Cargando…
Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model
State-of-the-art parallel MRI techniques either explicitly or implicitly require certain parameters to be estimated, e.g., the sensitivity map for SENSE, SMASH and interpolation weights for GRAPPA, SPIRiT. Thus all these techniques are sensitive to the calibration (parameter estimation) stage. In th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24316569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s131216714 |
_version_ | 1782299590342475776 |
---|---|
author | Majumdar, Angshul Chaudhury, Kunal Narayan Ward, Rabab |
author_facet | Majumdar, Angshul Chaudhury, Kunal Narayan Ward, Rabab |
author_sort | Majumdar, Angshul |
collection | PubMed |
description | State-of-the-art parallel MRI techniques either explicitly or implicitly require certain parameters to be estimated, e.g., the sensitivity map for SENSE, SMASH and interpolation weights for GRAPPA, SPIRiT. Thus all these techniques are sensitive to the calibration (parameter estimation) stage. In this work, we have proposed a parallel MRI technique that does not require any calibration but yields reconstruction results that are at par with (or even better than) state-of-the-art methods in parallel MRI. Our proposed method required solving non-convex analysis and synthesis prior joint-sparsity problems. This work also derives the algorithms for solving them. Experimental validation was carried out on two datasets—eight channel brain and eight channel Shepp-Logan phantom. Two sampling methods were used—Variable Density Random sampling and non-Cartesian Radial sampling. For the brain data, acceleration factor of 4 was used and for the other an acceleration factor of 6 was used. The reconstruction results were quantitatively evaluated based on the Normalised Mean Squared Error between the reconstructed image and the originals. The qualitative evaluation was based on the actual reconstructed images. We compared our work with four state-of-the-art parallel imaging techniques; two calibrated methods—CS SENSE and l1SPIRiT and two calibration free techniques—Distributed CS and SAKE. Our method yields better reconstruction results than all of them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3892827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38928272014-01-16 Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model Majumdar, Angshul Chaudhury, Kunal Narayan Ward, Rabab Sensors (Basel) Article State-of-the-art parallel MRI techniques either explicitly or implicitly require certain parameters to be estimated, e.g., the sensitivity map for SENSE, SMASH and interpolation weights for GRAPPA, SPIRiT. Thus all these techniques are sensitive to the calibration (parameter estimation) stage. In this work, we have proposed a parallel MRI technique that does not require any calibration but yields reconstruction results that are at par with (or even better than) state-of-the-art methods in parallel MRI. Our proposed method required solving non-convex analysis and synthesis prior joint-sparsity problems. This work also derives the algorithms for solving them. Experimental validation was carried out on two datasets—eight channel brain and eight channel Shepp-Logan phantom. Two sampling methods were used—Variable Density Random sampling and non-Cartesian Radial sampling. For the brain data, acceleration factor of 4 was used and for the other an acceleration factor of 6 was used. The reconstruction results were quantitatively evaluated based on the Normalised Mean Squared Error between the reconstructed image and the originals. The qualitative evaluation was based on the actual reconstructed images. We compared our work with four state-of-the-art parallel imaging techniques; two calibrated methods—CS SENSE and l1SPIRiT and two calibration free techniques—Distributed CS and SAKE. Our method yields better reconstruction results than all of them. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3892827/ /pubmed/24316569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s131216714 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Majumdar, Angshul Chaudhury, Kunal Narayan Ward, Rabab Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model |
title | Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model |
title_full | Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model |
title_fullStr | Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model |
title_short | Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model |
title_sort | calibrationless parallel magnetic resonance imaging: a joint sparsity model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24316569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s131216714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majumdarangshul calibrationlessparallelmagneticresonanceimagingajointsparsitymodel AT chaudhurykunalnarayan calibrationlessparallelmagneticresonanceimagingajointsparsitymodel AT wardrabab calibrationlessparallelmagneticresonanceimagingajointsparsitymodel |