Cargando…

Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model

State-of-the-art parallel MRI techniques either explicitly or implicitly require certain parameters to be estimated, e.g., the sensitivity map for SENSE, SMASH and interpolation weights for GRAPPA, SPIRiT. Thus all these techniques are sensitive to the calibration (parameter estimation) stage. In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majumdar, Angshul, Chaudhury, Kunal Narayan, Ward, Rabab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24316569
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s131216714
_version_ 1782299590342475776
author Majumdar, Angshul
Chaudhury, Kunal Narayan
Ward, Rabab
author_facet Majumdar, Angshul
Chaudhury, Kunal Narayan
Ward, Rabab
author_sort Majumdar, Angshul
collection PubMed
description State-of-the-art parallel MRI techniques either explicitly or implicitly require certain parameters to be estimated, e.g., the sensitivity map for SENSE, SMASH and interpolation weights for GRAPPA, SPIRiT. Thus all these techniques are sensitive to the calibration (parameter estimation) stage. In this work, we have proposed a parallel MRI technique that does not require any calibration but yields reconstruction results that are at par with (or even better than) state-of-the-art methods in parallel MRI. Our proposed method required solving non-convex analysis and synthesis prior joint-sparsity problems. This work also derives the algorithms for solving them. Experimental validation was carried out on two datasets—eight channel brain and eight channel Shepp-Logan phantom. Two sampling methods were used—Variable Density Random sampling and non-Cartesian Radial sampling. For the brain data, acceleration factor of 4 was used and for the other an acceleration factor of 6 was used. The reconstruction results were quantitatively evaluated based on the Normalised Mean Squared Error between the reconstructed image and the originals. The qualitative evaluation was based on the actual reconstructed images. We compared our work with four state-of-the-art parallel imaging techniques; two calibrated methods—CS SENSE and l1SPIRiT and two calibration free techniques—Distributed CS and SAKE. Our method yields better reconstruction results than all of them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3892827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38928272014-01-16 Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model Majumdar, Angshul Chaudhury, Kunal Narayan Ward, Rabab Sensors (Basel) Article State-of-the-art parallel MRI techniques either explicitly or implicitly require certain parameters to be estimated, e.g., the sensitivity map for SENSE, SMASH and interpolation weights for GRAPPA, SPIRiT. Thus all these techniques are sensitive to the calibration (parameter estimation) stage. In this work, we have proposed a parallel MRI technique that does not require any calibration but yields reconstruction results that are at par with (or even better than) state-of-the-art methods in parallel MRI. Our proposed method required solving non-convex analysis and synthesis prior joint-sparsity problems. This work also derives the algorithms for solving them. Experimental validation was carried out on two datasets—eight channel brain and eight channel Shepp-Logan phantom. Two sampling methods were used—Variable Density Random sampling and non-Cartesian Radial sampling. For the brain data, acceleration factor of 4 was used and for the other an acceleration factor of 6 was used. The reconstruction results were quantitatively evaluated based on the Normalised Mean Squared Error between the reconstructed image and the originals. The qualitative evaluation was based on the actual reconstructed images. We compared our work with four state-of-the-art parallel imaging techniques; two calibrated methods—CS SENSE and l1SPIRiT and two calibration free techniques—Distributed CS and SAKE. Our method yields better reconstruction results than all of them. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3892827/ /pubmed/24316569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s131216714 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Majumdar, Angshul
Chaudhury, Kunal Narayan
Ward, Rabab
Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model
title Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model
title_full Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model
title_fullStr Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model
title_full_unstemmed Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model
title_short Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model
title_sort calibrationless parallel magnetic resonance imaging: a joint sparsity model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24316569
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s131216714
work_keys_str_mv AT majumdarangshul calibrationlessparallelmagneticresonanceimagingajointsparsitymodel
AT chaudhurykunalnarayan calibrationlessparallelmagneticresonanceimagingajointsparsitymodel
AT wardrabab calibrationlessparallelmagneticresonanceimagingajointsparsitymodel