Cargando…

Injury to the diaphragm: Our experience in Union Head quarters Hospital

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic injury is a global diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. OBJECTIVES: The study was to identify the variations in the risk factors, diagnosis, management, and outcome between blunt and penetrating injuries of the diaphragm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was cond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radjou, Angeline Neetha, Balliga, Dillip Kumar, Uthrapathy, Muthandavan, Pal, Ranabir, Mahajan, Preetam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3891192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459623
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.124139
_version_ 1782299351912022016
author Radjou, Angeline Neetha
Balliga, Dillip Kumar
Uthrapathy, Muthandavan
Pal, Ranabir
Mahajan, Preetam
author_facet Radjou, Angeline Neetha
Balliga, Dillip Kumar
Uthrapathy, Muthandavan
Pal, Ranabir
Mahajan, Preetam
author_sort Radjou, Angeline Neetha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic injury is a global diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. OBJECTIVES: The study was to identify the variations in the risk factors, diagnosis, management, and outcome between blunt and penetrating injuries of the diaphragm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on patients who were diagnosed with injury to diaphragm during preoperative, intraoperative, or postmortem period. The risk correlates and the trail of events following injury, interventions, and outcomes were studied. RESULTS: Of the 25 cases, blunt injury was experienced by 10. Road traffic injury was the most common cause in blunt trauma and assault with knife in penetrating trauma. Acute presentation was the most common mechanism. X-rays were positive in 52% cases. The most common reason for false negative X-rays was massive effusion/hemothorax. Computed tomography (CT) improved the positivity rate to 62.5%. A total of 25% of diaphragmatic injuries were diagnosed during surgery for hemodynamic instability irrespective of initial X-rays findings. Laprotomy alone was sufficient in majority of cases. The defects were largely in the left side; mean defect size was more in blunt trauma. Associated injuries were noted in 92%. Stomach was most affected in penetrating injuries and spleen in blunt trauma. Empeyma was the most common morbidity. Mortality rate of 13% in penetrating injury was far lower than 60% in blunt injury. Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was significantly related to the fatal outcomes irrespective of mechanism. Diagnostic laparoscopy for asymptomatic low velocity junctional penetrating wounds revealed diaphragmatic injury in 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of multisystem injuries at our trauma center is on the rise. A high index of suspicion is needed for diagnosis of diaphragmatic injury. The need for thorough exploratory laprotomy is essential. In resource stretched setting like ours, the need for routine diagnostic laparoscopy in asymptomatic junctional wounds has to be validated further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3891192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38911922014-01-23 Injury to the diaphragm: Our experience in Union Head quarters Hospital Radjou, Angeline Neetha Balliga, Dillip Kumar Uthrapathy, Muthandavan Pal, Ranabir Mahajan, Preetam Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic injury is a global diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. OBJECTIVES: The study was to identify the variations in the risk factors, diagnosis, management, and outcome between blunt and penetrating injuries of the diaphragm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on patients who were diagnosed with injury to diaphragm during preoperative, intraoperative, or postmortem period. The risk correlates and the trail of events following injury, interventions, and outcomes were studied. RESULTS: Of the 25 cases, blunt injury was experienced by 10. Road traffic injury was the most common cause in blunt trauma and assault with knife in penetrating trauma. Acute presentation was the most common mechanism. X-rays were positive in 52% cases. The most common reason for false negative X-rays was massive effusion/hemothorax. Computed tomography (CT) improved the positivity rate to 62.5%. A total of 25% of diaphragmatic injuries were diagnosed during surgery for hemodynamic instability irrespective of initial X-rays findings. Laprotomy alone was sufficient in majority of cases. The defects were largely in the left side; mean defect size was more in blunt trauma. Associated injuries were noted in 92%. Stomach was most affected in penetrating injuries and spleen in blunt trauma. Empeyma was the most common morbidity. Mortality rate of 13% in penetrating injury was far lower than 60% in blunt injury. Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was significantly related to the fatal outcomes irrespective of mechanism. Diagnostic laparoscopy for asymptomatic low velocity junctional penetrating wounds revealed diaphragmatic injury in 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of multisystem injuries at our trauma center is on the rise. A high index of suspicion is needed for diagnosis of diaphragmatic injury. The need for thorough exploratory laprotomy is essential. In resource stretched setting like ours, the need for routine diagnostic laparoscopy in asymptomatic junctional wounds has to be validated further. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3891192/ /pubmed/24459623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.124139 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Radjou, Angeline Neetha
Balliga, Dillip Kumar
Uthrapathy, Muthandavan
Pal, Ranabir
Mahajan, Preetam
Injury to the diaphragm: Our experience in Union Head quarters Hospital
title Injury to the diaphragm: Our experience in Union Head quarters Hospital
title_full Injury to the diaphragm: Our experience in Union Head quarters Hospital
title_fullStr Injury to the diaphragm: Our experience in Union Head quarters Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Injury to the diaphragm: Our experience in Union Head quarters Hospital
title_short Injury to the diaphragm: Our experience in Union Head quarters Hospital
title_sort injury to the diaphragm: our experience in union head quarters hospital
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3891192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459623
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.124139
work_keys_str_mv AT radjouangelineneetha injurytothediaphragmourexperienceinunionheadquartershospital
AT balligadillipkumar injurytothediaphragmourexperienceinunionheadquartershospital
AT uthrapathymuthandavan injurytothediaphragmourexperienceinunionheadquartershospital
AT palranabir injurytothediaphragmourexperienceinunionheadquartershospital
AT mahajanpreetam injurytothediaphragmourexperienceinunionheadquartershospital