Cargando…

Variations in contact patterns and dispatch guideline adherence between Norwegian emergency medical communication centres - a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The 19 Norwegian Emergency medical communication centres (EMCCs) use Norwegian Index for medical emergency assistance (Index) as dispatch guidelines. Little is known about the use of Index, nor its validity. We aimed to document the epidemiology of contacts made to the public emergency m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellensen, Eirin N, Hunskaar, Steinar, Wisborg, Torben, Zakariassen, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24398290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-22-2
_version_ 1782299444223410176
author Ellensen, Eirin N
Hunskaar, Steinar
Wisborg, Torben
Zakariassen, Erik
author_facet Ellensen, Eirin N
Hunskaar, Steinar
Wisborg, Torben
Zakariassen, Erik
author_sort Ellensen, Eirin N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 19 Norwegian Emergency medical communication centres (EMCCs) use Norwegian Index for medical emergency assistance (Index) as dispatch guidelines. Little is known about the use of Index, nor its validity. We aimed to document the epidemiology of contacts made to the public emergency medical phone number and the operators’ self-reported use of Index as a first step towards a validation study. METHODS: We registered all medical emergency calls to the EMCCs during a 72 h period in a national cross sectional study. We subsequently sent a questionnaire to all EMCC operators in Norway, asking how they use Index. A combined outcome variable “use of Index” was computed through a Likert scale, range 1–5. Regression models were used to examine factors influencing use. RESULTS: 2 298 contacts were included. National contact rate was 56/1 000 inhabitants per year, range between EMCCs 34 – 119. Acute contact (life-threatening situations) rate was 21/1 000 per year, range between EMCCs 5 – 31. Index criteria 6 – ’Unresolved problem’ accounts for 20% of the 113 contacts, range between EMCCs 10 – 42%. The mean use of Index was 3.95 (SD 0.39), corresponding to “more than 75% of emergency calls”. There were differences in use of Index on EMCC level, range 3.7 – 4.4, and a multi regression model explained 23.4% of the variation in use. Operators working rotation with ground ambulance services reported reduced use of Index compared to operators not working in rotation, while distinct EMCC focus on Index increased use of Index compared to EMCCs with no focus on Index. Use of electronic records and operators experience were the main reasons given for not using Index. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large variation between the EMCCs with regard to both contact patterns and use of Index. There is a relatively high overall self-reported use of Index by the operators, with variations on both individual and EMCC level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3892008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38920082014-01-15 Variations in contact patterns and dispatch guideline adherence between Norwegian emergency medical communication centres - a cross-sectional study Ellensen, Eirin N Hunskaar, Steinar Wisborg, Torben Zakariassen, Erik Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The 19 Norwegian Emergency medical communication centres (EMCCs) use Norwegian Index for medical emergency assistance (Index) as dispatch guidelines. Little is known about the use of Index, nor its validity. We aimed to document the epidemiology of contacts made to the public emergency medical phone number and the operators’ self-reported use of Index as a first step towards a validation study. METHODS: We registered all medical emergency calls to the EMCCs during a 72 h period in a national cross sectional study. We subsequently sent a questionnaire to all EMCC operators in Norway, asking how they use Index. A combined outcome variable “use of Index” was computed through a Likert scale, range 1–5. Regression models were used to examine factors influencing use. RESULTS: 2 298 contacts were included. National contact rate was 56/1 000 inhabitants per year, range between EMCCs 34 – 119. Acute contact (life-threatening situations) rate was 21/1 000 per year, range between EMCCs 5 – 31. Index criteria 6 – ’Unresolved problem’ accounts for 20% of the 113 contacts, range between EMCCs 10 – 42%. The mean use of Index was 3.95 (SD 0.39), corresponding to “more than 75% of emergency calls”. There were differences in use of Index on EMCC level, range 3.7 – 4.4, and a multi regression model explained 23.4% of the variation in use. Operators working rotation with ground ambulance services reported reduced use of Index compared to operators not working in rotation, while distinct EMCC focus on Index increased use of Index compared to EMCCs with no focus on Index. Use of electronic records and operators experience were the main reasons given for not using Index. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large variation between the EMCCs with regard to both contact patterns and use of Index. There is a relatively high overall self-reported use of Index by the operators, with variations on both individual and EMCC level. BioMed Central 2014-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3892008/ /pubmed/24398290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-22-2 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ellensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ellensen, Eirin N
Hunskaar, Steinar
Wisborg, Torben
Zakariassen, Erik
Variations in contact patterns and dispatch guideline adherence between Norwegian emergency medical communication centres - a cross-sectional study
title Variations in contact patterns and dispatch guideline adherence between Norwegian emergency medical communication centres - a cross-sectional study
title_full Variations in contact patterns and dispatch guideline adherence between Norwegian emergency medical communication centres - a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Variations in contact patterns and dispatch guideline adherence between Norwegian emergency medical communication centres - a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Variations in contact patterns and dispatch guideline adherence between Norwegian emergency medical communication centres - a cross-sectional study
title_short Variations in contact patterns and dispatch guideline adherence between Norwegian emergency medical communication centres - a cross-sectional study
title_sort variations in contact patterns and dispatch guideline adherence between norwegian emergency medical communication centres - a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24398290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-22-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ellenseneirinn variationsincontactpatternsanddispatchguidelineadherencebetweennorwegianemergencymedicalcommunicationcentresacrosssectionalstudy
AT hunskaarsteinar variationsincontactpatternsanddispatchguidelineadherencebetweennorwegianemergencymedicalcommunicationcentresacrosssectionalstudy
AT wisborgtorben variationsincontactpatternsanddispatchguidelineadherencebetweennorwegianemergencymedicalcommunicationcentresacrosssectionalstudy
AT zakariassenerik variationsincontactpatternsanddispatchguidelineadherencebetweennorwegianemergencymedicalcommunicationcentresacrosssectionalstudy