Cargando…

The 2nd edition of consensus statements for the diagnosis and management of intestinal Behçet’s disease: indication of anti-TNFα monoclonal antibodies

BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence regarding intestinal Behçet’s disease (BD) management is lacking and intestinal lesions are a poor prognostic factor. In 2007, the Japan consensus statement for diagnosis and management of intestinal BD was developed. Recently, the efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hisamatsu, Tadakazu, Ueno, Fumiaki, Matsumoto, Takayuki, Kobayashi, Kiyonori, Koganei, Kazutaka, Kunisaki, Reiko, Hirai, Fumihito, Nagahori, Masakazu, Matsushita, Mitsunobu, Kobayashi, Kenji, Kishimoto, Mitsumasa, Takeno, Mitsuhiro, Tanaka, Masanori, Inoue, Nagamu, Hibi, Toshifumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23955155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-013-0872-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence regarding intestinal Behçet’s disease (BD) management is lacking and intestinal lesions are a poor prognostic factor. In 2007, the Japan consensus statement for diagnosis and management of intestinal BD was developed. Recently, the efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and infliximab (IFX) was reported and adalimumab (ADA) was approved for intestinal BD in Japan. This study renewed consensus-based practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of intestinal BD focusing on the indication of anti-TNFα mAbs. METHODS: An expert panel of Japanese gastroenterology and rheumatology specialists was involved. Clinical statements for ratings were extracted from the literature, a professional group survey, and by an expert panel discussion, which rated clinical statements on a nine-point scale. After the first round of ratings, a panelist meeting discussed areas of disagreement and clarified areas of uncertainty. The list of clinical statements was revised after the panelist meeting and a second round of ratings was conducted. RESULTS: Fifteen relevant articles were selected. Based on the first edition consensus statement, improved clinical statements regarding indications for anti-TNFα mAbs use were developed. After a two-round modified Delphi approach, the second edition of consensus statements was finalized. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to standard therapies in the first edition, anti-TNFα mAbs (ADA and IFX) should be considered as a standard therapy for intestinal BD. Colchicines, thalidomide, other pharmacological therapy, endoscopic therapy, and leukocytapheresis were deemed experimental therapies.