Cargando…
A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
OBJECTIVE: This randomized double-blind clinical trial compared the performance of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel, after 1-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen volunteers requiring at least two posterior composite restorations were selected. Twenty-nine cavities wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000200009 |
_version_ | 1782299887695560704 |
---|---|
author | COELHO-DE-SOUZA, Fábio Herrmann CAMARGO, Junara Cristina BESKOW, Tiago BALESTRIN, Matheus Dalmolin KLEIN-JÚNIOR, Celso Afonso DEMARCO, Flávio Fernando |
author_facet | COELHO-DE-SOUZA, Fábio Herrmann CAMARGO, Junara Cristina BESKOW, Tiago BALESTRIN, Matheus Dalmolin KLEIN-JÚNIOR, Celso Afonso DEMARCO, Flávio Fernando |
author_sort | COELHO-DE-SOUZA, Fábio Herrmann |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This randomized double-blind clinical trial compared the performance of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel, after 1-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen volunteers requiring at least two posterior composite restorations were selected. Twenty-nine cavities were performed, comprising 14 without bevel (butt joint) and 15 with bevel preparation of the enamel cavosurface angle. All cavities were restored with simplified adhesive system (Adper Single Bond) and composite resin (Filtek P60). A halogen light curing unit was used through the study. Restorations were polished immediately. Analysis was carried out at baseline, after 6 months and after 1 year by a calibrated evaluator (Kappa), according to the FDI criteria. Data were statistically analyzed by Mann-Whitney test (p<0.05). RESULTS: Beveled and non-beveled cavities performed similarly after 1 year follow-up, regarding to fractures and retention, marginal adaptation, postoperative hypersensitivity, recurrence of caries, surface luster and anatomic form. However, for surface and marginal staining, beveled cavities showed significantly better performance (p<0.05) than butt joint restorations. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the restorations were acceptable after 1 year, but restorations placed in cavities with marginal beveling showed less marginal staining than those placed in non-beveled cavities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3894759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38947592014-01-22 A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up COELHO-DE-SOUZA, Fábio Herrmann CAMARGO, Junara Cristina BESKOW, Tiago BALESTRIN, Matheus Dalmolin KLEIN-JÚNIOR, Celso Afonso DEMARCO, Flávio Fernando J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: This randomized double-blind clinical trial compared the performance of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel, after 1-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen volunteers requiring at least two posterior composite restorations were selected. Twenty-nine cavities were performed, comprising 14 without bevel (butt joint) and 15 with bevel preparation of the enamel cavosurface angle. All cavities were restored with simplified adhesive system (Adper Single Bond) and composite resin (Filtek P60). A halogen light curing unit was used through the study. Restorations were polished immediately. Analysis was carried out at baseline, after 6 months and after 1 year by a calibrated evaluator (Kappa), according to the FDI criteria. Data were statistically analyzed by Mann-Whitney test (p<0.05). RESULTS: Beveled and non-beveled cavities performed similarly after 1 year follow-up, regarding to fractures and retention, marginal adaptation, postoperative hypersensitivity, recurrence of caries, surface luster and anatomic form. However, for surface and marginal staining, beveled cavities showed significantly better performance (p<0.05) than butt joint restorations. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the restorations were acceptable after 1 year, but restorations placed in cavities with marginal beveling showed less marginal staining than those placed in non-beveled cavities. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3894759/ /pubmed/22666833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000200009 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles COELHO-DE-SOUZA, Fábio Herrmann CAMARGO, Junara Cristina BESKOW, Tiago BALESTRIN, Matheus Dalmolin KLEIN-JÚNIOR, Celso Afonso DEMARCO, Flávio Fernando A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up |
title | A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite
restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up |
title_full | A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite
restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up |
title_fullStr | A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite
restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite
restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up |
title_short | A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite
restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up |
title_sort | randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite
restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000200009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coelhodesouzafabioherrmann arandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT camargojunaracristina arandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT beskowtiago arandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT balestrinmatheusdalmolin arandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT kleinjuniorcelsoafonso arandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT demarcoflaviofernando arandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT coelhodesouzafabioherrmann randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT camargojunaracristina randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT beskowtiago randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT balestrinmatheusdalmolin randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT kleinjuniorcelsoafonso randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup AT demarcoflaviofernando randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialofposteriorcompositerestorationswithorwithoutbevel1yearfollowup |