Cargando…

Early Quick Acuity Score Provides More Complete Data on Emergency Department Walkouts

INTRODUCTION: Many prior studies have compared the acuity of Emergency Department (ED) patients who have Left Without Being Seen (LWBS) against non-LWBS patients. A weakness in these studies is that patients may walk out prior to the assignment of a triage score, biasing comparisons. We report an op...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lovett, Paris B., Kahn, J. Akiva, Greene, Stuart E., Bloch, Matthew A., Brandt, Daniel R., Minckler, Michael R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085776
_version_ 1782299919774646272
author Lovett, Paris B.
Kahn, J. Akiva
Greene, Stuart E.
Bloch, Matthew A.
Brandt, Daniel R.
Minckler, Michael R.
author_facet Lovett, Paris B.
Kahn, J. Akiva
Greene, Stuart E.
Bloch, Matthew A.
Brandt, Daniel R.
Minckler, Michael R.
author_sort Lovett, Paris B.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many prior studies have compared the acuity of Emergency Department (ED) patients who have Left Without Being Seen (LWBS) against non-LWBS patients. A weakness in these studies is that patients may walk out prior to the assignment of a triage score, biasing comparisons. We report an operational change whereby acuity was assessed immediately upon patient arrival. We hypothesized more patients would receive acuity scores with EQAS. We also sought to compare LWBS and non-LWBS patient characteristics with reduced bias. METHODS: Setting: urban, academic medical center. Retrospective cohort study, electronic chart review, collecting data on all ED patients presenting between 4/1/2010 and 10/31/2011 (“Traditional Acuity Score” period, TAS) and from 11/1/2011 to 3/31/2012 (“Early Quick Acuity Score” period, EQAS). We recorded disposition (LWBS versus non-LWBS), acuity and demographics. For each subject during the EQAS period, we calculated how many prior ED visits and how many prior walkouts the subject had had during the TAS period. RESULTS: Acuity was recorded in 92,275 of 94,526 patients (97.6%) for TAS period, and 25,577 of 25,760 patients (99.3%) for EQAS period, a difference of 1.7% (1.5%, 1.8%). LWBS patients had acuity scores recorded in 5,180 of 7,040 cases (73.6%) during TAS period, compared with 897 of 1,010 cases (88.8%) during the EQAS period, a difference of 15.2% (14.8%, 15.7%). LWBS were more likely than non-LWBS to be male, were younger and had lower acuity scores. LWBS averaged 5.3 prior ED visits compared with 2.8 by non-LWBS, a difference of 2.5 (1.5, 3.5). LWBS averaged 1.3 prior ED walkouts compared with 0.2 among non-LWBS, a difference of 1.1 (0.8, 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: EQAS resulted in a higher proportion of patients receiving acuity scores, particularly among LWBS. This offers more complete data when comparing LWBS and non-LWBS patient characteristics. The comparison reinforced findings from prior studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3894997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38949972014-01-24 Early Quick Acuity Score Provides More Complete Data on Emergency Department Walkouts Lovett, Paris B. Kahn, J. Akiva Greene, Stuart E. Bloch, Matthew A. Brandt, Daniel R. Minckler, Michael R. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Many prior studies have compared the acuity of Emergency Department (ED) patients who have Left Without Being Seen (LWBS) against non-LWBS patients. A weakness in these studies is that patients may walk out prior to the assignment of a triage score, biasing comparisons. We report an operational change whereby acuity was assessed immediately upon patient arrival. We hypothesized more patients would receive acuity scores with EQAS. We also sought to compare LWBS and non-LWBS patient characteristics with reduced bias. METHODS: Setting: urban, academic medical center. Retrospective cohort study, electronic chart review, collecting data on all ED patients presenting between 4/1/2010 and 10/31/2011 (“Traditional Acuity Score” period, TAS) and from 11/1/2011 to 3/31/2012 (“Early Quick Acuity Score” period, EQAS). We recorded disposition (LWBS versus non-LWBS), acuity and demographics. For each subject during the EQAS period, we calculated how many prior ED visits and how many prior walkouts the subject had had during the TAS period. RESULTS: Acuity was recorded in 92,275 of 94,526 patients (97.6%) for TAS period, and 25,577 of 25,760 patients (99.3%) for EQAS period, a difference of 1.7% (1.5%, 1.8%). LWBS patients had acuity scores recorded in 5,180 of 7,040 cases (73.6%) during TAS period, compared with 897 of 1,010 cases (88.8%) during the EQAS period, a difference of 15.2% (14.8%, 15.7%). LWBS were more likely than non-LWBS to be male, were younger and had lower acuity scores. LWBS averaged 5.3 prior ED visits compared with 2.8 by non-LWBS, a difference of 2.5 (1.5, 3.5). LWBS averaged 1.3 prior ED walkouts compared with 0.2 among non-LWBS, a difference of 1.1 (0.8, 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: EQAS resulted in a higher proportion of patients receiving acuity scores, particularly among LWBS. This offers more complete data when comparing LWBS and non-LWBS patient characteristics. The comparison reinforced findings from prior studies. Public Library of Science 2014-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3894997/ /pubmed/24465699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085776 Text en © 2014 Lovett et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lovett, Paris B.
Kahn, J. Akiva
Greene, Stuart E.
Bloch, Matthew A.
Brandt, Daniel R.
Minckler, Michael R.
Early Quick Acuity Score Provides More Complete Data on Emergency Department Walkouts
title Early Quick Acuity Score Provides More Complete Data on Emergency Department Walkouts
title_full Early Quick Acuity Score Provides More Complete Data on Emergency Department Walkouts
title_fullStr Early Quick Acuity Score Provides More Complete Data on Emergency Department Walkouts
title_full_unstemmed Early Quick Acuity Score Provides More Complete Data on Emergency Department Walkouts
title_short Early Quick Acuity Score Provides More Complete Data on Emergency Department Walkouts
title_sort early quick acuity score provides more complete data on emergency department walkouts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085776
work_keys_str_mv AT lovettparisb earlyquickacuityscoreprovidesmorecompletedataonemergencydepartmentwalkouts
AT kahnjakiva earlyquickacuityscoreprovidesmorecompletedataonemergencydepartmentwalkouts
AT greenestuarte earlyquickacuityscoreprovidesmorecompletedataonemergencydepartmentwalkouts
AT blochmatthewa earlyquickacuityscoreprovidesmorecompletedataonemergencydepartmentwalkouts
AT brandtdanielr earlyquickacuityscoreprovidesmorecompletedataonemergencydepartmentwalkouts
AT mincklermichaelr earlyquickacuityscoreprovidesmorecompletedataonemergencydepartmentwalkouts