Cargando…
A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
Introduction. About half of all new ipsilateral events after a primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are invasive carcinoma. We studied tumor markers in the primary DCIS in relation to type of event (invasive versus in situ). Methods. Two hundred and sixty-six women with a primary DCIS from two so...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/582134 |
_version_ | 1782299746268872704 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Wenjing Johansson, Christine Jirström, Karin Ringberg, Anita Blomqvist, Carl Amini, Rose-Marie Fjallskog, Marie-Louise Wärnberg, Fredrik |
author_facet | Zhou, Wenjing Johansson, Christine Jirström, Karin Ringberg, Anita Blomqvist, Carl Amini, Rose-Marie Fjallskog, Marie-Louise Wärnberg, Fredrik |
author_sort | Zhou, Wenjing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. About half of all new ipsilateral events after a primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are invasive carcinoma. We studied tumor markers in the primary DCIS in relation to type of event (invasive versus in situ). Methods. Two hundred and sixty-six women with a primary DCIS from two source populations, all with a known ipsilateral event, were included. All new events were regarded as recurrences. Patient and primary tumor characteristics (estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, EGFR, and Ki67) were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to calculate odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results. One hundred and thirty-six of the recurrences were invasive carcinoma and 130 were in situ. The recurrence was more often invasive if the primary DCIS was ER+ (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.1). Primary DCIS being HER2+ (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3–0.9), EGFR+ (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.9), and ER95−/HER2+ (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.6) had a lower risk of a recurrence being invasive. Conclusions. In this study, comparing type of recurrence after a DCIS showed that the ER−/HER2+ tumors were related to a recurrence being a new DCIS. And surprisingly, tumors being ER+, HER2−, and EGFR− were related to a recurrence being invasive cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3893751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38937512014-02-02 A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ Zhou, Wenjing Johansson, Christine Jirström, Karin Ringberg, Anita Blomqvist, Carl Amini, Rose-Marie Fjallskog, Marie-Louise Wärnberg, Fredrik Int J Breast Cancer Research Article Introduction. About half of all new ipsilateral events after a primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are invasive carcinoma. We studied tumor markers in the primary DCIS in relation to type of event (invasive versus in situ). Methods. Two hundred and sixty-six women with a primary DCIS from two source populations, all with a known ipsilateral event, were included. All new events were regarded as recurrences. Patient and primary tumor characteristics (estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, EGFR, and Ki67) were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to calculate odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results. One hundred and thirty-six of the recurrences were invasive carcinoma and 130 were in situ. The recurrence was more often invasive if the primary DCIS was ER+ (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.1). Primary DCIS being HER2+ (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3–0.9), EGFR+ (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.9), and ER95−/HER2+ (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.6) had a lower risk of a recurrence being invasive. Conclusions. In this study, comparing type of recurrence after a DCIS showed that the ER−/HER2+ tumors were related to a recurrence being a new DCIS. And surprisingly, tumors being ER+, HER2−, and EGFR− were related to a recurrence being invasive cancer. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3893751/ /pubmed/24490077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/582134 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wenjing Zhou et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhou, Wenjing Johansson, Christine Jirström, Karin Ringberg, Anita Blomqvist, Carl Amini, Rose-Marie Fjallskog, Marie-Louise Wärnberg, Fredrik A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ |
title | A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
|
title_full | A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
|
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
|
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
|
title_short | A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
|
title_sort | comparison of tumor biology in primary ductal carcinoma in situ recurring as invasive carcinoma versus a new in situ |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/582134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouwenjing acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT johanssonchristine acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT jirstromkarin acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT ringberganita acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT blomqvistcarl acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT aminirosemarie acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT fjallskogmarielouise acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT warnbergfredrik acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT zhouwenjing comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT johanssonchristine comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT jirstromkarin comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT ringberganita comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT blomqvistcarl comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT aminirosemarie comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT fjallskogmarielouise comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu AT warnbergfredrik comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu |