Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study

PURPOSE: In this study, the effect of calcium sodium phosphosilicate (NovaMin) desensitizing agent, which is a powder-based system, and hydroxyethyl methacrylate and glutaraldehyde (Gluma desensitizer), which is liquid-based system, on dentinal tubule occlusion was analyzed by scanning electron micr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, Surabhi, Gowda, Ashwini Shivananje, Joshi, Chintan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3891858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455439
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2013.43.6.269
_version_ 1782299429165858816
author Joshi, Surabhi
Gowda, Ashwini Shivananje
Joshi, Chintan
author_facet Joshi, Surabhi
Gowda, Ashwini Shivananje
Joshi, Chintan
author_sort Joshi, Surabhi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In this study, the effect of calcium sodium phosphosilicate (NovaMin) desensitizing agent, which is a powder-based system, and hydroxyethyl methacrylate and glutaraldehyde (Gluma desensitizer), which is liquid-based system, on dentinal tubule occlusion was analyzed by scanning electron microscope. The effects of the above two along with one control group were compared to determine the more effective method of sealing the dentinal tubules after initial application. METHODS: Twenty specimens were allocated to each of 3 groups: Control, Gluma desensitizer, and NovaMin. Two additional samples were also prepared and treated with Gluma and NovaMin; these samples were longitudinally fractured. The specimens were prepared from extracted sound human premolars and were stored in 10% formalin at room temperature. The teeth were cleaned of gross debris and then sectioned to provide one to two dentin specimens. The dentin specimens were etched with 6% citric acid for 2 minutes and rinsed in distilled water. Control discs were dried, and the test discs were treated with the desensitizing agents as per the manufacturer's instructions. The discs as well as longitudinal sections were later analyzed under the scanning electron microscope. The proportions of completely occluded, partially occluded, and open tubules within each group were calculated. The ratios of completely and partially occluded tubules to the total tubules for all the groups was determined, and the data was statistically analyzed using nonparametric tests and statistical significance was calculated. RESULTS: NovaMin showed more completely occluded tubules (0.545±0.051) while Gluma desensitizer showed more partially occluded tubules (0.532±0.075). The differences among all the groups were statistically significant (P≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both materials were effective in occluding dentinal tubules but NovaMin appeared more promising in occluding tubules completely after initial application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3891858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38918582014-01-16 Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study Joshi, Surabhi Gowda, Ashwini Shivananje Joshi, Chintan J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: In this study, the effect of calcium sodium phosphosilicate (NovaMin) desensitizing agent, which is a powder-based system, and hydroxyethyl methacrylate and glutaraldehyde (Gluma desensitizer), which is liquid-based system, on dentinal tubule occlusion was analyzed by scanning electron microscope. The effects of the above two along with one control group were compared to determine the more effective method of sealing the dentinal tubules after initial application. METHODS: Twenty specimens were allocated to each of 3 groups: Control, Gluma desensitizer, and NovaMin. Two additional samples were also prepared and treated with Gluma and NovaMin; these samples were longitudinally fractured. The specimens were prepared from extracted sound human premolars and were stored in 10% formalin at room temperature. The teeth were cleaned of gross debris and then sectioned to provide one to two dentin specimens. The dentin specimens were etched with 6% citric acid for 2 minutes and rinsed in distilled water. Control discs were dried, and the test discs were treated with the desensitizing agents as per the manufacturer's instructions. The discs as well as longitudinal sections were later analyzed under the scanning electron microscope. The proportions of completely occluded, partially occluded, and open tubules within each group were calculated. The ratios of completely and partially occluded tubules to the total tubules for all the groups was determined, and the data was statistically analyzed using nonparametric tests and statistical significance was calculated. RESULTS: NovaMin showed more completely occluded tubules (0.545±0.051) while Gluma desensitizer showed more partially occluded tubules (0.532±0.075). The differences among all the groups were statistically significant (P≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both materials were effective in occluding dentinal tubules but NovaMin appeared more promising in occluding tubules completely after initial application. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2013-12 2013-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3891858/ /pubmed/24455439 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2013.43.6.269 Text en Copyright © 2013 Korean Academy of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Joshi, Surabhi
Gowda, Ashwini Shivananje
Joshi, Chintan
Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study
title Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study
title_full Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study
title_short Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study
title_sort comparative evaluation of novamin desensitizer and gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3891858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455439
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2013.43.6.269
work_keys_str_mv AT joshisurabhi comparativeevaluationofnovamindesensitizerandglumadesensitizerondentinaltubuleocclusionascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT gowdaashwinishivananje comparativeevaluationofnovamindesensitizerandglumadesensitizerondentinaltubuleocclusionascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT joshichintan comparativeevaluationofnovamindesensitizerandglumadesensitizerondentinaltubuleocclusionascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy