Cargando…
Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful lesions leading to genomic instability or diversity. Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is a prominent DSB repair pathway, which has long been considered to be error-prone. However, recent data have pointed to the intrinsic precision of NHEJ. Three reasons...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086 |
_version_ | 1782299809349107712 |
---|---|
author | Bétermier, Mireille Bertrand, Pascale Lopez, Bernard S. |
author_facet | Bétermier, Mireille Bertrand, Pascale Lopez, Bernard S. |
author_sort | Bétermier, Mireille |
collection | PubMed |
description | DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful lesions leading to genomic instability or diversity. Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is a prominent DSB repair pathway, which has long been considered to be error-prone. However, recent data have pointed to the intrinsic precision of NHEJ. Three reasons can account for the apparent fallibility of NHEJ: 1) the existence of a highly error-prone alternative end-joining process; 2) the adaptability of canonical C-NHEJ (Ku- and Xrcc4/ligase IV–dependent) to imperfect complementary ends; and 3) the requirement to first process chemically incompatible DNA ends that cannot be ligated directly. Thus, C-NHEJ is conservative but adaptable, and the accuracy of the repair is dictated by the structure of the DNA ends rather than by the C-NHEJ machinery. We present data from different organisms that describe the conservative/versatile properties of C-NHEJ. The advantages of the adaptability/versatility of C-NHEJ are discussed for the development of the immune repertoire and the resistance to ionizing radiation, especially at low doses, and for targeted genome manipulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3894167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38941672014-01-21 Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process? Bétermier, Mireille Bertrand, Pascale Lopez, Bernard S. PLoS Genet Review DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful lesions leading to genomic instability or diversity. Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is a prominent DSB repair pathway, which has long been considered to be error-prone. However, recent data have pointed to the intrinsic precision of NHEJ. Three reasons can account for the apparent fallibility of NHEJ: 1) the existence of a highly error-prone alternative end-joining process; 2) the adaptability of canonical C-NHEJ (Ku- and Xrcc4/ligase IV–dependent) to imperfect complementary ends; and 3) the requirement to first process chemically incompatible DNA ends that cannot be ligated directly. Thus, C-NHEJ is conservative but adaptable, and the accuracy of the repair is dictated by the structure of the DNA ends rather than by the C-NHEJ machinery. We present data from different organisms that describe the conservative/versatile properties of C-NHEJ. The advantages of the adaptability/versatility of C-NHEJ are discussed for the development of the immune repertoire and the resistance to ionizing radiation, especially at low doses, and for targeted genome manipulation. Public Library of Science 2014-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3894167/ /pubmed/24453986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086 Text en © 2014 Bétermier et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Bétermier, Mireille Bertrand, Pascale Lopez, Bernard S. Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process? |
title | Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process? |
title_full | Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process? |
title_fullStr | Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process? |
title_short | Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process? |
title_sort | is non-homologous end-joining really an inherently error-prone process? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT betermiermireille isnonhomologousendjoiningreallyaninherentlyerrorproneprocess AT bertrandpascale isnonhomologousendjoiningreallyaninherentlyerrorproneprocess AT lopezbernards isnonhomologousendjoiningreallyaninherentlyerrorproneprocess |