Cargando…

Bioinformatics Analysis of Bacterial Annexins – Putative Ancestral Relatives of Eukaryotic Annexins

Annexins are Ca(2+)-binding, membrane-interacting proteins, widespread among eukaryotes, consisting usually of four structurally similar repeated domains. It is accepted that vertebrate annexins derive from a double genome duplication event. It has been postulated that a single domain annexin, if fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kodavali, Praveen Kumar, Dudkiewicz, Małgorzata, Pikuła, Sławomir, Pawłowski, Krzysztof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24454864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085428
_version_ 1782299812574527488
author Kodavali, Praveen Kumar
Dudkiewicz, Małgorzata
Pikuła, Sławomir
Pawłowski, Krzysztof
author_facet Kodavali, Praveen Kumar
Dudkiewicz, Małgorzata
Pikuła, Sławomir
Pawłowski, Krzysztof
author_sort Kodavali, Praveen Kumar
collection PubMed
description Annexins are Ca(2+)-binding, membrane-interacting proteins, widespread among eukaryotes, consisting usually of four structurally similar repeated domains. It is accepted that vertebrate annexins derive from a double genome duplication event. It has been postulated that a single domain annexin, if found, might represent a molecule related to the hypothetical ancestral annexin. The recent discovery of a single-domain annexin in a bacterium, Cytophaga hutchinsonii, apparently confirmed this hypothesis. Here, we present a more complex picture. Using remote sequence similarity detection tools, a survey of bacterial genomes was performed in search of annexin-like proteins. In total, we identified about thirty annexin homologues, including single-domain and multi-domain annexins, in seventeen bacterial species. The thorough search yielded, besides the known annexin homologue from C. hutchinsonii, homologues from the Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi phylum, from Gemmatimonadetes, from beta- and delta-Proteobacteria, and from Actinobacteria. The sequences of bacterial annexins exhibited remote but statistically significant similarity to sequence profiles built of the eukaryotic ones. Some bacterial annexins are equipped with additional, different domains, for example those characteristic for toxins. The variation in bacterial annexin sequences, much wider than that observed in eukaryotes, and different domain architectures suggest that annexins found in bacteria may actually descend from an ancestral bacterial annexin, from which eukaryotic annexins also originate. The hypothesis of an ancient origin of bacterial annexins has to be reconciled with the fact that remarkably few bacterial strains possess annexin genes compared to the thousands of known bacterial genomes and with the patchy, anomalous phylogenetic distribution of bacterial annexins. Thus, a massive annexin gene loss in several bacterial lineages or very divergent evolution would appear a likely explanation. Alternative evolutionary scenarios, involving horizontal gene transfer between bacteria and protozoan eukaryotes, in either direction, appear much less likely. Altogether, current evidence does not allow unequivocal judgement as to the origin of bacterial annexins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3894181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38941812014-01-21 Bioinformatics Analysis of Bacterial Annexins – Putative Ancestral Relatives of Eukaryotic Annexins Kodavali, Praveen Kumar Dudkiewicz, Małgorzata Pikuła, Sławomir Pawłowski, Krzysztof PLoS One Research Article Annexins are Ca(2+)-binding, membrane-interacting proteins, widespread among eukaryotes, consisting usually of four structurally similar repeated domains. It is accepted that vertebrate annexins derive from a double genome duplication event. It has been postulated that a single domain annexin, if found, might represent a molecule related to the hypothetical ancestral annexin. The recent discovery of a single-domain annexin in a bacterium, Cytophaga hutchinsonii, apparently confirmed this hypothesis. Here, we present a more complex picture. Using remote sequence similarity detection tools, a survey of bacterial genomes was performed in search of annexin-like proteins. In total, we identified about thirty annexin homologues, including single-domain and multi-domain annexins, in seventeen bacterial species. The thorough search yielded, besides the known annexin homologue from C. hutchinsonii, homologues from the Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi phylum, from Gemmatimonadetes, from beta- and delta-Proteobacteria, and from Actinobacteria. The sequences of bacterial annexins exhibited remote but statistically significant similarity to sequence profiles built of the eukaryotic ones. Some bacterial annexins are equipped with additional, different domains, for example those characteristic for toxins. The variation in bacterial annexin sequences, much wider than that observed in eukaryotes, and different domain architectures suggest that annexins found in bacteria may actually descend from an ancestral bacterial annexin, from which eukaryotic annexins also originate. The hypothesis of an ancient origin of bacterial annexins has to be reconciled with the fact that remarkably few bacterial strains possess annexin genes compared to the thousands of known bacterial genomes and with the patchy, anomalous phylogenetic distribution of bacterial annexins. Thus, a massive annexin gene loss in several bacterial lineages or very divergent evolution would appear a likely explanation. Alternative evolutionary scenarios, involving horizontal gene transfer between bacteria and protozoan eukaryotes, in either direction, appear much less likely. Altogether, current evidence does not allow unequivocal judgement as to the origin of bacterial annexins. Public Library of Science 2014-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3894181/ /pubmed/24454864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085428 Text en © 2014 Kodavali et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kodavali, Praveen Kumar
Dudkiewicz, Małgorzata
Pikuła, Sławomir
Pawłowski, Krzysztof
Bioinformatics Analysis of Bacterial Annexins – Putative Ancestral Relatives of Eukaryotic Annexins
title Bioinformatics Analysis of Bacterial Annexins – Putative Ancestral Relatives of Eukaryotic Annexins
title_full Bioinformatics Analysis of Bacterial Annexins – Putative Ancestral Relatives of Eukaryotic Annexins
title_fullStr Bioinformatics Analysis of Bacterial Annexins – Putative Ancestral Relatives of Eukaryotic Annexins
title_full_unstemmed Bioinformatics Analysis of Bacterial Annexins – Putative Ancestral Relatives of Eukaryotic Annexins
title_short Bioinformatics Analysis of Bacterial Annexins – Putative Ancestral Relatives of Eukaryotic Annexins
title_sort bioinformatics analysis of bacterial annexins – putative ancestral relatives of eukaryotic annexins
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24454864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085428
work_keys_str_mv AT kodavalipraveenkumar bioinformaticsanalysisofbacterialannexinsputativeancestralrelativesofeukaryoticannexins
AT dudkiewiczmałgorzata bioinformaticsanalysisofbacterialannexinsputativeancestralrelativesofeukaryoticannexins
AT pikułasławomir bioinformaticsanalysisofbacterialannexinsputativeancestralrelativesofeukaryoticannexins
AT pawłowskikrzysztof bioinformaticsanalysisofbacterialannexinsputativeancestralrelativesofeukaryoticannexins