Cargando…
Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results
BACKGROUND: De Winter and Happee [1] examined whether science based on selective publishing of significant results may be effective in accurate estimation of population effects, and whether this is even more effective than a science in which all results are published (i.e., a science without publica...
Autores principales: | van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., van Aert, Robbie C. M., Nuijten, Michèle B., Wicherts, Jelte M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084896 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?
por: Hartgerink, Chris H.J., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve
por: van Aert, Robbie C. M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis
por: van Aert, Robbie C. M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science
por: Veldkamp, Coosje L. S., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)
por: Nuijten, Michèle B., et al.
Publicado: (2015)