Cargando…

Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) alone compared to β-TCP and Demineralized Bone Matrix (DBM) in regenerating localized horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge deficiencies prior to implant placement. Study Design: The study included 20 patients with horizont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shalash, Mahmoud A., Rahman, Hatem A., Azim, Amr A., Neemat, Amani H., Hawary, Hesham E., Nasry, Sherine A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455091
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51244
_version_ 1782299498241851392
author Shalash, Mahmoud A.
Rahman, Hatem A.
Azim, Amr A.
Neemat, Amani H.
Hawary, Hesham E.
Nasry, Sherine A.
author_facet Shalash, Mahmoud A.
Rahman, Hatem A.
Azim, Amr A.
Neemat, Amani H.
Hawary, Hesham E.
Nasry, Sherine A.
author_sort Shalash, Mahmoud A.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) alone compared to β-TCP and Demineralized Bone Matrix (DBM) in regenerating localized horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge deficiencies prior to implant placement. Study Design: The study included 20 patients with horizontal maxillary ridge deficiencies limited to one or more neighbouring teeth and initial ridge width of ≤ 5mmm. Patients were divided equally into two equal groups. Ridge augmentation was performed using Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) principals. In group I GBR was performed using β-TCP only, while in group II both β-TCP and DBM were used. Following a 6 months healing period, bone cores from both groups were retrieved and implants were inserted. Specimens were examined histologically to calculate percentage of mineralized bone. Apical and crestal changes in ridge dimensions were calculated by digital subtraction using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) immediately after graft placement and six months later. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the mean area percentage of mineralized bone between both groups where it was 40.1 % (range: 27.76-% 66.29 %) for group I and 68.96 % (range: 60.07 % - 87.33 %) for group II. Radiograpically, the mean ridge width in group I increased crestally to 4.66 mm (range:3.5-5mm) and apically to 6.12 mm (range: 4.1-6.7 mm). In group II the mean ridge width increased crestally to 5.2 mm (range 4.9-5.4mm) and apically to 6.9 mm (range 6.0-7.8 mm). Group II showed more bone gain with a mean of 1.37 mm crestally and 2.44 mm apically. This difference however was not statistically significant Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study the combination of DBM and β-TCP can be used effectively in cases exhibiting minimal alveolar ridge defects. Key words:Guided bone regeneration, equine bone, alloplast, bone graft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3892264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38922642014-01-22 Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study Shalash, Mahmoud A. Rahman, Hatem A. Azim, Amr A. Neemat, Amani H. Hawary, Hesham E. Nasry, Sherine A. J Clin Exp Dent Research Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) alone compared to β-TCP and Demineralized Bone Matrix (DBM) in regenerating localized horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge deficiencies prior to implant placement. Study Design: The study included 20 patients with horizontal maxillary ridge deficiencies limited to one or more neighbouring teeth and initial ridge width of ≤ 5mmm. Patients were divided equally into two equal groups. Ridge augmentation was performed using Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) principals. In group I GBR was performed using β-TCP only, while in group II both β-TCP and DBM were used. Following a 6 months healing period, bone cores from both groups were retrieved and implants were inserted. Specimens were examined histologically to calculate percentage of mineralized bone. Apical and crestal changes in ridge dimensions were calculated by digital subtraction using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) immediately after graft placement and six months later. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the mean area percentage of mineralized bone between both groups where it was 40.1 % (range: 27.76-% 66.29 %) for group I and 68.96 % (range: 60.07 % - 87.33 %) for group II. Radiograpically, the mean ridge width in group I increased crestally to 4.66 mm (range:3.5-5mm) and apically to 6.12 mm (range: 4.1-6.7 mm). In group II the mean ridge width increased crestally to 5.2 mm (range 4.9-5.4mm) and apically to 6.9 mm (range 6.0-7.8 mm). Group II showed more bone gain with a mean of 1.37 mm crestally and 2.44 mm apically. This difference however was not statistically significant Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study the combination of DBM and β-TCP can be used effectively in cases exhibiting minimal alveolar ridge defects. Key words:Guided bone regeneration, equine bone, alloplast, bone graft. Medicina Oral S.L. 2013-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3892264/ /pubmed/24455091 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51244 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Shalash, Mahmoud A.
Rahman, Hatem A.
Azim, Amr A.
Neemat, Amani H.
Hawary, Hesham E.
Nasry, Sherine A.
Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study
title Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study
title_full Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study
title_fullStr Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study
title_short Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study
title_sort evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: a comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455091
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51244
work_keys_str_mv AT shalashmahmouda evaluationofhorizontalridgeaugmentationusingbetatricalciumphosphateanddemineralizedbonematrixacomparativestudy
AT rahmanhatema evaluationofhorizontalridgeaugmentationusingbetatricalciumphosphateanddemineralizedbonematrixacomparativestudy
AT azimamra evaluationofhorizontalridgeaugmentationusingbetatricalciumphosphateanddemineralizedbonematrixacomparativestudy
AT neematamanih evaluationofhorizontalridgeaugmentationusingbetatricalciumphosphateanddemineralizedbonematrixacomparativestudy
AT hawaryheshame evaluationofhorizontalridgeaugmentationusingbetatricalciumphosphateanddemineralizedbonematrixacomparativestudy
AT nasrysherinea evaluationofhorizontalridgeaugmentationusingbetatricalciumphosphateanddemineralizedbonematrixacomparativestudy