Cargando…

A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ

Introduction. About half of all new ipsilateral events after a primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are invasive carcinoma. We studied tumor markers in the primary DCIS in relation to type of event (invasive versus in situ). Methods. Two hundred and sixty-six women with a primary DCIS from two so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Wenjing, Johansson, Christine, Jirström, Karin, Ringberg, Anita, Blomqvist, Carl, Amini, Rose-Marie, Fjallskog, Marie-Louise, Wärnberg, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/582134
_version_ 1782299746268872704
author Zhou, Wenjing
Johansson, Christine
Jirström, Karin
Ringberg, Anita
Blomqvist, Carl
Amini, Rose-Marie
Fjallskog, Marie-Louise
Wärnberg, Fredrik
author_facet Zhou, Wenjing
Johansson, Christine
Jirström, Karin
Ringberg, Anita
Blomqvist, Carl
Amini, Rose-Marie
Fjallskog, Marie-Louise
Wärnberg, Fredrik
author_sort Zhou, Wenjing
collection PubMed
description Introduction. About half of all new ipsilateral events after a primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are invasive carcinoma. We studied tumor markers in the primary DCIS in relation to type of event (invasive versus in situ). Methods. Two hundred and sixty-six women with a primary DCIS from two source populations, all with a known ipsilateral event, were included. All new events were regarded as recurrences. Patient and primary tumor characteristics (estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, EGFR, and Ki67) were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to calculate odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results. One hundred and thirty-six of the recurrences were invasive carcinoma and 130 were in situ. The recurrence was more often invasive if the primary DCIS was ER+ (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.1). Primary DCIS being HER2+ (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3–0.9), EGFR+ (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.9), and ER95−/HER2+ (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.6) had a lower risk of a recurrence being invasive. Conclusions. In this study, comparing type of recurrence after a DCIS showed that the ER−/HER2+ tumors were related to a recurrence being a new DCIS. And surprisingly, tumors being ER+, HER2−, and EGFR− were related to a recurrence being invasive cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3893751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38937512014-02-02 A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ Zhou, Wenjing Johansson, Christine Jirström, Karin Ringberg, Anita Blomqvist, Carl Amini, Rose-Marie Fjallskog, Marie-Louise Wärnberg, Fredrik Int J Breast Cancer Research Article Introduction. About half of all new ipsilateral events after a primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are invasive carcinoma. We studied tumor markers in the primary DCIS in relation to type of event (invasive versus in situ). Methods. Two hundred and sixty-six women with a primary DCIS from two source populations, all with a known ipsilateral event, were included. All new events were regarded as recurrences. Patient and primary tumor characteristics (estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, EGFR, and Ki67) were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to calculate odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results. One hundred and thirty-six of the recurrences were invasive carcinoma and 130 were in situ. The recurrence was more often invasive if the primary DCIS was ER+ (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.1). Primary DCIS being HER2+ (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3–0.9), EGFR+ (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.9), and ER95−/HER2+ (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.6) had a lower risk of a recurrence being invasive. Conclusions. In this study, comparing type of recurrence after a DCIS showed that the ER−/HER2+ tumors were related to a recurrence being a new DCIS. And surprisingly, tumors being ER+, HER2−, and EGFR− were related to a recurrence being invasive cancer. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3893751/ /pubmed/24490077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/582134 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wenjing Zhou et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Wenjing
Johansson, Christine
Jirström, Karin
Ringberg, Anita
Blomqvist, Carl
Amini, Rose-Marie
Fjallskog, Marie-Louise
Wärnberg, Fredrik
A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
title A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
title_full A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
title_fullStr A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
title_short A Comparison of Tumor Biology in Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Recurring as Invasive Carcinoma versus a New In Situ
title_sort comparison of tumor biology in primary ductal carcinoma in situ recurring as invasive carcinoma versus a new in situ
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/582134
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouwenjing acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT johanssonchristine acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT jirstromkarin acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT ringberganita acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT blomqvistcarl acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT aminirosemarie acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT fjallskogmarielouise acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT warnbergfredrik acomparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT zhouwenjing comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT johanssonchristine comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT jirstromkarin comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT ringberganita comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT blomqvistcarl comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT aminirosemarie comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT fjallskogmarielouise comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu
AT warnbergfredrik comparisonoftumorbiologyinprimaryductalcarcinomainsiturecurringasinvasivecarcinomaversusanewinsitu