Cargando…

Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations

BACKGROUND: The approval of vemurafenib in the US 2011 and in Europe 2012 improved the therapy of not resectable or metastatic melanoma. Patients carrying a substitution of valine to glutamic acid at codon 600 (p.V600E) or a substitution of valine to leucine (p.V600K) in BRAF show complete or partia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ihle, Michaela Angelika, Fassunke, Jana, König, Katharina, Grünewald, Inga, Schlaak, Max, Kreuzberg, Nicole, Tietze, Lothar, Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich, Büttner, Reinhard, Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-13
_version_ 1782299686555615232
author Ihle, Michaela Angelika
Fassunke, Jana
König, Katharina
Grünewald, Inga
Schlaak, Max
Kreuzberg, Nicole
Tietze, Lothar
Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
Büttner, Reinhard
Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
author_facet Ihle, Michaela Angelika
Fassunke, Jana
König, Katharina
Grünewald, Inga
Schlaak, Max
Kreuzberg, Nicole
Tietze, Lothar
Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
Büttner, Reinhard
Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
author_sort Ihle, Michaela Angelika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The approval of vemurafenib in the US 2011 and in Europe 2012 improved the therapy of not resectable or metastatic melanoma. Patients carrying a substitution of valine to glutamic acid at codon 600 (p.V600E) or a substitution of valine to leucine (p.V600K) in BRAF show complete or partial response. Therefore, the precise identification of the underlying somatic mutations is essential. Herein, we evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and feasibility of six different methods for the detection of BRAF mutations. METHODS: Samples harboring p.V600E mutations as well as rare mutations in BRAF exon 15 were compared to wildtype samples. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues by manual micro-dissection and automated extraction. BRAF mutational analysis was carried out by high resolution melting (HRM) analysis, pyrosequencing, allele specific PCR, next generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). All mutations were independently reassessed by Sanger sequencing. Due to the limited tumor tissue available different numbers of samples were analyzed with each method (82, 72, 60, 72, 49 and 82 respectively). RESULTS: There was no difference in sensitivity between the HRM analysis and Sanger sequencing (98%). All mutations down to 6.6% allele frequency could be detected with 100% specificity. In contrast, pyrosequencing detected 100% of the mutations down to 5% allele frequency but exhibited only 90% specificity. The allele specific PCR failed to detect 16.3% of the mutations eligible for therapy with vemurafenib. NGS could analyze 100% of the cases with 100% specificity but exhibited 97.5% sensitivity. IHC showed once cross-reactivity with p.V600R but was a good amendment to HRM. CONCLUSION: Therefore, at present, a combination of HRM and IHC is recommended to increase sensitivity and specificity for routine diagnostic to fulfill the European requirements concerning vemurafenib therapy of melanoma patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3893431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38934312014-01-17 Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations Ihle, Michaela Angelika Fassunke, Jana König, Katharina Grünewald, Inga Schlaak, Max Kreuzberg, Nicole Tietze, Lothar Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich Büttner, Reinhard Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The approval of vemurafenib in the US 2011 and in Europe 2012 improved the therapy of not resectable or metastatic melanoma. Patients carrying a substitution of valine to glutamic acid at codon 600 (p.V600E) or a substitution of valine to leucine (p.V600K) in BRAF show complete or partial response. Therefore, the precise identification of the underlying somatic mutations is essential. Herein, we evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and feasibility of six different methods for the detection of BRAF mutations. METHODS: Samples harboring p.V600E mutations as well as rare mutations in BRAF exon 15 were compared to wildtype samples. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues by manual micro-dissection and automated extraction. BRAF mutational analysis was carried out by high resolution melting (HRM) analysis, pyrosequencing, allele specific PCR, next generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). All mutations were independently reassessed by Sanger sequencing. Due to the limited tumor tissue available different numbers of samples were analyzed with each method (82, 72, 60, 72, 49 and 82 respectively). RESULTS: There was no difference in sensitivity between the HRM analysis and Sanger sequencing (98%). All mutations down to 6.6% allele frequency could be detected with 100% specificity. In contrast, pyrosequencing detected 100% of the mutations down to 5% allele frequency but exhibited only 90% specificity. The allele specific PCR failed to detect 16.3% of the mutations eligible for therapy with vemurafenib. NGS could analyze 100% of the cases with 100% specificity but exhibited 97.5% sensitivity. IHC showed once cross-reactivity with p.V600R but was a good amendment to HRM. CONCLUSION: Therefore, at present, a combination of HRM and IHC is recommended to increase sensitivity and specificity for routine diagnostic to fulfill the European requirements concerning vemurafenib therapy of melanoma patients. BioMed Central 2014-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3893431/ /pubmed/24410877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-13 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ihle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ihle, Michaela Angelika
Fassunke, Jana
König, Katharina
Grünewald, Inga
Schlaak, Max
Kreuzberg, Nicole
Tietze, Lothar
Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
Büttner, Reinhard
Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations
title Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations
title_full Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations
title_fullStr Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations
title_short Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations
title_sort comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional sanger sequencing for the detection of p.v600e and non-p.v600e braf mutations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-13
work_keys_str_mv AT ihlemichaelaangelika comparisonofhighresolutionmeltinganalysispyrosequencingnextgenerationsequencingandimmunohistochemistrytoconventionalsangersequencingforthedetectionofpv600eandnonpv600ebrafmutations
AT fassunkejana comparisonofhighresolutionmeltinganalysispyrosequencingnextgenerationsequencingandimmunohistochemistrytoconventionalsangersequencingforthedetectionofpv600eandnonpv600ebrafmutations
AT konigkatharina comparisonofhighresolutionmeltinganalysispyrosequencingnextgenerationsequencingandimmunohistochemistrytoconventionalsangersequencingforthedetectionofpv600eandnonpv600ebrafmutations
AT grunewaldinga comparisonofhighresolutionmeltinganalysispyrosequencingnextgenerationsequencingandimmunohistochemistrytoconventionalsangersequencingforthedetectionofpv600eandnonpv600ebrafmutations
AT schlaakmax comparisonofhighresolutionmeltinganalysispyrosequencingnextgenerationsequencingandimmunohistochemistrytoconventionalsangersequencingforthedetectionofpv600eandnonpv600ebrafmutations
AT kreuzbergnicole comparisonofhighresolutionmeltinganalysispyrosequencingnextgenerationsequencingandimmunohistochemistrytoconventionalsangersequencingforthedetectionofpv600eandnonpv600ebrafmutations
AT tietzelothar comparisonofhighresolutionmeltinganalysispyrosequencingnextgenerationsequencingandimmunohistochemistrytoconventionalsangersequencingforthedetectionofpv600eandnonpv600ebrafmutations
AT schildhaushansulrich comparisonofhighresolutionmeltinganalysispyrosequencingnextgenerationsequencingandimmunohistochemistrytoconventionalsangersequencingforthedetectionofpv600eandnonpv600ebrafmutations
AT buttnerreinhard comparisonofhighresolutionmeltinganalysispyrosequencingnextgenerationsequencingandimmunohistochemistrytoconventionalsangersequencingforthedetectionofpv600eandnonpv600ebrafmutations
AT merkelbachbrusesabine comparisonofhighresolutionmeltinganalysispyrosequencingnextgenerationsequencingandimmunohistochemistrytoconventionalsangersequencingforthedetectionofpv600eandnonpv600ebrafmutations