Cargando…
Sex-Specific Differences in Pathogen Susceptibility in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera)
Sex-related differences in susceptibility to pathogens are a common phenomenon in animals. In the eusocial Hymenoptera the two female castes, workers and queens, are diploid and males are haploid. The haploid susceptibility hypothesis predicts that haploid males are more susceptible to pathogen infe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085261 |
_version_ | 1782299913972875264 |
---|---|
author | Retschnig, Gina Williams, Geoffrey R. Mehmann, Marion M. Yañez, Orlando de Miranda, Joachim R. Neumann, Peter |
author_facet | Retschnig, Gina Williams, Geoffrey R. Mehmann, Marion M. Yañez, Orlando de Miranda, Joachim R. Neumann, Peter |
author_sort | Retschnig, Gina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sex-related differences in susceptibility to pathogens are a common phenomenon in animals. In the eusocial Hymenoptera the two female castes, workers and queens, are diploid and males are haploid. The haploid susceptibility hypothesis predicts that haploid males are more susceptible to pathogen infections compared to females. Here we test this hypothesis using adult male (drone) and female (worker) honey bees (Apis mellifera), inoculated with the gut endoparasite Nosema ceranae and/or black queen cell virus (BQCV). These pathogens were chosen due to previously reported synergistic interactions between Nosema apis and BQCV. Our data do not support synergistic interactions between N. ceranae and BQCV and also suggest that BQCV has limited effect on both drone and worker health, regardless of the infection level. However, the data clearly show that, despite lower levels of N. ceranae spores in drones than in workers, Nosema-infected drones had both a higher mortality and a lower body mass than non-infected drones, across all treatment groups, while the mortality and body mass of worker bees were largely unaffected by N. ceranae infection, suggesting that drones are more susceptible to this pathogen than workers. In conclusion, the data reveal considerable sex-specific differences in pathogen susceptibility in honey bees and highlight the importance of ultimate measures for determining susceptibility, such as mortality and body quality, rather than mere infection levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3894969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38949692014-01-24 Sex-Specific Differences in Pathogen Susceptibility in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Retschnig, Gina Williams, Geoffrey R. Mehmann, Marion M. Yañez, Orlando de Miranda, Joachim R. Neumann, Peter PLoS One Research Article Sex-related differences in susceptibility to pathogens are a common phenomenon in animals. In the eusocial Hymenoptera the two female castes, workers and queens, are diploid and males are haploid. The haploid susceptibility hypothesis predicts that haploid males are more susceptible to pathogen infections compared to females. Here we test this hypothesis using adult male (drone) and female (worker) honey bees (Apis mellifera), inoculated with the gut endoparasite Nosema ceranae and/or black queen cell virus (BQCV). These pathogens were chosen due to previously reported synergistic interactions between Nosema apis and BQCV. Our data do not support synergistic interactions between N. ceranae and BQCV and also suggest that BQCV has limited effect on both drone and worker health, regardless of the infection level. However, the data clearly show that, despite lower levels of N. ceranae spores in drones than in workers, Nosema-infected drones had both a higher mortality and a lower body mass than non-infected drones, across all treatment groups, while the mortality and body mass of worker bees were largely unaffected by N. ceranae infection, suggesting that drones are more susceptible to this pathogen than workers. In conclusion, the data reveal considerable sex-specific differences in pathogen susceptibility in honey bees and highlight the importance of ultimate measures for determining susceptibility, such as mortality and body quality, rather than mere infection levels. Public Library of Science 2014-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3894969/ /pubmed/24465518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085261 Text en © 2014 Retschnig, et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Retschnig, Gina Williams, Geoffrey R. Mehmann, Marion M. Yañez, Orlando de Miranda, Joachim R. Neumann, Peter Sex-Specific Differences in Pathogen Susceptibility in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) |
title | Sex-Specific Differences in Pathogen Susceptibility in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) |
title_full | Sex-Specific Differences in Pathogen Susceptibility in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) |
title_fullStr | Sex-Specific Differences in Pathogen Susceptibility in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex-Specific Differences in Pathogen Susceptibility in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) |
title_short | Sex-Specific Differences in Pathogen Susceptibility in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) |
title_sort | sex-specific differences in pathogen susceptibility in honey bees (apis mellifera) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT retschniggina sexspecificdifferencesinpathogensusceptibilityinhoneybeesapismellifera AT williamsgeoffreyr sexspecificdifferencesinpathogensusceptibilityinhoneybeesapismellifera AT mehmannmarionm sexspecificdifferencesinpathogensusceptibilityinhoneybeesapismellifera AT yanezorlando sexspecificdifferencesinpathogensusceptibilityinhoneybeesapismellifera AT demirandajoachimr sexspecificdifferencesinpathogensusceptibilityinhoneybeesapismellifera AT neumannpeter sexspecificdifferencesinpathogensusceptibilityinhoneybeesapismellifera |