Cargando…

Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics

BACKGROUND: Bone density at the interradicular area plays an important role during orthodontic treatment. In view of this fact, the study was designed to quantitatively evaluate the bone density at the interradicular areas of the alveolar and basal bones of maxilla and mandible by computed tomograph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chugh, Tina, Ganeshkar, Sanjay V, Revankar, Ameet V, Jain, Abhay K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-38
_version_ 1782300006999392256
author Chugh, Tina
Ganeshkar, Sanjay V
Revankar, Ameet V
Jain, Abhay K
author_facet Chugh, Tina
Ganeshkar, Sanjay V
Revankar, Ameet V
Jain, Abhay K
author_sort Chugh, Tina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bone density at the interradicular area plays an important role during orthodontic treatment. In view of this fact, the study was designed to quantitatively evaluate the bone density at the interradicular areas of the alveolar and basal bones of maxilla and mandible by computed tomography. METHODS: One hundred and nine computed tomographic images were randomly selected, and bone density was measured in Hounsfield units (HU) with bone mineral density software (Siemens VA20A_SP3A). The sample consisted of 78 males (mean age 29.5 years, range 20 to 40 years) and 31 females (mean age 27.6 years, range 20 to 40 years). Cortical and cancellous bone density was measured at the interradicular areas at the alveolar and basal bone levels of the maxilla and mandible, and the data was subjected to statistical analysis for comparisons. RESULTS: The highest cortical bone density was observed between the second premolar and first molar at the alveolar bone level and between the first and second molars at the basal bone level in the maxilla. Maxillary tuberosity showed the least bone density. The density of the cortical bone was greater in the mandible than in the maxilla and showed a progressive increase from the incisor to the retromolar area. The basal bone showed a higher density thanthe alveolar bone. CONCLUSION: Different qualities of the bone were found in the anatomic regions studied, which confirms the importance of knowledge of site-specific bone tissue density to correlate with various clinical findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3895752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38957522015-04-07 Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics Chugh, Tina Ganeshkar, Sanjay V Revankar, Ameet V Jain, Abhay K Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: Bone density at the interradicular area plays an important role during orthodontic treatment. In view of this fact, the study was designed to quantitatively evaluate the bone density at the interradicular areas of the alveolar and basal bones of maxilla and mandible by computed tomography. METHODS: One hundred and nine computed tomographic images were randomly selected, and bone density was measured in Hounsfield units (HU) with bone mineral density software (Siemens VA20A_SP3A). The sample consisted of 78 males (mean age 29.5 years, range 20 to 40 years) and 31 females (mean age 27.6 years, range 20 to 40 years). Cortical and cancellous bone density was measured at the interradicular areas at the alveolar and basal bone levels of the maxilla and mandible, and the data was subjected to statistical analysis for comparisons. RESULTS: The highest cortical bone density was observed between the second premolar and first molar at the alveolar bone level and between the first and second molars at the basal bone level in the maxilla. Maxillary tuberosity showed the least bone density. The density of the cortical bone was greater in the mandible than in the maxilla and showed a progressive increase from the incisor to the retromolar area. The basal bone showed a higher density thanthe alveolar bone. CONCLUSION: Different qualities of the bone were found in the anatomic regions studied, which confirms the importance of knowledge of site-specific bone tissue density to correlate with various clinical findings. Springer 2013-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3895752/ /pubmed/24325883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-38 Text en Copyright © 2013 Chugh et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chugh, Tina
Ganeshkar, Sanjay V
Revankar, Ameet V
Jain, Abhay K
Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics
title Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics
title_full Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics
title_fullStr Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics
title_short Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics
title_sort quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-38
work_keys_str_mv AT chughtina quantitativeassessmentofinterradicularbonedensityinthemaxillaandmandibleimplicationsinclinicalorthodontics
AT ganeshkarsanjayv quantitativeassessmentofinterradicularbonedensityinthemaxillaandmandibleimplicationsinclinicalorthodontics
AT revankarameetv quantitativeassessmentofinterradicularbonedensityinthemaxillaandmandibleimplicationsinclinicalorthodontics
AT jainabhayk quantitativeassessmentofinterradicularbonedensityinthemaxillaandmandibleimplicationsinclinicalorthodontics