malignant GISTs. The sensitivity and specificity were almost optimized for differentiating GIST from leiomyoma or schwannoma when the critical values of T(mean) and T(SD) were 65 and 75, respectively. The presence of at least 1 of these 2 findings in a given tumor resulted in a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 94%, negative predictive value of 80%, and accuracy of 90.8% for predicting GIST. CONCLUSIONS: Digital image analysis provides objective information on EUS images; thus, it can be useful in diagnosing gastric mesenchymal tumors.