Cargando…

Reconsidering the Sedentary Behaviour Paradigm

AIMS: Recent literature has posed sedentary behaviour as an independent entity to physical inactivity. This study investigated whether associations between sedentary behaviour and cardio-metabolic biomarkers remain when analyses are adjusted for total physical activity. METHODS: Cross-sectional anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maher, Carol, Olds, Tim, Mire, Emily, Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24454968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086403
_version_ 1782299659644960768
author Maher, Carol
Olds, Tim
Mire, Emily
Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
author_facet Maher, Carol
Olds, Tim
Mire, Emily
Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
author_sort Maher, Carol
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Recent literature has posed sedentary behaviour as an independent entity to physical inactivity. This study investigated whether associations between sedentary behaviour and cardio-metabolic biomarkers remain when analyses are adjusted for total physical activity. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses were undertaken on 4,618 adults from the 2003/04 and 2005/06 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Minutes of sedentary behaviour and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and total physical activity (total daily accelerometer counts minus counts accrued during sedentary minutes) were determined from accelerometry. Associations between sedentary behaviour and cardio-metabolic biomarkers were examined using linear regression. RESULTS: Results showed that sedentary behaviour was detrimentally associated with 8/11 cardio-metabolic biomarkers when adjusted for MVPA. However, when adjusted for total physical activity, the associations effectively disappeared, except for C-reactive protein, which showed a very small, favourable association (β = −0.06) and triglycerides, which showed a very small, detrimental association (β = 0.04). Standardised betas suggested that total physical activity was consistently, favourably associated with cardio-metabolic biomarkers (9/11 biomarkers, standardized β = 0.08–0.30) while sedentary behaviour was detrimentally associated with just 1 biomarker (standardized β = 0.12). CONCLUSION: There is virtually no association between sedentary behaviour and cardio-metabolic biomarkers once analyses are adjusted for total physical activity. This suggests that sedentary behaviour may not have health effects independent of physical activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3893290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38932902014-01-21 Reconsidering the Sedentary Behaviour Paradigm Maher, Carol Olds, Tim Mire, Emily Katzmarzyk, Peter T. PLoS One Research Article AIMS: Recent literature has posed sedentary behaviour as an independent entity to physical inactivity. This study investigated whether associations between sedentary behaviour and cardio-metabolic biomarkers remain when analyses are adjusted for total physical activity. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses were undertaken on 4,618 adults from the 2003/04 and 2005/06 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Minutes of sedentary behaviour and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and total physical activity (total daily accelerometer counts minus counts accrued during sedentary minutes) were determined from accelerometry. Associations between sedentary behaviour and cardio-metabolic biomarkers were examined using linear regression. RESULTS: Results showed that sedentary behaviour was detrimentally associated with 8/11 cardio-metabolic biomarkers when adjusted for MVPA. However, when adjusted for total physical activity, the associations effectively disappeared, except for C-reactive protein, which showed a very small, favourable association (β = −0.06) and triglycerides, which showed a very small, detrimental association (β = 0.04). Standardised betas suggested that total physical activity was consistently, favourably associated with cardio-metabolic biomarkers (9/11 biomarkers, standardized β = 0.08–0.30) while sedentary behaviour was detrimentally associated with just 1 biomarker (standardized β = 0.12). CONCLUSION: There is virtually no association between sedentary behaviour and cardio-metabolic biomarkers once analyses are adjusted for total physical activity. This suggests that sedentary behaviour may not have health effects independent of physical activity. Public Library of Science 2014-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3893290/ /pubmed/24454968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086403 Text en © 2014 Maher et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maher, Carol
Olds, Tim
Mire, Emily
Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
Reconsidering the Sedentary Behaviour Paradigm
title Reconsidering the Sedentary Behaviour Paradigm
title_full Reconsidering the Sedentary Behaviour Paradigm
title_fullStr Reconsidering the Sedentary Behaviour Paradigm
title_full_unstemmed Reconsidering the Sedentary Behaviour Paradigm
title_short Reconsidering the Sedentary Behaviour Paradigm
title_sort reconsidering the sedentary behaviour paradigm
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24454968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086403
work_keys_str_mv AT mahercarol reconsideringthesedentarybehaviourparadigm
AT oldstim reconsideringthesedentarybehaviourparadigm
AT mireemily reconsideringthesedentarybehaviourparadigm
AT katzmarzykpetert reconsideringthesedentarybehaviourparadigm