Cargando…
Evaluation of tracheal cuff pressure variation in spontaneously breathing patients
BACKGROUND: Most of the studies referring cuff tubes’ issues were conducted on intubated patients. Not much is known about the cuff pressure performance in chronically tracheostomized patients disconnected from mechanical ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cuff pressure (CP) variation in tracheosto...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3891193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459624 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.124148 |
_version_ | 1782299352152145920 |
---|---|
author | Plotnikow, Gustavo A Roux, Nicolas Feld, Viviana Gogniat, Emiliano Villalba, Dario Ribero, Noelia Vairo Sartore, Marisa Bosso, Mauro Quiroga, Corina Leiva, Valeria Scrigna, Mariana Puchulu, Facundo Distéfano, Eduardo Scapellato, Jose Luis Intile, Dante Planells, Fernando Noval, Diego Buñirigo, Pablo Jofré, Ricardo Nielsen, Ernesto Díaz |
author_facet | Plotnikow, Gustavo A Roux, Nicolas Feld, Viviana Gogniat, Emiliano Villalba, Dario Ribero, Noelia Vairo Sartore, Marisa Bosso, Mauro Quiroga, Corina Leiva, Valeria Scrigna, Mariana Puchulu, Facundo Distéfano, Eduardo Scapellato, Jose Luis Intile, Dante Planells, Fernando Noval, Diego Buñirigo, Pablo Jofré, Ricardo Nielsen, Ernesto Díaz |
author_sort | Plotnikow, Gustavo A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most of the studies referring cuff tubes’ issues were conducted on intubated patients. Not much is known about the cuff pressure performance in chronically tracheostomized patients disconnected from mechanical ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cuff pressure (CP) variation in tracheostomized, spontaneously breathing patients in a weaning rehabilitation center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental setup to test instruments in vitro, in which the gauge (TRACOE) performance at different pressure levels was evaluated in six tracheostomy tubes, and a clinical setupin which CP variation over 24 h, every 4 h, and for 6 days was measured in 35 chronically tracheostomized clinically stable, patients who had been disconnected from mechanical ventilation for at least 72 h. The following data were recorded: Tube brand, type, and size; date of the tube placed; the patient's body position; the position of the head; axillary temperature; pulse and respiration rates; blood pressure; and pulse oximetry. RESULTS: In vitro difference between the initial pressure (IP) and measured pressure (MP) was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The difference between the IP and MP was significant when selecting for various tube brands (P < 0.05). In the clinical set-up, 207 measurements were performed and the CP was >30 cm H(2)O in 6.28% of the recordings, 20-30 cm H(2)O in 42.0% of the recordings, and <20 cm H(2)O in 51.69% of the recordings. CONCLUSION: The systematic CP measurement in chronically tracheostomized, spontaneously breathing patients showed high variability, which was independent of tube brand, size, type, or time of placement. Consequently, measurements should be made more frequently. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3891193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38911932014-01-23 Evaluation of tracheal cuff pressure variation in spontaneously breathing patients Plotnikow, Gustavo A Roux, Nicolas Feld, Viviana Gogniat, Emiliano Villalba, Dario Ribero, Noelia Vairo Sartore, Marisa Bosso, Mauro Quiroga, Corina Leiva, Valeria Scrigna, Mariana Puchulu, Facundo Distéfano, Eduardo Scapellato, Jose Luis Intile, Dante Planells, Fernando Noval, Diego Buñirigo, Pablo Jofré, Ricardo Nielsen, Ernesto Díaz Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Most of the studies referring cuff tubes’ issues were conducted on intubated patients. Not much is known about the cuff pressure performance in chronically tracheostomized patients disconnected from mechanical ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cuff pressure (CP) variation in tracheostomized, spontaneously breathing patients in a weaning rehabilitation center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental setup to test instruments in vitro, in which the gauge (TRACOE) performance at different pressure levels was evaluated in six tracheostomy tubes, and a clinical setupin which CP variation over 24 h, every 4 h, and for 6 days was measured in 35 chronically tracheostomized clinically stable, patients who had been disconnected from mechanical ventilation for at least 72 h. The following data were recorded: Tube brand, type, and size; date of the tube placed; the patient's body position; the position of the head; axillary temperature; pulse and respiration rates; blood pressure; and pulse oximetry. RESULTS: In vitro difference between the initial pressure (IP) and measured pressure (MP) was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The difference between the IP and MP was significant when selecting for various tube brands (P < 0.05). In the clinical set-up, 207 measurements were performed and the CP was >30 cm H(2)O in 6.28% of the recordings, 20-30 cm H(2)O in 42.0% of the recordings, and <20 cm H(2)O in 51.69% of the recordings. CONCLUSION: The systematic CP measurement in chronically tracheostomized, spontaneously breathing patients showed high variability, which was independent of tube brand, size, type, or time of placement. Consequently, measurements should be made more frequently. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3891193/ /pubmed/24459624 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.124148 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Plotnikow, Gustavo A Roux, Nicolas Feld, Viviana Gogniat, Emiliano Villalba, Dario Ribero, Noelia Vairo Sartore, Marisa Bosso, Mauro Quiroga, Corina Leiva, Valeria Scrigna, Mariana Puchulu, Facundo Distéfano, Eduardo Scapellato, Jose Luis Intile, Dante Planells, Fernando Noval, Diego Buñirigo, Pablo Jofré, Ricardo Nielsen, Ernesto Díaz Evaluation of tracheal cuff pressure variation in spontaneously breathing patients |
title | Evaluation of tracheal cuff pressure variation in spontaneously breathing patients |
title_full | Evaluation of tracheal cuff pressure variation in spontaneously breathing patients |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of tracheal cuff pressure variation in spontaneously breathing patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of tracheal cuff pressure variation in spontaneously breathing patients |
title_short | Evaluation of tracheal cuff pressure variation in spontaneously breathing patients |
title_sort | evaluation of tracheal cuff pressure variation in spontaneously breathing patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3891193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459624 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.124148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plotnikowgustavoa evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT rouxnicolas evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT feldviviana evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT gogniatemiliano evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT villalbadario evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT riberonoeliavairo evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT sartoremarisa evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT bossomauro evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT quirogacorina evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT leivavaleria evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT scrignamariana evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT puchulufacundo evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT distefanoeduardo evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT scapellatojoseluis evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT intiledante evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT planellsfernando evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT novaldiego evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT bunirigopablo evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT jofrericardo evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT nielsenernestodiaz evaluationoftrachealcuffpressurevariationinspontaneouslybreathingpatients |