Cargando…
Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway S.A.L.T to aid blind orotracheal intubation: A pilot study
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (S.A.L.T) is a new airway gadget conceived as an effective device to facilitate blind oro-tracheal intubation. Literature review showed no available clinical study on human subjects. The aim of our study was to evaluate S.A.L.T as...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3891189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459620 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.124112 |
_version_ | 1782299351207378944 |
---|---|
author | Anand, Vijay G Girinivasan, Leelakrishna, Thavamani, |
author_facet | Anand, Vijay G Girinivasan, Leelakrishna, Thavamani, |
author_sort | Anand, Vijay G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (S.A.L.T) is a new airway gadget conceived as an effective device to facilitate blind oro-tracheal intubation. Literature review showed no available clinical study on human subjects. The aim of our study was to evaluate S.A.L.T as an adjunct to blind oro-tracheal intubation. METHODS: Study design: Single centre, Single group, Open label, Prospective, Interventional pilot study. Study Group: 30 adult patients of either sex belonging to ASA I and II, scheduled for elective surgery under General anaesthesia. Patients were pre-medicated with inj. Glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg and inj. Midazolam 2 mg and induced with Inj. Propofol 2 mg/kg IV. After inj. Suxamethonium 1.5 mg/kg IV, S.A.L.T was inserted and a size 7.0 ID cuffed ETT was inserted through it immediately. The time period, from insertion of the S.A.L.T to the insertion of the ETT was noted. A successful intubation was defined as to insert SALT and intubate through it within 2 minutes irrespective of the number of attempts. Airway trauma, if any was recorded. RESULTS: Only 40% of the patients were successfully intubated [(20.4% to 59.6% with 95% confidence interval (CI)]. The mean number of attempts required for intubation was 1.4 ± 0.67 (CI - 0.99 to 1.8) and the mean time for intubation was 26.3 ± 19.0 seconds (CI - 14.3 to 38.4 sec). Mallampati class I had more success rate than class III (P < 0.05). No airway trauma was recorded. CONCLUSION: S.A.L.T shows limited usefulness as an adjunct for aided blind oro-tracheal intubation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3891189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38911892014-01-23 Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway S.A.L.T to aid blind orotracheal intubation: A pilot study Anand, Vijay G Girinivasan, Leelakrishna, Thavamani, Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (S.A.L.T) is a new airway gadget conceived as an effective device to facilitate blind oro-tracheal intubation. Literature review showed no available clinical study on human subjects. The aim of our study was to evaluate S.A.L.T as an adjunct to blind oro-tracheal intubation. METHODS: Study design: Single centre, Single group, Open label, Prospective, Interventional pilot study. Study Group: 30 adult patients of either sex belonging to ASA I and II, scheduled for elective surgery under General anaesthesia. Patients were pre-medicated with inj. Glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg and inj. Midazolam 2 mg and induced with Inj. Propofol 2 mg/kg IV. After inj. Suxamethonium 1.5 mg/kg IV, S.A.L.T was inserted and a size 7.0 ID cuffed ETT was inserted through it immediately. The time period, from insertion of the S.A.L.T to the insertion of the ETT was noted. A successful intubation was defined as to insert SALT and intubate through it within 2 minutes irrespective of the number of attempts. Airway trauma, if any was recorded. RESULTS: Only 40% of the patients were successfully intubated [(20.4% to 59.6% with 95% confidence interval (CI)]. The mean number of attempts required for intubation was 1.4 ± 0.67 (CI - 0.99 to 1.8) and the mean time for intubation was 26.3 ± 19.0 seconds (CI - 14.3 to 38.4 sec). Mallampati class I had more success rate than class III (P < 0.05). No airway trauma was recorded. CONCLUSION: S.A.L.T shows limited usefulness as an adjunct for aided blind oro-tracheal intubation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3891189/ /pubmed/24459620 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.124112 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Anand, Vijay G Girinivasan, Leelakrishna, Thavamani, Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway S.A.L.T to aid blind orotracheal intubation: A pilot study |
title | Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway S.A.L.T to aid blind orotracheal intubation: A pilot study |
title_full | Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway S.A.L.T to aid blind orotracheal intubation: A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway S.A.L.T to aid blind orotracheal intubation: A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway S.A.L.T to aid blind orotracheal intubation: A pilot study |
title_short | Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway S.A.L.T to aid blind orotracheal intubation: A pilot study |
title_sort | evaluation of the new supraglottic airway s.a.l.t to aid blind orotracheal intubation: a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3891189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459620 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.124112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anandvijayg evaluationofthenewsupraglotticairwaysalttoaidblindorotrachealintubationapilotstudy AT girinivasan evaluationofthenewsupraglotticairwaysalttoaidblindorotrachealintubationapilotstudy AT leelakrishna evaluationofthenewsupraglotticairwaysalttoaidblindorotrachealintubationapilotstudy AT thavamani evaluationofthenewsupraglotticairwaysalttoaidblindorotrachealintubationapilotstudy |