Cargando…

Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful lesions leading to genomic instability or diversity. Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is a prominent DSB repair pathway, which has long been considered to be error-prone. However, recent data have pointed to the intrinsic precision of NHEJ. Three reasons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bétermier, Mireille, Bertrand, Pascale, Lopez, Bernard S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086
_version_ 1782299809349107712
author Bétermier, Mireille
Bertrand, Pascale
Lopez, Bernard S.
author_facet Bétermier, Mireille
Bertrand, Pascale
Lopez, Bernard S.
author_sort Bétermier, Mireille
collection PubMed
description DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful lesions leading to genomic instability or diversity. Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is a prominent DSB repair pathway, which has long been considered to be error-prone. However, recent data have pointed to the intrinsic precision of NHEJ. Three reasons can account for the apparent fallibility of NHEJ: 1) the existence of a highly error-prone alternative end-joining process; 2) the adaptability of canonical C-NHEJ (Ku- and Xrcc4/ligase IV–dependent) to imperfect complementary ends; and 3) the requirement to first process chemically incompatible DNA ends that cannot be ligated directly. Thus, C-NHEJ is conservative but adaptable, and the accuracy of the repair is dictated by the structure of the DNA ends rather than by the C-NHEJ machinery. We present data from different organisms that describe the conservative/versatile properties of C-NHEJ. The advantages of the adaptability/versatility of C-NHEJ are discussed for the development of the immune repertoire and the resistance to ionizing radiation, especially at low doses, and for targeted genome manipulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3894167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38941672014-01-21 Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process? Bétermier, Mireille Bertrand, Pascale Lopez, Bernard S. PLoS Genet Review DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful lesions leading to genomic instability or diversity. Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is a prominent DSB repair pathway, which has long been considered to be error-prone. However, recent data have pointed to the intrinsic precision of NHEJ. Three reasons can account for the apparent fallibility of NHEJ: 1) the existence of a highly error-prone alternative end-joining process; 2) the adaptability of canonical C-NHEJ (Ku- and Xrcc4/ligase IV–dependent) to imperfect complementary ends; and 3) the requirement to first process chemically incompatible DNA ends that cannot be ligated directly. Thus, C-NHEJ is conservative but adaptable, and the accuracy of the repair is dictated by the structure of the DNA ends rather than by the C-NHEJ machinery. We present data from different organisms that describe the conservative/versatile properties of C-NHEJ. The advantages of the adaptability/versatility of C-NHEJ are discussed for the development of the immune repertoire and the resistance to ionizing radiation, especially at low doses, and for targeted genome manipulation. Public Library of Science 2014-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3894167/ /pubmed/24453986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086 Text en © 2014 Bétermier et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Bétermier, Mireille
Bertrand, Pascale
Lopez, Bernard S.
Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?
title Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?
title_full Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?
title_fullStr Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?
title_full_unstemmed Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?
title_short Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?
title_sort is non-homologous end-joining really an inherently error-prone process?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086
work_keys_str_mv AT betermiermireille isnonhomologousendjoiningreallyaninherentlyerrorproneprocess
AT bertrandpascale isnonhomologousendjoiningreallyaninherentlyerrorproneprocess
AT lopezbernards isnonhomologousendjoiningreallyaninherentlyerrorproneprocess