Cargando…
Comparing the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model
Objective: To evaluate the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model. Study Design: Twenty-one human molars were divided into 3 groups. Cavities were then cut into the teeth (4 per tooth, 28 cavities per group). After sterilization, the teeth were lef...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455068 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51130 |
_version_ | 1782299495273332736 |
---|---|
author | Kapdan, Arife Öztaş, Nurhan Sümer, Zeynep |
author_facet | Kapdan, Arife Öztaş, Nurhan Sümer, Zeynep |
author_sort | Kapdan, Arife |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To evaluate the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model. Study Design: Twenty-one human molars were divided into 3 groups. Cavities were then cut into the teeth (4 per tooth, 28 cavities per group). After sterilization, the teeth were left in broth cultures of 106 colony-forming units (CFU) ml-1 of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) at 36°C for 48 h. The appropriate treatment followed (group A, control; group B, 2% chlorhexidine solution; and group C, 80s of treatment with ozone, and the cavities were then filled with composite resin. After 72h, the restorations were removed, dentin chips were collected with an excavator, and the total number of microorganisms was determined. Results: Both of the treatments significantly reduced the number of S. mutans present compared with the control group and there was a significant difference between the all groups in terms of the amount of the microorganisms grown (p < 0.05). Group B was beter than group C; and group C was better than group A. Moreover, it was found that the amount of the growth in the group of chlorhexidine was significantly less than that of the ozone group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Chlorhexidine solution was the antibacterial treatment most efficacious on S. mutans; however, ozone application could be an anlternative cavity disinfection method because of ozone’s cavity disinfection activity. Key words:Antibacterial activity, chlorhexidine, ozone, streptococcus mutans, tooth cavity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3892251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38922512014-01-22 Comparing the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model Kapdan, Arife Öztaş, Nurhan Sümer, Zeynep J Clin Exp Dent Research Objective: To evaluate the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model. Study Design: Twenty-one human molars were divided into 3 groups. Cavities were then cut into the teeth (4 per tooth, 28 cavities per group). After sterilization, the teeth were left in broth cultures of 106 colony-forming units (CFU) ml-1 of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) at 36°C for 48 h. The appropriate treatment followed (group A, control; group B, 2% chlorhexidine solution; and group C, 80s of treatment with ozone, and the cavities were then filled with composite resin. After 72h, the restorations were removed, dentin chips were collected with an excavator, and the total number of microorganisms was determined. Results: Both of the treatments significantly reduced the number of S. mutans present compared with the control group and there was a significant difference between the all groups in terms of the amount of the microorganisms grown (p < 0.05). Group B was beter than group C; and group C was better than group A. Moreover, it was found that the amount of the growth in the group of chlorhexidine was significantly less than that of the ozone group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Chlorhexidine solution was the antibacterial treatment most efficacious on S. mutans; however, ozone application could be an anlternative cavity disinfection method because of ozone’s cavity disinfection activity. Key words:Antibacterial activity, chlorhexidine, ozone, streptococcus mutans, tooth cavity. Medicina Oral S.L. 2013-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3892251/ /pubmed/24455068 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51130 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Kapdan, Arife Öztaş, Nurhan Sümer, Zeynep Comparing the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model |
title | Comparing the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone
and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model |
title_full | Comparing the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone
and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model |
title_fullStr | Comparing the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone
and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone
and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model |
title_short | Comparing the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone
and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model |
title_sort | comparing the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone
and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455068 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kapdanarife comparingtheantibacterialactivityofgaseousozoneandchlorhexidinesolutiononatoothcavitymodel AT oztasnurhan comparingtheantibacterialactivityofgaseousozoneandchlorhexidinesolutiononatoothcavitymodel AT sumerzeynep comparingtheantibacterialactivityofgaseousozoneandchlorhexidinesolutiononatoothcavitymodel |