Cargando…

Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine

BACKGROUND: Detecting impaired glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important in intensive care units (ICU) in order to diagnose acute kidney injuries and adjust the dose of renally excreted drugs. Whether serum Cystatin C (SCysC) may better reflect glomerular filtration rate than serum creatinine (S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delanaye, Pierre, Cavalier, Etienne, Morel, Jérôme, Mehdi, Manolie, Maillard, Nicolas, Claisse, Guillaume, Lambermont, Bernard, Dubois, Bernard E, Damas, Pierre, Krzesinski, Jean-Marie, Lautrette, Alexandre, Mariat, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-15-9
_version_ 1782299670607822848
author Delanaye, Pierre
Cavalier, Etienne
Morel, Jérôme
Mehdi, Manolie
Maillard, Nicolas
Claisse, Guillaume
Lambermont, Bernard
Dubois, Bernard E
Damas, Pierre
Krzesinski, Jean-Marie
Lautrette, Alexandre
Mariat, Christophe
author_facet Delanaye, Pierre
Cavalier, Etienne
Morel, Jérôme
Mehdi, Manolie
Maillard, Nicolas
Claisse, Guillaume
Lambermont, Bernard
Dubois, Bernard E
Damas, Pierre
Krzesinski, Jean-Marie
Lautrette, Alexandre
Mariat, Christophe
author_sort Delanaye, Pierre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Detecting impaired glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important in intensive care units (ICU) in order to diagnose acute kidney injuries and adjust the dose of renally excreted drugs. Whether serum Cystatin C (SCysC) may better reflect glomerular filtration rate than serum creatinine (SCr) in the context of intensive care medicine is uncertain. METHODS: We compared the performance of SCysC and SCr as biomarkers of GFR in 47 critically ill patients (median SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score of 5) for whom GFR was measured by a reference method (urinary clearance of iohexol). RESULTS: Mean Iohexol clearance averaged 96 ± 54 mL/min and was under 60 mL/min in 28% of patients. Mean SCr and SCysC concentrations were 0.70 ± 0.33 mg/dL and 1.26 ± 0.61 mg/L, respectively. Area under the ROC curve for a GFR threshold of 60 mL/min was 0.799 and 0.942 for SCr and SCysC, respectively (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ScysC significantly outperfoms SCr for the detection of an impaired GFR in critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: B7072006347
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3893362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38933622014-01-17 Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine Delanaye, Pierre Cavalier, Etienne Morel, Jérôme Mehdi, Manolie Maillard, Nicolas Claisse, Guillaume Lambermont, Bernard Dubois, Bernard E Damas, Pierre Krzesinski, Jean-Marie Lautrette, Alexandre Mariat, Christophe BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Detecting impaired glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important in intensive care units (ICU) in order to diagnose acute kidney injuries and adjust the dose of renally excreted drugs. Whether serum Cystatin C (SCysC) may better reflect glomerular filtration rate than serum creatinine (SCr) in the context of intensive care medicine is uncertain. METHODS: We compared the performance of SCysC and SCr as biomarkers of GFR in 47 critically ill patients (median SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score of 5) for whom GFR was measured by a reference method (urinary clearance of iohexol). RESULTS: Mean Iohexol clearance averaged 96 ± 54 mL/min and was under 60 mL/min in 28% of patients. Mean SCr and SCysC concentrations were 0.70 ± 0.33 mg/dL and 1.26 ± 0.61 mg/L, respectively. Area under the ROC curve for a GFR threshold of 60 mL/min was 0.799 and 0.942 for SCr and SCysC, respectively (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ScysC significantly outperfoms SCr for the detection of an impaired GFR in critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: B7072006347 BioMed Central 2014-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3893362/ /pubmed/24410757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-15-9 Text en Copyright © 2014 Delanaye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Delanaye, Pierre
Cavalier, Etienne
Morel, Jérôme
Mehdi, Manolie
Maillard, Nicolas
Claisse, Guillaume
Lambermont, Bernard
Dubois, Bernard E
Damas, Pierre
Krzesinski, Jean-Marie
Lautrette, Alexandre
Mariat, Christophe
Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine
title Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine
title_full Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine
title_fullStr Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine
title_full_unstemmed Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine
title_short Detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine
title_sort detection of decreased glomerular filtration rate in intensive care units: serum cystatin c versus serum creatinine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-15-9
work_keys_str_mv AT delanayepierre detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT cavalieretienne detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT moreljerome detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT mehdimanolie detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT maillardnicolas detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT claisseguillaume detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT lambermontbernard detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT duboisbernarde detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT damaspierre detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT krzesinskijeanmarie detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT lautrettealexandre detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine
AT mariatchristophe detectionofdecreasedglomerularfiltrationrateinintensivecareunitsserumcystatincversusserumcreatinine