Cargando…

Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study

Objective:To determine the effect of different retraction cord medicaments on surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials and compare this effect on any two brands of commercially available polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Material and methods: Four stainless steel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Rina, Singh, Jagjit, Gambhir, Ramandeep S., Singh, Ramanpreet, Nanda, Sonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455069
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51134
_version_ 1782299494825590784
author Singh, Rina
Singh, Jagjit
Gambhir, Ramandeep S.
Singh, Ramanpreet
Nanda, Sonia
author_facet Singh, Rina
Singh, Jagjit
Gambhir, Ramandeep S.
Singh, Ramanpreet
Nanda, Sonia
author_sort Singh, Rina
collection PubMed
description Objective:To determine the effect of different retraction cord medicaments on surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials and compare this effect on any two brands of commercially available polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Material and methods: Four stainless steel dies were made according to ADA specification no.19. Three dies were treated with aluminium chloride (5%), ferric sulphate (13.3%) and epinephrine (0.1%) while the fourth one was left untreated to serve as control. Two impression materials (Dentsply and 3M ESPE) were used. Results: All the three medicaments adversely affected the surface detail reproduction of both the brands of the polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. These effects were statistically significant as compared to untreated control. The impressions of 3M ESPE brand have shown better surface detail reproduction as compared to Dentsply impression material. Conclusion: Surface detail reproduction of the polyvinyl siloxane impression materials is adversely affected by the retraction cord medicaments. The presence of moisture or any traces of the medicaments should be removed from the tooth surface to provide a dry field for the correct reproduction of the surface detail of these materials. Key words:Polyvinyl Siloxane, retraction cord medicaments, surface detail reproduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3892249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38922492014-01-22 Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study Singh, Rina Singh, Jagjit Gambhir, Ramandeep S. Singh, Ramanpreet Nanda, Sonia J Clin Exp Dent Research Objective:To determine the effect of different retraction cord medicaments on surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials and compare this effect on any two brands of commercially available polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Material and methods: Four stainless steel dies were made according to ADA specification no.19. Three dies were treated with aluminium chloride (5%), ferric sulphate (13.3%) and epinephrine (0.1%) while the fourth one was left untreated to serve as control. Two impression materials (Dentsply and 3M ESPE) were used. Results: All the three medicaments adversely affected the surface detail reproduction of both the brands of the polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. These effects were statistically significant as compared to untreated control. The impressions of 3M ESPE brand have shown better surface detail reproduction as compared to Dentsply impression material. Conclusion: Surface detail reproduction of the polyvinyl siloxane impression materials is adversely affected by the retraction cord medicaments. The presence of moisture or any traces of the medicaments should be removed from the tooth surface to provide a dry field for the correct reproduction of the surface detail of these materials. Key words:Polyvinyl Siloxane, retraction cord medicaments, surface detail reproduction. Medicina Oral S.L. 2013-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3892249/ /pubmed/24455069 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51134 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Singh, Rina
Singh, Jagjit
Gambhir, Ramandeep S.
Singh, Ramanpreet
Nanda, Sonia
Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study
title Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study
title_full Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study
title_short Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study
title_sort comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available polyvinyl siloxane impression materials - an invitro study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455069
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51134
work_keys_str_mv AT singhrina comparisonoftheeffectofdifferentmedicamentsonsurfacereproductionoftwocommerciallyavailablepolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT singhjagjit comparisonoftheeffectofdifferentmedicamentsonsurfacereproductionoftwocommerciallyavailablepolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT gambhirramandeeps comparisonoftheeffectofdifferentmedicamentsonsurfacereproductionoftwocommerciallyavailablepolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT singhramanpreet comparisonoftheeffectofdifferentmedicamentsonsurfacereproductionoftwocommerciallyavailablepolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT nandasonia comparisonoftheeffectofdifferentmedicamentsonsurfacereproductionoftwocommerciallyavailablepolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterialsaninvitrostudy